Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01009741201905 Oct 2021
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 05 Oct 2021 · CNR MHCC010097412019

Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: 1 NM 3574/19 in SUM Suit 692/2018
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3574 OF 2019
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 692 OF 2018
CNR NO. : MHCC010097412019
Dilip Kumar B. Jain …Plaintiff
Versus
Suresh Bajaj ...Defendant
Appearance:
Mr. C. D. Mishra , Advocate for the Plaintiff.
Ms. Pallavi Singh I/b Ms. Saveena Bedi , Advocate for the Defendant.
CORAM : SMT. S.S. NAGUR,
JUDGE, (C.R.NO.04)
DATE : 05/10/2021
ORDER
1) The Notice of motion is filed by defendant to condone
delay of three days to file appearance. The notice of motion is
supported by affidavit of Suresh Bajaj stating that the summons was
served not at the residence nor in the place of business in Mumbai. He
resides in Secunderabad, Telangana. The writ of summons was received
by his son at Mumbai. Therefore there is delay to appear in the suit and
prayed to allow the application. The plaintiff filed reply through
affidavit of Dilipkumar Jain and denied the contents of Notice of
Motion.
3) Heard Adv. Mr. C. D. Mishra for plaintiff and adv. Pallavi
Singh for defendant. Perused contents of notice of motion and reply
supported by affidavit.
4) There is delay of only three days to file appearance. No
prejudice will cause to the plaintiff incase the defendants are allowed to
file their appearances. The defendant in the Notice of motion is prayer
(c) has sought relief to hear and adjudicate their application dt.
-- 1 of 3 --
2 NM 3574/19 in SUM Suit 692/2018
27.11.2018. The said relief cannot be in the form of relief. Once the
application is filed the same has to be decided by the Court. Therefore
the said relief in the notice of motion is not tenable. Hence pass
following order :
ORDER
1. The notice of motion is allowed.
2. The delay of three days is condoned and defendants are
allowed to file appearance.
3. No order as to costs.
4. Accordingly, Notice of Motion is disposed of.
(SMT. S.S.NAGUR )
Judge
Dt.: 05/10/2021 City Civil Court,
Gr. Mumbai
Dictated and typed on : 05.10.2021
Pronounced on : 05.10.2021
Signed on : 05.10.2021
-- 2 of 3 --
3 NM 3574/19 in SUM Suit 692/2018
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER”
UPLOAD DATE TIME NAME OF TYPIST
06/10/2021 2.55 p.m. Mr. Mohit M. Patange
Name of the Judge HHJ Smt. S.S. Nagur
(C.R.NO.04)
Date of Pronouncement of
Judgment/Order.
05/10/2021
Judgment/order signed by P.O on 05/10/2021
Judgment/order uploaded on 06/10/2021
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.