Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 16 Sept 2022 · CNR MHCC010094082019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: ..1.. IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3448 OF 2019 (CNR NO.MHCC01009408 2019 ) IN SUIT NO. 3334 OF 2018 Peer Mohd. Gafoor Mohd Shaikh ) (Since deceased) through his legal heirs ) 1a. Mrs. Nazneen Shaikh And Ors )..Plaintiffs V/s. Mrs. Saeeda Anwar Khan ).. Defendants Appearances : Ld. Adv. M. A. Parab for plaintiff. Ld. Adv. Suresh Gole for defendant. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHAIKH AKBAR SHAIKH JAFAR COURT ROOM NO.03 DATE : 16/09/2022. ORDER 1 This motion is taken out by defendant contending that the plaint discloses the relationship of plaintiffs and defendant as gratuitous licensee and landlord, therefore, this Court has no jurisdiction to try and decide the suit. Consequently, prayed for framing of preliminary issue under section 9A of CPC as to whether this Court has jurisdiction to try and decide this suit. -- 1 of 4 -- ..2.. 2 The plaintiff resisted the contention by filing reply contending that the provisions of Section 9A of Code of Civil Procedure has been deleted by virtue of Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Ordinance 2018. He also denied the contention of defendant that defendant is gratuitous licensee but claiming him a trespasser and prayed for dismissal of motion. 3 It is not disputed that now the provision of Sec.9A of Code of Civil Procedure, came to be deleted. However, as per law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a case of, Nusli Neville Wadia V/s. Ivory Properties & others, reported in MANU/SC/1376/2019 and by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, in a case of, Shabbir Ibrahim Mestry & another V/s. Anjum Rahim Mestry & others, reported in 2020(2) MLJ 374, the preliminary issue, which is framed by the Court before date the commencement i. e. 27/06/2018 of an amendment of Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2018, are to be decided as if, the provisions of section 9A of Code of Civil Procedure has not been deleted. And if, any petition pending for framing for preliminary issue on date the commencement i. e. 27/06/2018 of an amendment of Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2018, same may be disposed off adding the issue of jurisdiction with the other issues. In the instant matter, the motion for framing preliminary issue is filed on 16/09/2019, consequently, the motion for framing preliminary issues as per the provisions of section 9A of Code of Civil Procedure is not tenable. -- 2 of 4 -- ..3.. 4 At the most, while framing issues, the issue regarding the jurisdiction may be included. After framing of issues the defendant is at liberty to apply for deciding the issue of jurisdiction as preliminary issue under Order 14 Subrule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure. 5 In view of legal position of law, the motion deserves to be dismissed. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order. ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No.3448 of 2019 in Suit No.3334 of 2018 is hereby dismissed. 2. Notice of Motion stands disposed off accordingly. (Order dictated & pronounced in open Court) (Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Jafar) Judge, City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai Dated : 16/09/2022 C.R. No.03, Dictated on : 16/09/2022 Typed on : 16/09/2022 Signed on : -- 3 of 4 -- ..4.. “Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order”. 20/09/2022 ( Vidya Abhijit Mande) at about 5.00 p.m. Stenographer (GradeI.) Court Room No.03, Gr. Mumbai Name of the Hon'ble Judge : Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Jafar, Judge, City Civil Court & Addl. Sessions Judge Court Room No.03, Gr. Mumbai Date of pronouncement of Order : 16/09/2022 Order signed by Hon'ble Judge on : 17/09/2022 Order uploaded on : 20/09/2022 at about 5.00 p.m. -- 4 of 4 --
