Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 05 Jul 2025 · CNR MHCC010100902019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010100902019 Presented on 01/10/2019 Registered on 13/11/2019 Decided on 05/07/2025 Duration 05Y: 09M: 04D Exhibit 11 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MAZGAON SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1092 OF 2019 M/s. Shree Maruti Courier Services Pvt.Ltd. A company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, Represented through its Regional Manager Mr. Ranabhai S. Kodiyatar, having its Regional Office Address at Shop No.10 and 11, Parshmani Commercial Complex, MMGS Marg, Naigaon Cross Road, Dadar East, Mumbai- 400014. Mob. No. 9594299099. ...Plaintiff VERSUS 1. M/s. RA Fashions Pvt. Ltd. A Private Limited Company registered under the Company Act 1956, having office at B-1, 405, Boomerang, Village Sakinaka, Chandivali, Andheri (East), Mumbai-400072. 2. Mr. Ravindra Bisheshwar Agarwal Adult Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai Aged about: not known, Occ-Business. -- 1 of 7 -- Sum Suit 1092 of 2019 .. J/2 .. Judgment 3. Ms. Asha Ravindra Agarwal Adult Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai Aged about: not known, Occ-Business Both the Directors of M/s. RA Fashions Pvt. Ltd. having address at Flat No.902, R.N.A. Mirage, S. K. Ahire Marg, Worli, Mumbai-400030. ...Defendants Appearance : Adv. Shivani Prasad : for Plaintiff Ex parte : for Defendants HIS HONOUR JUDGE N. B. LAVTE (C.R.No.83) 05th July, 2025 J U D G M E N T (Ex-parte) This is a suit under order Order XXXVII, Rule 1 of C.P.C. for recovery of an amount of Rs. 50,530/- along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. 2] The brief facts of the plaintiff’s case is that: The plaintiff is a Company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of providing Courier & Logistic Services. In the month of March 2017, defendant Nos. 2 and 3 on behalf of defendant No.1 company approached plaintiff to avail the courier services for delivery of their business courier and parcels. -- 2 of 7 -- Sum Suit 1092 of 2019 .. J/3 .. Judgment The Courier Services were provided to defendants and invoices were raised on time and part payments were paid without any protest till August, 2017. However, bills of five invoices of Rs. 50,530/- is outstanding. 3] It is their further case that defendants to discharge their liability issued cheques bearing No.181722 dated 06/02/2018 of Rs.13,160/-, cheque No. 181721 dated 14/02/2018 of Rs.18,219/-, Cheque No.181720 dated 05/03/2018 of amount of Rs.27,559/- and cheque No.182113 dated 19/07/2018 of Rs. 9,702/-. However, when presented said cheques same were dishonored with the endorsement, “Funds insufficient”. Therefore, plaintiff issued legal notice dated 16/07/2019. Inspite of it defendants failed to pay the outstanding amount. Hence, present suit. 4] The writ of summons were duly served on the defendants. The affidavit of service is filed at Exhibit-02. As defendants failed to appear on 23/03/2022, order was passed wherein suit was directed to proceed ex-parte. 5] From the pleadings of plaintiff, following points arise for my consideration and determination, to which I have given my findings alongwith reasons as under: Sr. Points Findings 1. Whether plaintiffs are entitled for recovery of an amount of Rs.50,530/- along with interest as claimed ? Partly affirmative 2. What order and decree ? As per final order. -- 3 of 7 -- Sum Suit 1092 of 2019 .. J/4 .. Judgment REASONS 6] In order to substantiate its claim, plaintiff company filed evidence affidavit of their authorized representative Mr. Ranabhai S. Kodiyatar vide Exh.3 and filed list of documents vide Exh.4. Though the documents were filed alongwith list of documents, but they remained to be exhibited. As the suit is exparte and original documents are filed on record, they are now marked as exhibits i.e. i) 6 Invoices are marked as Exh. 7 colly. ii) 4 cheques are marked as Exh.8 colly. iii) Copy of notice dated 28/05/2019 alongwith Postal Receipt dated 28/05/2019, Acknowledgment cards and returned envelopes are marked as Exh.9 colly. iv) Office copy of legal demand notice dated 16/07/2019 alongwith Postal Receipt dated 17/07/2019 and Return Envelops are marked as Exh. 10 colly. The plaintiff has filed close evidence pursis vide Exh. 5. AS TO POINT NO.1. 7] Heard Ld. Adv. Shivani Prasad for plaintiff and gone through the entire documents filed on record. It is the plaintiff’s case that they provided Courier Services to defendants and raised invoices and to repay the amount, four cheques were issued. When the said cheques were presented for encashment returned unpaid with endorsement, “Funds Insufficient”. In order to prove the same affidavit of evidence of authorized representative is filed which is verbatim of the plaint. In absence of cross examination, the contents of plaint, evidence and documents filed on record have gone unchallenged. The invoices Exh. 7 (colly.) reveals that the invoices were raised for the services provided to the defendants. Further cheques Exh. 8 (colly.) reveals it returned unpaid with remark, “Funds insufficient”. The legal notices at -- 4 of 7 -- Sum Suit 1092 of 2019 .. J/5 .. Judgment Exh. 9 and 10 (colly.) reveals the amount was demanded from the defendants, which they failed to pay. 8] Thus, the undisputed and unchallenged evidence of the authorized representative of plaintiff and the umpteen documents on record prove that defendants, though availing the services of the plaintiff, failed to honour the cheques. Hence, plaintiff company is entitled to recover the outstanding amount of Rs. 50,530/-. As regards the rate of interest, though plaintiff prayed 18% p.a., however, it was not an agreed rate of interest. However, considering that the transaction between the plaintiff and defendants was commercial in nature, I am of the view that 12% p.a. would be reasonable rate of interest. Hence, Point No.1 is answered accordingly. AS TO POINT NO.2: 09] In view of my finding to Point No.1, the suit is liable to be partly decreed with costs and plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs. 50,530/- with 12% p.a. In the result, I proceed to pass following order. ORDER 1. The Summary Suit No.1092 of 2019 is partly decreed with costs. 2. The defendants are hereby directed to pay to plaintiff an amount of Rs.50,530/- (Rs.Fifty Thousand Five Hundred and Thirty only) with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till realization. 3. The decree be drawn up accordingly. 4. The court fees be refunded as per rules. -- 5 of 7 -- Sum Suit 1092 of 2019 .. J/6 .. Judgment 5. The R & P be sent to Record Department. ( N. B. Lavte ) Judge, (C.R.No.83) Dt.:05/07/2025 City Civil Court, Mazgaon, MUMBAI Dictated on : 05/07/2025 Transcribed on : 08/07/2025 checked on : 08/07/2025 Signed on : 08/07/2025 -- 6 of 7 -- Sum Suit 1092 of 2019 .. J/7 .. Judgment “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 09/07/2025 at 2.45p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (Mrs. V. V. Malgaonkar ) NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge H.H.J.Shri. N. B. Lavte (COURT ROOM NO.83) Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 05/07/2025 Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 08/07/2025 Judgment/order uploaded on 09/07/2025 -- 7 of 7 --
