Full Order Text
Order 1 · 09 Sept 2019 · CNR MHCC010091762019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Unregistered NM No. in Suit No.9406/2019 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY UNREGISTERED NOTICE OF MOTION NO. OF IN SUIT NO. 9406 OF 2019 M/s. Sovereign Tech Engineering Services Ltd and Anr. …. Plaintiffs Versus Aditya S. Bhujle ….Defendant Appearance: Adv. Rushi Narvekar, Advocate for plaintiff. Adv. Mannadiar, Advocate for defendants. CORUM : SMT. S.S. NAGUR, AD HOC JUDGE & ASST. SESSIONS JUDGE, (C.R.NO.13) DATE : 07/09/2019 ORAL ORDER 1) The unregistered notice of motion is filed by plaintiff seeking temporary injunction thereby restraining defendant from publishing, circulating, sending/printing and or distributing any emails, letters, circulars, or such other materials/ communication containing false, baseless, irresponsible, derogatory and /or such other communications which tantamount to malicious and defamatory imputations concerning the plaintiffs, the management and the operations of the plaintiffs company to any person, institution, authority or forum whomsoever. 2) The plaintiff has filed the suit under section 3638 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking permanent injunction thereby restraining defendant from the above acts as prayed in the ...1/ -- 1 of 4 -- Unregistered NM No. in Suit No.9406/2019 2 temporary injunction for which the notice of motion is filed. The plaintiff has shown the cause of action arose on 29.07.2019 when he came to know about the circulation/publication of baseless, irresponsible and derogatory remarks about the management and the operations of plaintiff's company with chartered bank, Fort, Mumbai. 3) The defendant to the service of notice of motion appeared and filed affidavit in reply of the defendant to the notice of motion. 4) Heard Adv. Narvekar for plaintiff and Heard Adv. Mannadiar for defendant. Adv. for plaintiff argued on the point of adinterim relief prayed in the notice of motion. I have heard argument of both the sides on adinterim relief at length. 5) Order 39 Rule 3 of Code of Civil procedure provides for grant of adinterim relief in case the notice is not issued to the other side and there is possibility of injury and or damage, danger in the disputed property of the plaintiff. On service of notice the defendant appeared and has filed reply. Therefore once reply is filed by the defendant it will be in the interest of justice to hear notice of motion and pass the final order in the notice of motion. Hence the suit is fixed on 09.09.2019 at 3.00 pm for argument of both the parties to the notice of motion by granting leave to plaintiff to register notice of motion. 6) Adv. for defendant has relied on authority reported in Best sellers Retail India Pvt Ltd Vs. Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited and Ors. (2012) Supreme court cases 792. The ratio ...2/ -- 2 of 4 -- Unregistered NM No. in Suit No.9406/2019 3 of the authority is in respect of settled principle of law to grant injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code. The said authority will be considered at the time of order in notice of motion. (S.S. Nagur) Date : 07/09/2019 AdHoc Judge & Asst. Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai. Dictated on : 07/09/2019 Transcribed on : 07/09/2019 Signed on : 07/09/2019 ...3/ -- 3 of 4 -- Unregistered NM No. in Suit No.9406/2019 4 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT, COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” DATE & TIME OF UPLOADING : NAME OF TYPIST 09/09/2019 & 5.50 pm : Mr. M. M. Patange Name of the Judge (with Court no.) : HHJ Smt. S.S. Nagur (CR no. 13) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/ : 07.09.2019 Order Judgment/Order signed by the P.O. on : 07.09.2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on : 09.09.2019 ...4/ -- 4 of 4 --
