Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 25 Nov 2019 · CNR MHCC010100762019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 NM 3706-19 in Suit No. 1447-17 CNR NO.MHCC0101007619 IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3706 OF 2019 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 1447 OF 2017 Shri Lal Krishn Gopwani …...Plaintiff Versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai ….Defendant Coram : Sanjay N. Yadav, Judge (Court Room no. 05) Date : 25th November, 2019. Appearance: Ld. Adv. Mr. B.P. Shukla for plaintiff. Ld. Adv. Mrs. Tondwalkar for defendant/MCGM. ORDER 1. The plaintiff by this notice of motion seeks injunction restraining the defendant corporation from acting upon the Notice issued under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (herein after referred to as 'the MMC Act') dated 27.05.2017 and the order dated 25.09.2019. 2. The Schedule of the Notice dated 27.05.2017 reads as under: ''Unauthorized horizontal extension to the flat no. 01 by constructing part brick wall admeasuring 3.2m x 0.9m (ht) and part m.s. jali admeasuring 3.5m x 2.6m (ht) at ground floor Candy House Mere weather Road, Mumbai01 as shown in the sketch.'' It is not the -- 1 of 4 -- 2 NM 3706-19 in Suit No. 1447-17 case of the defendant that the plaintiff had carried out new construction. It is extension to the existing structure. The Learned Advocate for the plaintiff argued that interior were repaired in the suit premises. It is contended that no structure as alleged in the notice is constructed. The structure is in existence since last 70 years. It is for the plaintiff to show that the structures are included in the sanctioned plan or the structure existed prior to 1964. The documents filed by the plaintiff alongwith the reply are R.T.I. application. Certified copy of the plan submitted from the City Survey Office. The plan of City Survey Office does not show the internal structures in the building. It is contended that the notice structure is assessed from 1961. The flat may be assessed by the Municipal Corporation but not the notice structure. The plaintiff has failed to produced material to infer the existence of the notice structure. 3. The Hon'ble High Court in Public Interest Litigation No. 67/2017 had clarified the legal position for the benefit of this Court and benefit of all the judges in State of Maharashtra were on such grounds the suits are instituted. It had observed in paragraph no. ''5'' as follows: ''5. Concerning a property, a suit to enforce or protect an interest in the property which is governed by a Municipal Statute, the interest protected has to be with respect to a plea that primafacie, the structure which is being targeted is an authorized structure. Meaning thereby, the plaint must make an averment of the sanction obtained from the Corporation and must make an averment that the the structure targeted is primafacie governed by the sanction. Merely pointing out the deficiencies in the notice or the authority of the person issuing the notice is neither -- 2 of 4 -- 3 NM 3706-19 in Suit No. 1447-17 here nor there. Thus, the sine qua non of such kinds of suits is positive assertion made with reference to the sanctioned building plans.'' The plaintiff has failed to show the sanction/permission of the notice structure. The plaintiff has failed to make out the primafacie case in his favour. The balance of convenience does not lies in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff would not be put to irreparable loss, if the temporary injunction is refused. In the result, following order is passed. ORDER The Notice of Motion No. 3706/2019 is dismissed. (Sanjay N. Yadav) Judge, Date : 25.11.2019 City Civil Court, Mumbai. Dictated on : 25.11.2019 Transcribed on : 25.11.2019 Signed by HHJ on : 28.11.2019 -- 3 of 4 -- 4 NM 3706-19 in Suit No. 1447-17 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 28.11.2019 at 4.55 p.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mrs. K.S.Bhosale Name of the Judge (With Court Room no.) HHJ Shri. Sanjay N. Yadav C.R. no. 05 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 23.11.2019 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 28.11.2019 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 28.11.2019 -- 4 of 4 --
