Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Shivaji Bapu KatkarVsMHADA And Ors

CNR MHCC0100893220198-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 31st January 2023

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103283/2019
Registration Date
28 Aug 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Respondent

  1. 1MHADA And Ors

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 18-10-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 10-01-2020

Date: 10-01-2020

Date: 10-11-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Mangal Kadam present for defendants/MHADA.
F.R.S.R. following order is passed on Notice Of Motion No. 704/2021.
                                        ORDER
1) Notice of Motion No. 704/2021 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2) Notice of Motion no. 3283/2019 be restored to its original stage.
3) Notice of Motion No. 704/2021 is disposed off accordingly.
Authenticated copy of Roznama be given to both the parties if
requested.
Matter adjourned for reply/hearing on nm no. 3283/2019 to 13/12/22.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2022

Date: 13-12-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv Mangal Kadam present for defendant/MHADA.
As plaintiff and his adv are absent.
Matter adjourned for No reply order on Notice of Motion no. 3283/2019 & hearing on Notice of Motion no. 3283/2019 to 25.01.2023.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 25-01-2023

Date: 25-01-2023
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Mangal Kadam present for defendants/MHADA.
As plaintiff and his adv. are absent, and failed to file reply to nm no. 3283/2019, Notice of Motion 3283/2019 be proceeded without reply of plaintiff.
Heard arguments of ld. Advocate for defendants on nm no. 3283/2019.
As plaintiff and his adv. are absent, plaintiff could not be heard.
Matter adjourned for order on nm no. 3283/19 to 27-01-23.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 27-01-2023

Date: 27-01-2023
Business: None present for plaintiff.
None present for defendant.
As court is busy in hearing arguments on Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) of Notice of Motion no. 396 of 2023 in suit st. no. 1024/2023. Hence, Matter adjourned for nm order to 31-01-2023.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 31-01-2023

Date: 31-01-2023

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 109542/2019
Filing Date: 28-08-2019
First Hearing Date: 18th October 2019
Decision Date: 31st January 2023
Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

3
Final Order 2Full order available
31 Jan 2023

Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 NM 328319 IN SUIT 276018 MHCC010089322019 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3283 OF 2019 IN SUIT NO.2760 OF 2018 Shivaji Bapu Katkar ] ...Plaintiff. Versus MHADA & Others ]…Defendants. Appearance: Ld. Advocate Mangal Kadam for Defendants/MHADA. CORAM : K.P. KSHIRSAGAR JUDGE, (C.R.NO.08) DATE : 31/1/2023 ORAL ORDER 1) Defendants have taken out present notice of motion for condonation of delay in filing their written statement…

Read Full Order
Interim Order 1
10 Jan 2020
Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0103283/2019
Shivaji Bapu Katkar Vs MHADA And Ors
Date : 10-01-2020
None present for the Plaintiff and the Defendant. None present for the Defendant.
Since 18.10.2019 adv for Defendant nos. 1 and 2 has not tendered registered N/M no.
3283/19 on record and adv for the Plaintiff has not taken draft N/M for registration.
Therefore both Notice of Motion are dismissed for want of prosecution.
-- 1 of 1 --
Order 1
10 Jan 2020
Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0103283/2019
Shivaji Bapu Katkar Vs MHADA And Ors
Date : 10-01-2020
None present for the Plaintiff and the Defendant. None present for the Defendant.
Since 18.10.2019 adv for Defendant nos. 1 and 2 has not tendered registered N/M no.
3283/19 on record and adv for the Plaintiff has not taken draft N/M for registration.
Therefore both Notice of Motion are dismissed for want of prosecution.
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.