Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 22 Nov 2021 · CNR MHCC010098772019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010098772019 Presented on 25-09-2019 Registered on 16-11-2019 Decided on 22-11-2021 Duration Yrs. M. Days 02 01 27 CNR No. MHCC010098772019 EXH.07 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO.1094 OF 2019 MR. RAJESHWAR LAXMANRAO GADGE of Mumbai an adult Indian, Inhabitant aged about 38 years, Occupation Money Lender, having his Office and residence address at Block No.1, Jaishankar Chowk Halav Pool Road, Durga Pawar Chawl, Opposite Rolex Hotel, Makadwala Compound, Kurla West, Mumbai – 400 070. ...Plaintiff. V/s. MR. BHASKAR NANOSA GUJALE of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant, age 47 years, Occupation Service, having his office address at Dharavi Bus Depot. Traffic Department, Designation Conductor, Dharavi Mumbai – 400 017. and also having his Residence address at Room No.205, Govind Nest Building No.4, Vikas Nagari Phulpada Road, Virar East District Palghar Pin Code No. 401303, and also having his native place Address at & Post Hangirge, Tq. Sangoli District Solapur, Maharashtra. ....Defendant. M -- 1 of 5 -- Summary Suit 1094 of 2019 .. J/2 .. Ex-parte Judgment Appearances: Ld. Adv Shri Balbhim S. Patil for plaintiff. None present for defendant. Suit proceeded exparte against defendant. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE SMT. R.K. KSHIRSAGAR (C.R.No.13) DATED : 22nd November, 2021. J U D G M E N T (Exparte) 1. The present Summary Suit filed by plaintiff for recovery of sum of Rs.2,95,000/(Rupees Two Lacs Ninety Five Thousand only) alongwith interest on the principal amount of Rs. 2,50,000/ (Rupees Two Lacs Fifty Thousand only) at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of filing of suit till its realisation. 2. The fact in brief are as follows. The plaintiff is the Money Lender carrying out the business of money lending under license. The defendant is serving as conducter in traffic department, dharavi Bus Depot. The plaintiff advanced and lent to the defendant a sum of Rs.2,50,000/ (Rupees Two Lacs Fifty Thousand only) on 27.04.2018 in cash. To that defendant executed demand promissory note in favour of plaintiff dated to 27.04.2018. The defendant promised to pay the principal amount with interest at the rate 18% per annum. But he failed to repay the amount. Inspite of repeated request and demand by the plaintiff defendant failed and neglected to pay the same. The plaintiff issued demands and reminders however, the defendant dishonoured the post dated cheque. The plaintiff therefore, filed the present Suit. The Plaintiff prayed for a sum -- 2 of 5 -- Summary Suit 1094 of 2019 .. J/3 .. Ex-parte Judgment of Rs.2,95,000/ with further interest on Rs.2,50,000/ (Rupees Two Lacs Fifty Thousand only) till the suit is filed. The plaintiff claimed further interest at the rate 18% p.a. and prayed to decree the suit. 3. The defendant was duly served with writ of summon. He remained absent and therefore, the suit was proceeded exparte as per order dated 20.01.2020. 4. To substantiate the claim, the plaintiff filed his Evidence affidavit vide Ex.02 and reproduced the contents of his Plaint. The plaintiff relied upon the original document which are filed vide Ex.04 and 5. 5. Heard the Learned advocate for plaintiff. The perusal of document Ex.04 the promissory note shows that the defendant obtained the amount and executed promissory note of Rs.2,50,000/ in favour of plaintiff. The plaintiff further filed the legal demand notice dated 22.03.2019, vide Ex.05. The legal notice was duly served to the defendant. 6. After going through the documents its seems that the defendant obtained the loan of Rs.2,50,000/ in cash, against it executed demand promissory note of Rs. 2,50,000/ (Rupees Two Lacs Fifty Thousand only) in favour of plaintiff. In spite of repeated request and demand defendant failed to repay the amount. He also agreed to pay the interest at the rate of Rs.18%. Even after, he was issued legal Notice, he failed to repay the same. The defendant inspite of receipt of legal notice and writ of summons, had choosen to remain absent. The defendant has failed to challenge the evidence filed in the Court. The -- 3 of 5 -- Summary Suit 1094 of 2019 .. J/4 .. Ex-parte Judgment evidence of the plaintiff has gone unchallenged. The defendant is therefore liable to pay the amount to the plaintiff. 7. It seems that the plaintiff has demanded exorbitant interest at the rate of 18% per annum. Considering the nature of transaction, the interest at the rate of 9% per annum would meet the ends of justice. I therefore, proceed to pass the following order: ORDER 1. The Summary Suit no. 1094 of 2019 is decreed with costs. 2. The defendant shall pay the sum of Rs. 2,95,000/(Rupees Two Lacs Ninety Five Thousand only) to the plaintiff with interest on the principal amount of Rs.2,50,000/ (Rupees Two lacs Fifty Thousand Only) at the rate of 9 percent p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till its realisation. 3. Decree be drawn up accordingly. 4. Court fee be refunded to the plaintiff if any as per rules. 5. Judgement dictated and pronounced in open court. R and P be sent to Record Department. ( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar ) Judge, (C.R.No.13) Dt.: 22112021 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI Direct typed on : 22112021 Checked on : 22112021 Signed on : 22112021 ( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar ) Judge, (C.R.No.13) Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI -- 4 of 5 -- Summary Suit 1094 of 2019 .. J/5 .. Ex-parte Judgment “CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 29.11.2021 at 05.10 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (YATISH R. JAGDALE) NAME OF TYPIST Name of the Judge H.H.J.Smt.R.K.Kshirsagar (COURT ROOM NO.13) Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 22.11.2021 Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 22.11.2021 Judgment/order uploaded on 22.11.2021 -- 5 of 5 --
