Date: 30-08-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 01-11-2019
Date: 01-11-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 13-01-2020
Date: 13-01-2020
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 13-03-2020
Date: 13-03-2020
Business: Plaintiff present and her advocate absent.
Defendant no. 1 present.
Def. No. 2 and his advocate present
Advocate Kumawat for defendant/BMC present.
Adjourned for N/M Reply to 29/06/2020.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 29-06-2020
Date: 29-06-2020
Business: COVID-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2020
Date: 21-08-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 19-10-2020
Date: 19-10-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 22-01-2021
Date: 22-01-2021
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2021
Date: 05-03-2021
Business: None for plaintiff.
Advocate for defendant no. 1 present.
Advocate for deft/BMC present.
Adjourned for Ch/s Hearing to 25/06/2021.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 25-06-2021
Date: 25-06-2021
Business: As court is on leave. Board is discharged. Matter is adjourned.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 01-09-2021
Date: 01-09-2021
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Advocate Smt. Deepali Patil for defendant/BMC present.
Advocate for Defendant No. 2 present.
Adjd for N/M Reply to 17.11.2021
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-11-2021
Date: 17-11-2021
Business: None present for plaintiff
Advocate Smt. Deepali Patil for defendant/BMC present.
Advocate for Defendant No. 1 present and filed reply to N/M
Advocate Narvekar for Defendant No. 2 present.
Plaintiff is granted last chance to argue N/M
Adjd for N/M Reply to 14.01.2022
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2022
Date: 14-01-2022
Business: In view of office order no.7/2022 dated 07.01.2022 of Hon\''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, pursuant to circular dated 06.01.2022 of Hon\''ble Bombay High Court prescribing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in the wake of sharp surge in COVID-19 cases (all variants) and the views of stakeholders, the matter is adjourned without passing any adverse order against the party/s.
Adjd for NM Reply to 25.03.2022.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 25-03-2022
Date: 25-03-2022
Business: Advocate Raj Gopalswami for plaintiff present and filed reply to N/M No. 3316/2019 itself.
Advocate Mishra for Defendant No.1 present.
Advocate Pooja Narvekar for Defendant No.2 present
Advocate Amol Diwate for defendant No.3/BMC present.
Heard argument on both sides on Notice of Motion No. 3316/2019
Following separate order passed on Notice of Motion No. 3316/2019
ORDER
1. The Notice of Motion No.3316/2019 is allowed.
2.No written statement order passed against the defendant No. 2 is set aside and defendant No. 2 is granted permission to file written statement in the interest of justice
3. The Notice of Motion No.3316/2019 is disposed off.
Written statement of Defendant No.2 t.o.r. Marked as Exh. 02
O Read and Recorded.
Adjd for N/M 185/2020 Hearing to 27.06.2022
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 25-03-2022