Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Janardhan Atmaram RawoolVsVijay Atmaram Rawool And Ors

CNR MHCC01010105201911-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 17th October 2019

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103709/2019
Registration Date
04 Oct 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Janardhan Atmaram Rawool

    Respondent

    1. 1Vijay Atmaram Rawool And Ors

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 17-10-2019
Business: Advocate Rajendra Yadav for plaintiff present and filed original Notice of Motion No.3709/19 along with affidavit in support of Notice of Motion. T.O.R.
Advocate Yerunkar for defendant no. 1 present and filed reply on NM. TOR.
Advocate Ms.Mhatre  for defendant/MCGM present.
Heard advocate for plaintiff and defendant no.1 on NM no. 3709/19.  Considering circumstances, if the plaintiff is allowed to reopen his arguments to the extent of order passed by this Court in connected suit and to rejoin the written notes of arguments submitted by defendant no.1, no prejudice will be caused to defendant no.1. Hence the order -
ORDER
1. NM no. 3709/19 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b).
2. No order as to costs.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 17-10-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 110735/2019
Filing Date: 04-10-2019
First Hearing Date: 17th October 2019
Decision Date: 17th October 2019
Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    17 Oct 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Advocate Rajendra Yadav for plaintiff present and filed original Notice of Motion No.3709/19
along with affidavit in support of Notice of Motion. T.O.R. Advocate Yerunkar for defendant no. 1
present and filed reply on NM. TOR. Advocate Ms.Mhatre for defendant/MCGM present. Heard
advocate for plaintiff and defendant no.1 on NM no. 3709/19. Considering circumstances, if the
plaintiff is allowed to reopen his arguments to the extent of order passed by this Court in connected
suit and to rejoin the written notes of arguments submitted by defendant no.1, no prejudice will be
caused to defendant no.1. Hence the order - ORDER 1. NM no. 3709/19 is made absolute in terms
of prayer clause (b). 2. No order as to costs.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.