NOTICE OF MOTION
Mahendra Govindji ShethVsSadanand S. Loonawat
CNR MHCC01009896201928-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 02nd March 2020
TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 103633/2019
- Registration Date
- 27 Sept 2019
Advocates
2For Petitioner
For Respondent
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 03-10-2019 Business: Adv. Paras for plaintiff present. Adv. Gole for deft present. Registered nm no. 3633/19 @ affidavit filed by adv. for deft. Reply given by adv. for plaintiff. Adjd. to 13.11.2019 for compliance. Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2019 Date: 13-11-2019 Business: Adv. Paras for plaintiff present. Adv. Suresh Gole for deft. Present. Date is preponed from 14.01.2020. Adjd. to 06.12.2019 for hearing . Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 06-12-2019 Date: 06-12-2019 Business: Plaintiff is present. Adv. Paras N. Vira for plaintiff present and filed rejoinder. None from defendant. Matter adjd to 15-01-2020 for Summons for judgment hearing. Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2020 Date: 15-01-2020 Business: Adv. Paras Vira for plaintiff present. Adv. Suresh Gole for defendant present. Matter adjd to 06/02/2020 for hearing Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2020 Date: 06-02-2020 Business: P.O. IS ON LEAVE Next Purpose: HEARING Next Hearing Date: 02-03-2020 Date: 02-03-2020 Business: Adv. paras vira for plaintiff Adv. Suresh Gole for defendant filed reply to SJ 39/19. Heard the LD advocates on behalf of both the parties on the NM 3633/19. It appears that the defendant could not filed the reply to SJ within stipulated time. It is contended that as the mediation process was in progress and further due to illness of the defendant, the defendant could not filed reply to the Notice of Motion. The contentions are on the affidavit. Considering the same and in the interest of justice to decide the matter allowing plaintiff\''s reply to the SJ, the notice of motion deserves to be allowed. Hence, the Notice of Motion 3633/19 is allowed subject to cost of Rs.3000/- to be paid to the plaintiff by the defendant. The defendant has paid the cost of RS.3000/- to the plaintiff. The advocate for plaintiff admitted the same. Hence, reply of the defendant to SJ be taken on record. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 02-03-2020
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 110569/2019 Filing Date: 27-09-2019 First Hearing Date: 03rd October 2019 Decision Date: 02nd March 2020 Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 102 Mar 2020
02 Mar 2020
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 67 Dt: 02.03.2020 SUM 385/18 SJ 39/19 NM 3633/19 CORAM : H.H.J SHRI. DEEPAK L. BHAGWAT(C.R.NO.28) Adv. Paras vira for plaintiff Adv. Suresh Gole for defendant filed reply to SJ 39/19. Heard the LD advocates on behalf of both the parties on the NM 3633/19. It appears that the defendant could not filed the reply to SJ within stipulated time. It is contended that as the mediation process was in progress and further due to illness of the defendant, the defendant could not filed reply to the Notice of Motion. The contentions are on the affidavit. Considering the same and in the interest of justice to decide the matter allowing plaintiff's reply to the SJ, the notice of motion deserves to be allowed. Hence, the Notice of Motion 3633/19 is allowed subject to cost of Rs.3000/ to be paid to the plaintiff by the defendant. The defendant has paid the cost of RS.3000/ to the plaintiff. The advocate for plaintiff admitted the same. Hence, reply of the defendant to SJ be taken on record. Adjd for SJ Hearing to 28042020 Judge -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.