Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Hafizur Raheman S - o GulamAkhtarVsBambeshwar Sudarshan Jaiswar

CNR MHCC0100954220192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 10th January 2020

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103496/2019
Registration Date
19 Sept 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 25-09-2019
Business: dv. Shukla for Plaintiff present.
Adv. M.D. Pandey for defendant present.
Defendant tendered 2 original notice of Motion no NM 3496/19 and NM 3497/19 t.o.r. Copy given to other side
Adjd. to 19.10.2019  for  Reply
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 19-10-2019

Date: 19-10-2019
Business: Adv. Ashitosh Shukla
Adv. M.B. Pandey for defendant
Adv. For plaintiff sought time to file reply
O- Time is granted.
Adjourned to 20.11.2019 for reply.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2019

Date: 20-11-2019
Business: Adv. Shukla for plaintiff present.
Adv. M. T. Pandey for defendant present.
Plaintiff filed reply to notice of motion Nos.3496 of 2019 and 3497 of 2019.
Copy is given to other side.
Adjourned for rejoinder and NM hearing to 05.12.2019
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2019

Date: 05-12-2019
Business: Adv. Yadav for plaintiff present.
Adv. M.D. Pandey for defendant present.
KB
LO
Adv. Shukla for plaintiff present.
Order below NM No.3497/19.
Perused Notice of motion, affidavit in support of it, reply of plaintiff.
Heard Ld. Advocate for parties.
Notice of motion is taken out by defendant to set aside order dated 12.07.2019 on the ground that due to heavy rain he and his Advocate could not attend Court on 26.06.2019. On 12.07.2019 defendant was at his native place, so he could not communicate about date of the matter to his Advocate. Consequently, his Advocate could not attend Court and impugned order came to be passed relating to proceeding of suit without cross-examination on behalf of defendant. In above circumstances, defendant prayed for setting aside impugned order.
Plaintiff filed reply to Notice of motion and opposed it on the count that ample opportunity has been given to the defendant to cross examine P.w.1 but he failed to cross examine plaintiff. Defendant has not made out any case to set aside impugned order. Accordingly, he prayed for dismissal of Notice of motion.
       Considering the reason assigned by the defendant, I am of the view that for the fault if any, on the part of his Advocate, party should not suffer. Therefore, in the interest of justice and fair trial, I am inclined to allow present Notice of motion subject to costs. Hence, pass following order.
ORDER
1. Notice of motion No.3497/19 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (c) subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/-(Rupees One Thousand Only) to the plaintiff within period of two weeks. Defendant is at liberty to deposit costs payable to the plaintiff in Court.
2. On payment of costs by defendant, he is at liberty to cross examine P.w.1.
3. Accordingly, Notice of motion is disposed of.
Adj for hearing on NM no.3496/19 to 10.01.2020.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-01-2020

Date: 10-01-2020
Business: Adv. Shukla for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mishra for defendant present.
Plaintiff present.
Adv. for defendant orally requested to extend the time for compliance of order dated 5.12.2019.  Three weeks time is granted to make compliance of said order.
Defendant paid costs in terms of order dated 5.12.2019 to the adv. for plaintiff who accepted costs on behalf of plaintiff.
Adv. for defendant not pressed NM No. 3496/19.
Order -
As NM No. 3496/19 is not pressed by defendant. Therefore, NM 3496/19 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Now matter is posted for cross-examination of PW1 13.02.2020
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 10-01-2020

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 110128/2019
Filing Date: 19-09-2019
First Hearing Date: 25th September 2019
Decision Date: 10th January 2020
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1
10 Jan 2020
Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 10.01.2020
SU 2689/14
NM
3496/19
CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02)
Adv. Shukla for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mishra for defendant present.
Plaintiff present.
Adv. for defendant orally requested to extend the time for
compliance of order dated 5.12.2019. Three weeks time is
granted to make compliance of said order.
Defendant paid costs in terms of order dated 5.12.2019 to the
adv. for plaintiff who accepted costs on behalf of plaintiff.
Adv. for defendant not pressed NM No. 3496/19.
Order
As NM No. 3496/19 is not pressed by defendant.
Therefore, NM 3496/19 is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Now matter is posted for crossexamination of PW1
13.02.2020
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.