Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 17 Mar 2021 · CNR MHCC010106292019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Judgment Exh.9 1 Sum.Suit 1054/2019 MHCC010106292019 Presented on : 17-10-2019 Registered on : 01-11-2019 Decided on : 17-03-2021 Duration : 01 year 05 months IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO1054 OF 2019 (UNDER ORDER XXXVII THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908) Yallapa Pochchapa Jadhav Age : 30 years, Indian inhabitant carrying on business at Room No. 78, Makadwala Chawl, Jay Shankar Chowk, Masarani Lane, Halav Pul, Kurla West, Mumbai - 400 070. … Plaintiff VERSUS Sandeep Waman Gangawane, adult, working for gain with Western Railway Head Quaarters, Dept. Audit; Emp. No. 50800008576, TKT No.7060258, I Card No. 194, 5th Floor, Churchgate, Mumbai 400 020 and residing at A/103, Lekha Vihar Staff Quarter, Type 1, Charkop Sector-5, NR Dena Bank, Kandiwali West Mumbai 400 067. ….Defendant Appearances:- Advocates Mr. Rajesh M. Patil for the Plaintiff. Defendant Ex-parte. -- 1 of 5 -- Judgment Exh.9 2 Sum.Suit 1054/2019 CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE DEEPAK L. BHAGWAT (C.R.NO.28) DATE : 17th MARCH 2021 J U D G M E N T 1. This is Summary Suit for recovery of amount of Rs.2,95,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Ninety-five Thousand Only) with interest at the rate of 18% p.a.. 2. According to the plaintiff, in consideration of Rs.2,50,000/- obtained by the defendant from the plaintiff, the defendant executed promissory note of same amount on 09/11/2016 in favour of the plaintiff. By same promissory note the defendant promised to pay interest at the rate of 18% p.a. on the said sum of Rs.2,50,000/-. However, the defendant neglected to pay the said amount. Despite issuance of legal notice of demand dated 28/09/2018, the defendant failed to pay the said amount. At the institution of the suit, the amount due and payable by the defendant was Rs.2,95,000/-. Therefore, the plaintiff claimed decree for recovery of said amount with the interest. 3. Despite service of summons the defendant failed to appear. Therefore, the suit proceeded ex-parte against the Defendant. 4. Considering the material on record and submissions made on behalf of the plaintiff points arise for determination along with my findings thereon for the reasons recorded are as under:- -- 2 of 5 -- Judgment Exh.9 3 Sum.Suit 1054/2019 POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the amount ? Affirmative. 2. At what rate of pendente lite and future interest ? 12% p.a. 3. What order & decree? As per final order REASONS AS TO POINTS NO.1 to 3 :- 5. The plaintiff filed his Claim Affidavit at Exh.7 and also produced documents with list Exh.7. The Affidavit and the document as promissory note dtd.09/11/2016 reveal that the defendant executed said promissory note for Rs.2,50,000/- in favour of the plaintiff and also promised to pay interest at the rate of 18% p.a.. Copy of license in Form No.3 shows that the plaintiff is licensed Money Lender. Despite legal notice dtd. 28/09/2019, the defendant failed to pay the amount to the plaintiff. Thus, the Claim Affidavit, documents on record and the circumstance that defendant failed to appear and contest/challenge the suit, proved the case of the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the amount. Considering overall facts and circumstances, it is just and proper to grant interest at the rate of 12% p.a.. Hence, point No.1 is answered in the Affirmative and whereas point No.2 is answered as 12% p.a.. In view of Para-499 of Civil Manual court fees has to be refunded to the plaintiff, this being summary suit where the defendant did not appear. In answer to point No.3 order as follows is passed:- -- 3 of 5 -- Judgment Exh.9 4 Sum.Suit 1054/2019 ORDER 1. The suit is ex-parte decreed with costs as under. 2. The Defendant shall pay to the plaintiff amount of Rs.2,95,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Ninety-five Thousand Only) with simple interest at the rate of 12% p.a. on principal amount of Rs.2,50,000/- from the date of suit till realization of the amount. 3. Court fees be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (Deepak L. Bhagwat) Ad-hoc Judge, Date: 17/03/2021 City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai Dictated on : 17.03.2021 Transcribed on : 18.03.2021 Date of sign : 19.03.2021 -- 4 of 5 -- Judgment Exh.9 5 Sum.Suit 1054/2019 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE & TIME : 19.03.2021 5.20 p.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : S.S.BATHE Name of Judge (with Court Room No.) Shri.D.L.Bhagwat (C.R.NO.28) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT /ORDER 17.03.2021 JUDGMENT /ORDER signed by P.O. on 19.03.2021 JUDGMENT /ORDER uploaded on 19.03.2021 -- 5 of 5 --
