Full Order Text
Interim Order 5 · 24 Apr 2024 · CNR MHCC010092352019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: NM No. 101082 / 2023 Ashok - Rajesh Order (Exh.6) 1 of 4 City Civil and Sessions Court, Mazgaon, Greater Mumbai Court Room No. 31 – Commercial Court (Additional District Judge : Vijay S. Hingne, LL. M.) MHCC010030282023 Notice of Motion Filed : 14.03.2023 Arguments heard : 24.04.2024 Decided on : 24.04.2024 Duration : 01 Y, 01 M, 10 Days Exhibit No.6 Commercial Suit No. 100134 / 2019 Notice of Motion No. 101082 / 2023 Plaintiffs 1 M/s. Ashok Commercial Enterprises. 2 Ramesh Uttamchand Ramchandani. VERSUS Defendant : Rajesh Jugraj Madhani Appearances Plaintiff : Adv. Ms. Neuty Thakkar Defendant : Adv. Shri Hardik Desai. Notice of Motion for setting aside Order Dt. 01.11.2022. ************************************************************************ ORDER (Pronounced on this 24th Day of April, 2024) Defendant has filed present Notice of Motion for setting aside Order Dt. 01.11.2022, whereby the right of defendant to file admission and denial was closed by the Court. -- 1 of 4 -- NM No. 101082 / 2023 Ashok - Rajesh Order (Exh.6) 2 of 4 Case of plaintiff : 2) Plaintiff No. 1 M/s. Ashok Commercial Enterprises is registered partnership firm of plaintiff No. 2 Ramesh Uttamchand Ramchandani, Mumbai, Maharashtra, (hereinafter, Plaintiffs / P1 / P2). Plaintiffs are in business of property and financing. Rajesh Jugraj Madhani, Mumbai, Maharashtra, (hereinafter, Defendant) is Director of M/s. Mighty Construction. 3) To overcome immediate financing crisis, defendant requested . ₹ 50,00,000/- from plaintiff. Accordingly, on 27.05.2015, plaintiff advanced said financial help through RTGS. On 05.08.2015, defendant acknowledged the liability and issued two cheques, Dt. 30.10.2015 for . ₹ 50,00,000/- (principal amount) and . ₹ 2,33,333/- (interest). However, both cheques were dishonoured for insufficiency of funds. Hence, plaintiff preferred present Commercial Suit No. 100134 / 2019 for recovery of . ₹ 90,24,460/- with interest @ 12 % per annum. Chronology in the Suit : 4) Perusal shows that, after Suit was filed on 27.09.2019, the relevant dates and court business, is as follows : Date Events 09.09.2019 Suit is filed. 22.11.2019 Summons for Judgment is filed. 06.02.2020 Defendant appeared. 10.03.2021 Written Statement of defendant came on record (Notice of Motion No. 841 / 2020 is allowed). 11.08.2021 Summary Judgment is rejected. Suit is adjourned for framing of issues. 30.08.2021 Suit is adjourned for framing of issues. 21.09.2021 Suit is adjourned for framing of issues. 22.11.2021 Suit is adjourned for framing of issues. 28.01.2022 Suit is adjourned for admission and denial. 03.03.2022 Suit is adjourned for admission and denial. 30.03.2022 Suit is adjourned for admission and denial. 13.06.2022 Suit is adjourned for admission and denial. -- 2 of 4 -- NM No. 101082 / 2023 Ashok - Rajesh Order (Exh.6) 3 of 4 22.07.2022 Suit is adjourned for admission and denial. 11.08.2022 Suit is adjourned for admission and denial. 12.09.2022 Suit is adjourned for admission and denial. 07.10.2022 Suit is adjourned for admission and denial. 01.11.2022 Plaintiff filed admission and denial. My Learned Predecessor observed that, defendant failed to file admission and denial. Hence, he directed the Suit to proceed without admission and denial of defendant. Suit adjourned for framing of issues. 14.03.2023 Notice of Motion No. 101082 / 2023 filed by defendant for setting aside Order Dt. 01.11.2022. Notice of Motion No. 101083 / 2023, filed by defendant for rejection of the Plaint. Notice of Motion No. 101082 / 2023 (Exh. 6, Dt. 14.03.2023) : 5) Through this Notice of Motion, defendant claimed that, it is necessary for defendant to bring its admission and denial. Else, defendant will suffer serious prejudice. Delay occurred in filing admission and denial is not deliberate. Most importantly, the Court is yet to frame the issues. Plaintiff, through reply at Exh.8 (14.09.2023), opposed the Notice of Motion. Points for determination : 6) Heard Learned Counsels. Perused Record. Points for determination, findings and reasons are as follows : Points Findings 1. Is defendant entitled for setting aside Order Dt. 01.11.2022?....... In the Affirmative. 2. What Order?................................ As per final Order. R E A S O N S Reasons as to Point No. 1 & No. 2 : 7) If any party, for technical reasons, is deprived of raising its case, then it may result in improper adjudication. That may lead to complexity and multiplicity of litigation. It then drags the -- 3 of 4 -- NM No. 101082 / 2023 Ashok - Rajesh Order (Exh.6) 4 of 4 parties into further litigation, causing serious prejudices to them. Hence, it is always in interest of justice that, contesting parties are provided sufficient opportunities to raise their contentions. 8) Though right of defendant to file admission and denial was closed by the Court on 01.11.2022, however, thereafter till date, because of pending Notices of Motion, Issues could not be framed. As Issues are yet to be framed, then defendant can be permitted to file, admission and denial. 9) However, considering delay caused (30.08.2021 to 14.03.2023), cost is justified. In given facts and circumstances, cost of . ₹ 3,000/- would be just, legal and proper. Hence, Points are so answered and Notice of Motion is disposed off, by following Order : ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No. 101082 of 2023, is allowed, subject to Cost of . 3,000/- ( . Three Thousand Only). ₹ ₹ 2. Defendant shall pay said Cost by next date. 3. If defendant pays the Cost to plaintiff by next date, then delay caused to defendant, in filing his Admission and Denial shall stand condoned. Then, the Admission and Denial be taken on record, forthwith. 4. If defendant fails to pay the Cost, then the Suit shall proceed further. 5. Parties be informed about their right to challenge this Order and period of limitation for it. 6. Order pronounced in Open Court. 7. Record of Notice of Motion shall be part of main Commercial Suit No. 100134 / 2019. Mumbai Dated : 24.04.2024 (Vijay S. Hingne) Additional District Judge, Court Room No.31 - Commercial Court, City Civil & Sessions Court, Mazgaon, Greater Mumbai Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS -- 4 of 4 --
