Full Order Text
Order 1 · 22 Jul 2022 · CNR MHCC010104542019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Order in Notice of Motion No. 3837 of 2019 MHCC010104542019 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3837 OF 2019. IN SHORT CAUSE SUIT NO.506 OF 2014 ITC Limited ...Applicants (Defendant) In the matter between Nirvaran Herbal Pvt. Ltd. …Plaintiff. V/s. ITC Limited ...Defendants. Appearance: None for plaintiff. Adv. Hilla Boatwala a/w Ashwini Sonawane for Defendant CORAM : H. H. JUDGE AND ASST SESSIONS JUDGE, SHRI. S. B.PAWAR (C.R.No.59) DATE : 22nd JULY, 2022. 1 -- 1 of 5 -- Order in Notice of Motion No. 3837 of 2019 ORDER Defendant has taken out this Notice of Motion with a prayer to condone delay of 252 days in filing written statement and to take on record the written statement filed by the defendant. 2. Heard Ld. advocate for defendant. Perused Notice of Motion, supporting affidavit and record of the suit. Despite of giving sufficient opportunities, plaintiff failed to file reply to Notice of Motion. Advocate for the plaintiff also failed to argue on the Notice of Motion. 3. Ld. Advocate for the defendant submits that erstwhile defendants are merged into the present defendant in 2014. The documents and record prior to 2004 were not traceable. Defendant had challenged maintainability of the suit on the ground of limitation as the suit was filed after delay of over six years. Defendant had filed chamber summons challenging the maintainability of the suit and it is dismissed on 26.11.2018. Defendant has challenged the said order before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and the writ petition is still pending. 4. It is further submitted that notice has been issued by the officer of Registrar of Companies, Chennai for striking of and dissolution of the plaintiff company. Thereafter, plaintiff company is dissolved and no one is appearing on behalf of the plaintiff in the suit for last 4 to 5 years. The said fact is intentionally not brought to the notice of the Court by the plaintiff. The delay in filing the written statement is not deliberate. The defendant will suffer harm and 2 -- 2 of 5 -- Order in Notice of Motion No. 3837 of 2019 irreparable loss if written statement is not taken on record. On the other hand, no harm and prejudice will be caused to the plaintiff if Notice of Motion is allowed. Thus, it is prayed that the Notice of Motion be allowed. 5. Record of the suit shows that the suit is lodged in this Court on 09.01.2014. Advocate for defendant appeared on 05.05.2014. Thereafter on 02.07.2014 defendant tendered draft chamber summons and till 2018 the matter was pending for hearing on chamber summons. Ultimately on 26.08.2018 the chamber summons is dismissed. Thereafter the matter was fixed for exparte evidence. 6. Record further shows that by filing Chamber Summons No. 1566 of 2014, defendant had requested for extension of time for filing of written statement till hearing and disposal of notice of motion taken out by the defendant under Order 7 rule 11 of CPC. However, the said chamber summons is disposed of as withdrawn on 23.11.2016. 7. It seems that since the day of appearance, defendant raised the objection that suit is time barred and accordingly prosecuted proceedings in the Court. It is also submitted that Writ Petition is pending before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court against the order passed by this Court in Chamber Summons No. 1567 of 2014. 8. The record further shows that since 26.08.2019 none appeared for the plaintiff in the matter. The plaintiff has not raised any objection to the prayer made in the Notice of Motion or has not 3 -- 3 of 5 -- Order in Notice of Motion No. 3837 of 2019 controverted the facts in the supporting affidavit filed by the defendant by filing affidavit in reply. The delay on the part of defendant does not appear to be deliberate or intentional. Opportunity deserves to be given to the defendant to defend the suit on merit. However, considering the period of delay, some costs need to be imposed on the defendant. The Notice of Motion can be allowed subject to costs. Therefore, following order is passed: ORDER 1. Notice of Motion 3837 of 2019 is allowed subject to cost of Rs. 1000/ (Rs. One Thousand Only) to be deposited with DLSA. 2. Defendant's written statement is taken on record. 3. Defendant shall comply the order of costs within two weeks from the date of this order. 4. Notice of Motion No. 3837 of 2019 is disposed of accordingly. (S.B. Pawar) Judge, Dated: 22/07/2022 City Civil and Sessions Court, Greater Bombay (CR 59) Declared on : 22.07.2022 Direct Typed on : 22.07.2022 Checked & Signed on : 4 -- 4 of 5 -- Order in Notice of Motion No. 3837 of 2019 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 27.07.2022 at 3.15 p.m. Mrs. P.R.Wagh UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) HHJ SHRI.S.B.Pawar,(C.R.No.59) Judge.,City Civil & Sessions Court, Date of pronouncement of /Order 27.07.2022 Order signed by P.O. on 27.07.2022 order uploaded on 27.07.2022 5 -- 5 of 5 --
