Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mr. Mahdukar Ramji Raut +2 moreVsMr. Piyush N. Mehta +2 more

CNR MHCC01009787201963-COURT 63 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 29th September 2021

TrustJury record updated 23 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103593/2019
Registration Date
25 Sept 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    6

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr. Mahdukar Ramji Raut
    2. 2Mrs. Shila Madhukar Raut
    3. 3Mr. Amar Madhukar Raut

    Respondent

    1. 1Mr. Piyush N. Mehta
    2. 2Mr. Dharmendra N. Mehta
    3. 3M/s. Prime Enterprises

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 23-10-2019
Business: Adv. Raut for plaintiff present.
Affidavit of service of nm filed by plaintiff. t.o.r.
NM is served upon defts.
Adjd. for nm reply to 08.01.2020.
LO
Adv. Madhukar for deft. Present.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 08-01-2020

Date: 08-01-2020
Business: Plaintiff No.1 Madhukar Raut in person present.
Adv. Madhukar Yelutla for defendants holding for Adv. Rajesh Naik present.
The defendants did not file reply to the NM.
Adv. Yelutla requested to adjourn the matter. He submtted that the defendants have challenged the order dtd. 02.08.2019 regarding condition to deposit the amount and the matter has been fixed before the Hon\''ble High Court on 24.02.2019.
However, this court must note that there has been no stay to the operation of the order dtd. 02.08.2019. In these circumstances this court has no option but to proceed with the matter particularly when the plaintiff has been insisting for proceeding with the matter as there has been no stay.
Considering overall circumstances as a last chance the matter is adjourned with clear instructions to the defendants that unless stay is granted to the operation of order dtd. 02.08.2019 the same and the proceeding cannot be kept in abeyance. Hence, the matter will proceed and if the defendants failed to file the reply adverse orders may be passed against the defendants.
Adjd to 20.03.2020 for Reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 20-03-2020

Date: 20-03-2020
Business: As per office order no. 66/2020 Board is Discharge
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 10-09-2020

Date: 10-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 12-11-2020

Date: 12-11-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 09-02-2021

Date: 09-02-2021
Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff
None for defendant.
Adjd to 08-03-2021 for filing register NM and no reply order.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 08-03-2021

Date: 08-03-2021
Business: Plaintiff present. Adv. Nishigandh patil for plaintiff
None for defendant
Adv. For plaintiff filed
Pursis- Exh.11
The plaintiff has not tendered the registered NM 3593/19 on record. Vide pursis Exh.11 the plaintiff withdrawn the Notice of Motion 3593 of 2019. Hence, the notice of motion 3593 of 2019 is disposed as withdrawn by the plaintiff.
Adjd to 17-04-2021
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2021

Date: 17-04-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2021

Date: 29-09-2021
Business: Advocate Nishigandh Patil for plaintiff is present.
None present for defendant.
NM No.3593/19 is already disposed off on 08.03.2021, but not removed from CIS. Hence, today NM No.3593/19 removed from CIS.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 29-09-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 110376/2019
Filing Date: 25-09-2019
First Hearing Date: 23rd October 2019
Decision Date: 29th September 2021
Court Number And Judge: 63-COURT 63 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    29 Sept 2021
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 63 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0103593/2019
1.Mr. Mahdukar Ramji Raut 2.Mrs. Shila Madhukar Raut 3.Mr. Amar Madhukar Raut Vs 1.Mr.
Piyush N. Mehta 2.Mr. Dharmendra N. Mehta 3.M/s. Prime Enterprises
Date : 29-09-2021
Business : Advocate Nishigandh Patil for plaintiff is present. None
present for defendant. NM No.3593/19 is already disposed
off on 08.03.2021, but not removed from CIS. Hence, today
NM No.3593/19 removed from CIS.
Nature of Disposal : OTHER
Disposal Date : 29-09-2021
COURT 63 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.