Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Pradeep Hariram OberoiVsMCGM

CNR MHCC01008859201911-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 23rd September 2019

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
103245/2019
Registration Date
27 Aug 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 28-08-2019
    Business: Advocate Mohit Jadhav for plaintiff present and filed original Notice of Motion No.3245/19 along with affidavit in support of Notice of Motion. T.O.R.
    Advocate Ms. Shriya Aamin h/f adv. Parshurame for defendant/MCGM present.
    Received Commissioner Report. TOR and marked as
    Exh. 6.
    Copy of commissioner report is served to advocate for plaintiff and defendant.
    KB
    LO at 3.50 pm,
    Advocate Mohit Jadhav for plaintiff present
    Adv. Parshurame for defendant/MCGM present.
    Advocate for defendant submitted that he will tender additional documents on record. He seeks time. Time is granted.
    The advocate for plaintiff as well as defendant consented for hearing of the motion finally.
    Earlier order to continue till next date.
    The case is adjourned to 30.08.2019 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 30-08-2019
    
    Date: 30-08-2019
    Business: Advocate Mohit Jadhav for plaintiff present
    Advocate Parshurame for defendant/MCGM present and filed additional list of documents. TOR and marked as Exh. 7.
    Earlier order to continue till next date.
    The case is adjourned to 05.09.2019 for NM hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 05-09-2019
    
    Date: 05-09-2019
    Business: Advocate Mohit Jadhav for plaintiff present and filed rejoinder. TOR.
    Advocate Parshurame for defendant/MCGM present.
    Heard advocates for both parties.
    Earlier order to continue till next date.
    The case is adjourned to 11.09.2019 for NM order.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 11-09-2019
    
    Date: 11-09-2019
    Business: Advocate Mohit Jadhav for plaintiff present.
    Advocate Mr. Giri h/f adv. Parshurame for defendant /MCGM present.
    Earlier order to continue till next date.
    The case is adjourned to 19.09.2019 for NM order.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 19-09-2019
    
    Date: 19-09-2019
    Business: Advocate Megha Shigwan h/f adv. Mohit Jadhav for plaintiff present.
    Advocate Parshurame for defendant/MCGM present.
    Papers received from Decree department today morning.
    Earlier order to continue till next date.
    The case is adjourned to 23.09.2019  for NM order.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2019
    
    Date: 23-09-2019
    Business: Advocate Kajal Chaurasiya h/f adv. Mohit Jadhav for plaintiff present.
    Advocate Parshurame for defendant/MCGM present.
    F.R.S.R. following order is passed in Notice of Motion No. 3245/19 -
                                   ORDER
    Notice of Motion No.3245/19 is dismissed with costs.
    Advocate for plaintiff filed application seeking extension of ad-interim injunction. TOR and marked as Exh. 8.
    O-Otherside to say.
    Say filed by advocate for BMC on overleaf the application.
    Perused. Heard.
    Advocate for plaintiff submitted that the NM is dismissed today however, till today the status-quo was granted by the Court. He requested to extend it for eight weeks as plaintiff intends to prefer and appeal from order before the Hon\''ble High Court. According to him if the status-quo is not extended, defendant will demolish the suit premises causing irreparable loss to the plaintiff.
       On the other hand, advocate for defendant opposed such request by the plaintiff on the ground that, the motion is already dismissed on merits and if now, the status-quo is extended, then in effect it will amount to  stay the implementation and execution of impugned notice and order.
         Having heard the advocates for the parties to the suit and considering the circumstances, to my mind the status-quo can be extended by a week to afford an opportunity to the plaintiff to approach the Hon\''ble High Court in appeal and further to see that the situation would not be irreversible by the time plaintiff prefers an appeal. Hence the order-
                                             ORDER
    1. Application Exh. 8 is partly allowed.
    2. Parties are directed to maintain status quo for a period of one week from today
    3. Costs in cause.
    The case is adjourned to 07.12.2019 for framing issues.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 23-09-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 109419/2019
    Filing Date: 27-08-2019
    First Hearing Date: 28th August 2019
    Decision Date: 23rd September 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    23 Sept 2019

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: :1: NM 324519 IN SU 229719 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3245 OF 2019 IN L.C. SUIT NO.2297 OF 2019 Pradeep Hairiram Oberoi ]...Plaintiff Versus The Municipal Corpn. of Gr. Mumbai ]...Defendant CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI A.N. MARE (C.R. No.11) DATE : 23rd September, 2019. Mr. Mohit Jadhav, Advocate for Plaintiffs. Mr. Parshurame, Advocate for defendant/B.M.C. O R A L O R D…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.