Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01009392201902 Jul 2022
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 02 Jul 2022 · CNR MHCC010093922019

Order Details: Copy of Judgment
Pdf Text: Judgment 1 Guardian Petition No. 271/2019
Received on : 22.11.2019
Registered on : 29.11.2019
Decided on : 02.07.2022
Duration : 02 07 04
Y M D
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY.
GUARDIAN PETITION NO.271 OF 2019
(CNR No.MHCC01 0093922019)
Bhavika Sandeep Kanaskar
Age: 39 years, Occ: Service,
R/o: Sane Guruji Nagar, Near
Water Tank, Room no.1, Asalfa
Tekadi, Rahiwasi Mitra Mandal,
Asalfa Village, Barve Nagar,
Mumbai 400 084. ...Petitioners
V/s.
Arti Pramod Kale
Before ReMarriage Name Arti
Ravindra Panmand
Age: 33 years, Occ: Service,
R/o: Ravindra Panmand, H 74,
Sundar Bag. Asalfa M.G.S. Road,
Ghatkopar, Mumbai 400086. ...Respondent
Appearance :
Mr. A.K. Yadav Advocate for the Petitioners.
CORAM : S.M. MENJOGE, THE ADDL.
JUDGE (C.R.17)
DATE : 02/07/2022.
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioner Bhavika Sandeep Kanaskar is the sister of Ravindra
Panmand. The Ravindra Panmand had married with the present
respondent Arti they begotten three daughters namely Namrata,
-- 1 of 3 --
Judgment 2 Guardian Petition No. 271/2019
Asthami and Pooja, out of said wedlock. They are minor. The Ravindra
expired on 11/11/2013. His death certificate is filed on record. After
the death of Ravindra the respondent Arti remarried with Pramod
Shivaji Kale. Their marriage certificate is filed on record. The grand
parents of the minor daughters are already expired. The applicant is
the only nearest relative of the minor. She is taking the care of the
minor daughters since 15/10/2017. The notice was issued to
respondent and also in the news paper Active times dated 2/4/2022
calling upon the public, the objection if any. But none appeared.
Considering the documents on record and the fact that the interest of
the applicant is not against the minor daughters of the deceased
Ravindra and respondent Arti, the applicant is entitled for her
appointment as a guardian of Namrata, Asthami and Pooja. Therefore,
I am of the opinion that applicant is the fit person to appoint her as a
legal guardian of minors. Hence, I pass the following order.
ORDER
1. Guardian Petition No.271/2021 is allowed.
2. Petitioner Bhavika Sandeep Kanaskar is appointed as a
legal guardian of minor daughters, Namrata, Asthami and
Pooja, born on 03/03/2008, 03/11/2009 and 22/10/2010
respectively for their welfare and interest, till they attain
the age of majority.
3. Guardian Petition No.271/2021 stand disposed of
accordingly.
( S.M. MENJOGE )
Addl. Judge
City Civil & Sessions Court,
Gr. Bombay.
Dictated on : 02.07.2022.
Transcribed on : 02.07.2022.
Date of sign : 02.07.2022.
-- 2 of 3 --
Judgment 3 Guardian Petition No. 271/2019
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED
JUDGMENT/ORDER”
02.07.2022. Mrs. S.S.Sawant
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (with Court Room
No.)
S.M. MENJOGE, Addl. Judge,City Civil &
Sessions Court, (C.R.No.17).
Date of pronouncement of /Order 02.07.2022.
Order signed by P.O. on 02.07.2022.
order uploaded on 02.07.2022.
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.