Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Salvador FernandesVsCatholic Association +2 more

CNR MHCC0100902320191-COURT 01 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 16th October 2019

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103315/2019
Registration Date
30 Aug 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

4

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 09-09-2019
Business: None present.
Defendant nos. 1, 2 and 10 have not registered the NM. Put their NM for dismissal.
Adjourned for hearing on NM / dismissal of NM to 16.10.2019.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2019

Date: 16-10-2019
Business: Adv. Tejani for plaintiff present.
Adv. Choudhary  for defendant nos. 1, 2, 10, 12 and 13  present.
The Ld. Counsel for the defendant nos. 12 and 13 tendered registered NM No.  3315/19.
Plaintiff filed reply to NM no. 3315/19.
Application filed on behalf of defendant nos. 12 and 13 for sat aside the order of keeping the NM for dismissal.
O-Read application.  Heard.  In the interest of justice the order of dismissal is called back.
Heard argument of Ld. Advocate for plaintiff and defendant nos. 1, 2, 10, 12 and 13 on NM no. 3315/2019
Order below Notice of Motion No. 3315/19
The present Notice of Motion is tendered by the defendant nos. 12 and 13 inter-alia for the relief of setting aside the ex-parte order dated 23.7.2018 and condoning the delay of 411 days for filing written statement.  The Ld. counsel for the  defendant nos. 12 and 13 submitted that the the defendant nos. 12 and 13  permanently resided at  Goa.  Defendant nos. 12 and 13, after receipt of writ of summons, due to unavoidable circumstances did not file the written statement.  The defendant no. 12 is 62 years old and suffering from abscess of left leg and was operated.  He was advised for the rest of 1 month. Similarly defendant no. 13 is 65 years old and suffering from diabetes and hyper tension and he was advised by doctor to take rest.  Defendant nos. 12 and 13 contacted defendant no. 10 and decided to contest the matter.  The advocate of defendant nos.  12 and 13 advised them not to appear in the matter.  They submitted that for the above said  reasons  defendant nos. 12 and 13 could not appear in the matter.
          The Notice of Motion  is opposed by the plaintiff on the count that the defendant no. 10 who is the Attorney of defendant nos. 12 and 13 is 76 years old and when he could attend the matter then there was no impediment for these defendants to appear.  The Ld. advocate for the plaintiff further submitted that the defendant nos. 12 and 13 deliberately did not appear in the matter.  The medical certificate is not annexed.  Hence sufficient cause is not made. She would submit that the plaintiff has moved contempt Notice of Motion and thereafter these defendants appeared in the matter.   She further submitted that the same advocate represented defendant nos. 1, 2 and 10.
           On perusal of the record it appears that the writ of summons was unclaimed by defendant no. 12.  It is now settled law that when there is a postal endorsement to the effect unclaimed, it cannot be good service under law.  Defendant no. 13 was duly served in the matter.  It is contention of the defendant nos. 12 and 13 that due to their health reason and the advise given by their advocate, they did not appear in the matter. The medical certificate of defendant no .12 is filed to substantiate the contention of his ailment. The matter is at the preliminary stage.  The Notice of Motions are pending for hearing.  At this stage it appears that by exparte order substantial rights of the plaintiff are not taken away.  It would be in the interest of the parties if the matter is decided on merit.  No prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff. Even hyper technical and pedantic approach should not be adopted in dealing with such type of applications. Hence it is expedient to pass following order.
ORDER
1.   Notice of Motion No. 3315/19 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to costs of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid to the plaintiff within a period of one month from today.
2.  The payment of costs is subject precedent.
3.  On payment of costs, written statement  be taken on record.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 16-10-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 109616/2019
Filing Date: 30-08-2019
First Hearing Date: 09th September 2019
Decision Date: 16th October 2019
Court Number And Judge: 1-COURT 01 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
16 Oct 2019

Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Adv. Tejani for plaintiff present. Adv. Choudhary for defendant nos. 1, 2, 10, 12 and 13 present. The Ld. Counsel for the defendant nos. 12 and 13 tendered registered NM No. 3315/19. Plaintiff filed reply to NM no. 3315/19. Application filed on behalf of defendant nos. 12 and 13 for sat aside the order of keeping the NM for dismissal. O-Read application. Heard. In the interest of justice the order of dismissal is…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.