Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

M/s. P. M. ConstructionsVsMrs. Anna Marques And Anr

CNR MHCC0101025420192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 09th October 2019

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103782/2019
Registration Date
09 Oct 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 09-10-2019
Business: Adv. Clifford Martis for Plaintiff present.
Defendant no 2 present.
Adv. Arun Singh appear for defendant no 1 and 2.
Ex 3 He filed vakalatnama t.o.r.
He also filed draft notice of motion t.o.r.
O  Leave granted to register the same.
Copy is served upon plaintiffs.
Reply filed by advocate for plaintiffs to draft notice of motion.
Head both sides.
ORDER PASSED BELOW DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION
        Perused draft notice of motion, affidavit in support of it and reply of plaintiffs. Heard respective counsel for parties.
         Draft notice of motion is taken out by defendants to condone delay caused in filing written statement and to take the same on record.  It is contended that delay was caused as defendants had taken time for retrieving old documents and collecting details of old proceeding filed by the land owners against the plaintiffs.  It is further contended that delay caused is not deliberate and intentional.  Accordingly, they made prayer in above terms.
   Plaintiffs opposed notice of motion on the count that reason assigned is not plausible and prayed to dismiss notice of motion.
     It is a settled law that Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC is not mandatory and in specific circumstances written statement can be accepted with reasons. It is also held that in an adversarial system, no party should be denied an opportunity in participation of the justice dispensation system (Salem Bar Association V/s Union of India 2003 AIR SCC 189 and Zolba V/s Keshav 2008 AIR SCC 2099). In view of this legal position, now, I consider notice of motion.
      Defendants have given details about the previous proceedings which they have collected and also specifically stated that they required time to collect documents and information about the previous proceedings so they could not file written statement within prescribed time. Reason assigned by them is sufficient to condone delay caused in filing written statement.  Delay caused is not inordinate and it cannot be termed as deliberate.   More so, defendants have shown their bona fide by annexing written statement along with notice of motion. In above facts and circumstances I am inclined to allow draft notice of motion with certain costs.
Hence, passing following order
ORDER
1.      Draft notice of motion is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to costs of Rs.1000/- (Rupees one thousand only) to plaintiff within period of one week from the date of this order.
       Defendants are at  liberty to deposit costs payable to plaintiffs in the Court.
2.     On payment of costs written statement of defendants be taken on record and marked exhibit.
3.   Draft notice of motion be registered for statistical purpose.
4.   Accordingly, draft notice of motion is disposed off.
Costs paid by defendants to proprietor of plaintiffs.
Exh.4 Written statement of defendant.
Copy is given to other side.
Exh. 5 Counter Claim filed by the defendants t.o.r
Copy is given to other side.
Other side as to filed W/S within prescribed time.
Adjd for Direction to 16.12.2019
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 09-10-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 110987/2019
Filing Date: 09-10-2019
First Hearing Date: 09th October 2019
Decision Date: 09th October 2019
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
09 Oct 2019

Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 9.10.2019 SU 1992/09 Ex 3 CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02) Adv. Clifford Martis for Plaintiff present. Defendant no 2 present. Adv. Arun Singh appear for defendant no 1 and 2. Ex 3 He filed vakalatnama t.o.r. He also filed draft notice of motion t.o.r. O – Leave granted to register the same. Copy is served upon plaintiffs. Reply filed by advocate for plaintiffs to draft notice of motion. Head both sides. ORDER…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.