SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Vimal ShahVsN.K.G.S. B. Co.operative Bank Limited
CNR MHCC01009020201931-COURT 31 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--WITHDRAWL
Decision Date: 16th January 2020
TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 102435/2019
- Registration Date
- 07 Sept 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec Order 39 · Rule 1
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 30-09-2019 Business: Adv. Mr. Pankaj Bafana for plaintiff present. Adv. Mr. P. Chavan for defendant no.1 present. Adv. Mr. King Dongarwal for deft no.2 present. Exh.1- Plaint. Exh.2- Vakalatnama. Exh.3- Address Memo. Exh.4- List of documents. Exh.5- V/P of adv. Bharucha and Partners for deft no.2 NM filed by plff, copy served on deft nos. 1 and 2. Exh.6- V/P of adv. Mr. Bhadbhade, Praduman Chohan filed by deft no.1. Matter is adjd. for NM reply on 14.10.2019. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 14-10-2019 Date: 14-10-2019 Business: Adv. Pankaj Bafna for Plaintiff, registered NM No. 3673/19, copies are served. Adv.Pratik Sanghavi for Defendant no. 2 , submitted reply to NM No. - 3673/19 , copies are served. Adv Mr. Pradumna Chanvan for deft no. 1, tendered registered NM No. 3821/19. Adv Sanghavi and Adv Mr. Chavan prayed for adjournment. Matter is adjd.for reply on 23.10.2019. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 23-10-2019 Date: 23-10-2019 Business: Adv. Mr. S.K. Jain a/w adv. Mr. Bafana for plff. present. Adv. Mr. Pradumna Chauhan for defendant no.1 present. Reply to NM no.3821/19, filed by deft no.1, copy served on plff. Reply plff on NM no.3821/19. Heard part arguments of both side on one NM. It is agreed to argue on both NM on next date. Matter is adjd. for NM argument on 13.11.2019. Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2019 Date: 13-11-2019 Business: Adv. Pankaj Bafna for Plaintiff present. Adv. P. Chauhan for D/1 present. Adv. Pratik Sanghvi for D/2 present. Both parties submitted that matter is likely to be settled. Hence adjd. for Settlement to 10/12/2019. Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2019 Date: 10-12-2019 Business: Court is on leave. Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2020 Date: 16-01-2020 Business: Plaintiff is present. Advocate Pankaj Bafina for plaintiff is present. Advocate Charushila Gorak for defendant no. 1 is present. None present for defendant no. 2. Advocate for plaintiff filed withdrawal application at Exh. 07. Order below Exhibit-07 The defendant no. 1 is present and filed no objection for allowing this withdrawal of suit. The defendant no. 2 is absent. Hence, withdrawal pursis proceed without reply of the defendant no. 2. The plaintiff Vimal Shah and his advocate Pankaj Bafina are present before me. The plaintiff has admitted the contents of suit withdrawal application. Hence, read and recorded. Order passed below Exhibit-01 In view of application below Exhibit-7 for withdrawal of the suit, this suit is hereby withdrawn. No order as to costs. Court fees be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. Hence, this suit is hereby withdrawn and disposed off. NM No. 3673/19 and NM No. 3821/19 is also disposed off accordingly. Nature Of Disposal: WITHDRAWL Disposal Date: 16-01-2020
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 109585/2019 Filing Date: 29-08-2019 First Hearing Date: 30th September 2019 Decision Date: 16th January 2020 Court Number And Judge: 31-COURT 31 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 116 Jan 2020
16 Jan 2020
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 16.01.2020 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. R.V.KOKARE (C.R.31) 1. SU 2435/19 @ NM 3673/19 NM 3821/19 Exh. 07 Plaintiff is present. Advocate Pankaj Bafina for plaintiff is present. Advocate Charushila Gorak for defendant no. 1 is present. None present for defendant no. 2. Advocate for plaintiff filed withdrawal application at Exh. 07. Order below Exhibit07: The defendant no. 1 is present and filed no objection for allowing this withdrawal of suit. The defendant no. 2 is absent. Hence, withdrawal pursis proceed without reply of the defendant no. 2. The plaintiff Vimal Shah and his advocate Pankaj Bafina are present before me. The plaintiff has admitted the contents of suit withdrawal application. Hence, read and recorded. Order passed below Exhibit01: In view of application below Exhibit7 for withdrawal of the suit, this suit is hereby withdrawn. No order as to costs. Court fees be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. Hence, this suit is hereby withdrawn and disposed off. NM No. 3673/19 and NM No. 3821/19 is also disposed off accordingly. Judge -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
