Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Inayatullah Mohammed Hanif SeliyaVsThe Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay

CNR MHCC01009968201911-COURT 11 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 15th June 2024

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103077/2023
Registration Date
18 Dec 2023

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Inayatullah Mohammed Hanif Seliya

    Respondent

    1. 1The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec O39

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 29-01-2024
Business: None present for the plaintiff. The plaintiff is directed ensure due service of suit summons and to file affidavit of service on the next date.
Adjourned for writ of summons/affidavit of service to 01.04.2024.
Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2024

Date: 01-04-2024
Business: None present for the plaintiff to file writ of summons. Sufficient time is already granted. Hence, the suit is posted for dismissal.
Adjourned for dismissal to 15.06.2024.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2024

Date: 15-06-2024
Business: None present for the plaintiff. The matter is kept back.
Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/MCGM is present.
Later on 1.35 p.m.
The appearance is as above.
Order below Exhibit 01
       Even today, the plaintiff is absent to proceed with the matter. Though the matter is filed in the year of 2019, till date, the plaintiff couldn\''t ensure due service of the suit summons on the defendant, even after specific directions. It appears that he is absent since last considerable time for no justified reasons. Nor any Order, staying this proceeding, is brought to notice of this Court. It is, thus, clear that the plaintiff lost his interest in the suit. Hence, the suit stands dismissed Under Order IX, Rule 2 and 4 of the CPC, 1908. All the pending applications are filed. He is called upon to bear the costs of the litigation. Bill of costs be drawn-up accordingly. The proceeding is closed.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 15-06-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 110656/2019
Filing Date: 30-09-2019
First Hearing Date: 29th January 2024
Decision Date: 15th June 2024
Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 11  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    15 Jun 2024
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 15.06.2024
Sr. No. 35
CORAM: H.H.J. SHRI. A.G. SANTANI (C.R. NO.11)
SU 3077/23 None present for the plaintiff. The matter is kept back.
Adv. Mr. S.R. Yadav for defendant/MCGM is present.
Later on 1.35 p.m.
The appearance is as above.
Order below Exhibit 01:
Even today, the plaintiff is absent to proceed with the matter.
Though the matter is filed in the year of 2019, till date, the plaintiff
couldn't ensure due service of the suit summons on the defendant,
even after specific directions. It appears that he is absent since last
considerable time for no justified reasons. Nor any Order, staying
this proceeding, is brought to notice of this Court. It is, thus, clear
that the plaintiff lost his interest in the suit. Hence, the suit stands
dismissed Under Order IX, Rule 2 and 4 of the CPC, 1908. All the
pending applications are filed. He is called upon to bear the costs of
the litigation. Bill of costs be drawn-up accordingly. The proceeding
is closed.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.