Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 28 Jan 2021 · CNR MHCC010093262019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: CS No.1647/2019 ..1.. MHCC010093262019 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1647 OF 2019 IN S.C. SUIT NO. 1944 OF 2000 (Disposed of) Yunus Miya Shaikh Ali Teli (Deleted since Deceased) 1(A) Rabiya Yunusmiya Shaikh 1(B) Haji Miya Yunusmiya Shaikh 1(C) Nurjehan Mohammed Yasin Shaikh D/o Yunusmiya Shaikh Ali Shaikh 1(D) Mohammed Yusuf Yunusmiya Shaikh. 1(E) Mohammed Amin Yunusmiya Shaikh. 1(F) Mohammed Yasin Yunusmiya Shaikh. 1(G) Mohammed Rafiq Yunusmiya Shaikh. 1(H) Hasina Abdul Jabbar Shah D/o Yunusmiya Shaikh Ali Shaikh .. Plaintiffs Versus Smt. Ruksana Ali Raza Shah ... Defendant. And 1(B) (a) Mrs. Rashida Hajimiya Shaikh (wife) 1(B) (b) Mr. Imtiaz Hajimiya Shaikh (Son) 1(B) (c) Ms. Yasmeen Hajimiya Shaikh (daughter) 1(B) (d) Mrs. Parveen Asif Shaikh (daughter) 1(B) (e) Naazmeen Munaf Shaikh (daughter) 1(B) (f) Jabeen Shakil Chowkar (daughter)-(Deceased) -- 1 of 6 -- CS No.1647/2019 ..2.. And 1(B) (f) (a) Mohammed Tabish Shakil Chowker (B) (f) (b) Mohammed Tabrez ShakilChowker ...Applicants. Appearance Adv. Harsha Shah for plaintiff/applicants. Ayyaz Aliraza Shah, Aftab Aliraza Shah, Altaf Aliraza Shah and Samina Yakub Sayed, Legal Heirs of sole defendant. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE Sunil T. Soor. (COURT No.: 2) DATED : 28th January, 2021 ORAL ORDER Heard both parties on Chamber Summons no. 1647/2019 moved on behalf of plaintiffs for deleting names of plaintiff no.1(A), plaintiff no.1(B), plaintiff no.1(B) (f) and brining their legal heirs on record, and carrying out amendment in Consent Terms filed on 18.01.2006 as per the schedule annexed with the chamber summons. 2. Perused the chamber summons alongwith affidavit, affidavit in reply of the sole defendant and proceedings of the case. 3. From the perusal of proceedings of the case, it appears that plaintiff had filed the above suit for injunction restraining the defendant from encroaching upon and carrying on any construction on the plot admeasuring 6 ¾ Gunthas i.e., 650 B, Survey No.154, Hissa No.3, City Survey No.1279 situated at Village-Marol, Tal-Andheri (East), Mumbai 400059. Suit was decreed and disposed of by Consent Terms filed on 18.01.2006. According to the Consent Terms, defendant shall get property bearing CTS No.1279 admeasuring 302.42 sq. mts. and plaintiff were to get property bearing CTS No.1279 admeasuring 329.35 sq. mts. -- 2 of 6 -- CS No.1647/2019 ..3.. 4. According to plaintiffs, they and the defendant have taken possession of their respective plots as per Consent Terms and their name are mutated in the record of rights vide mutation entry no.2895. Mutation entry is filed on record at Annexure 1. 5. Original defendant had developed portion of her land after taking possession of plot admeasuring 302.42 sq. mts. and constructed a structure ground plus one and created third party rights. Ground floor is occupied by her children. 6. Plaintiffs desire to sell their portion of plot and negotiated with Saifee Foundation and Mr. Zuzer Bhato for sale of their plot. However proposed purchaser pointed out the mistakes in the plan annexed to the Consent Terms. In clause 2 of the Consent Terms, the word “green” needs to be added and the word “red” needs to be deleted. In clause 3 of the Consent Terms, the word “red” needs to be added and the word “green” needs to be deleted. In clause 5 of the Consent Terms, the word “red” needs to be added and the word “green” needs to be deleted. Hence said error is to be rectified to complete the sale transactions. 7. Plaintiff no.1(A) is expired on 24.12.2012, plaintiff no.1(B) is expired on 13.01.2016 and plaintiff no.1(B) (f) is expired on 28.01.2019. Their legal heirs as mentioned in the schedule are to be brought on record. Plaintiff no.1(E) is expired on 11.03.2005 as divorcée having no legal heirs hence his name is required to be deleted. Hence advocate for the plaintiff prayed for allowing the chamber summons in terms of prayer clause (a) to (c) by condoning the delay in terms of prayer clause (d). -- 3 of 6 -- CS No.1647/2019 ..4.. 8. It is to be mentioned that the sole defendant filed reply and opposed the present chamber summons. Pending the present chamber summons, sole defendant expired on 08.08.2020 and her husband also expired on 04.11.2020. Hence plaintiff took out another Chamber Summons no.99/2021 to bring legal heirs of sole defendant on record. Death certificates of the sole defendant and her husband are filed on record. Legal heirs of sole defendant i.e., Ayyaz Aliraza Shah, Aftab Aliraza Shah, Altaf Aliraza Shah and Samina Yakub Sayed appeared before the Court on 14.01.2020 and they have given no objection to allow both chamber summons i.e., Chamber Summons no.1647/2019 and 99/2021. 9. Section 153 of the Civil Procedure Code (the CPC) provides general power to amend. According to section 153 of the CPC, the Court may at any time, and on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it may think fit, amend any defect or error in any proceedings in a suit, and all necessary amendments shall be made for the purpose of the real question or issue raised by or depending on such proceeding. 10. Suit is already disposed of in view of consent terms filed on 18.01.2006 and consent decree is drawn. From the perusal of chamber summons alongwith documents, it appears that typographical errors in the consent terms filed on 18.01.2006 came to notice of plaintiffs when they started negotiation with Saifee Foundation and Mr. Zuzer for sale of their plot. Further legal heirs of sole defendant given no objection to allow the chamber summons. Under the facts and circumstances, Chamber Summons is liable to be allowed. Hence following order. ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No. 1647 of 2019 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) to (c). -- 4 of 6 -- CS No.1647/2019 ..5.. 2. Delay in filing chamber summons is condoned in terms of prayer clause (d). 3. Plaintiffs shall carry out the amendment the plaint as per schedule within 14 days from the date of this order. 4. Chamber Summons No. 1647 of 2019 is disposed of. 5. After compliance of this order, R & P be sent back to the record Department. (Sunil T. Soor) Judge Date : 28.01.2021 Gr. Mumbai. Typed on : 28.01.2021 HHJ signed on : 28.01.2021 -- 5 of 6 -- CS No.1647/2019 ..6.. “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 28.01.2021, 2.30 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME Mrs. V. N. Rajgole. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.2) H.H.J. Shri. S. T. Soor C.R.No.02 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 28.01.2021 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 28.01.2021 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 28.01.2021 -- 6 of 6 --
