Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 21 Sept 2024 · CNR MHCC010087592019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: ..1.. Summary Suit No.953/2019 MHCC010087592019 Presented on : 22/08/2019 Registered on : 24/09/2019 Decided on : 21/09/2024 Duration : 05Y 01M 01D IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT, GREATER MUMBAI AT MAZGAON EXHIBIT NO.12 SUMMARY SUIT NO.953 OF 2019 (CNR NO.MHCC01-008759-2019) Mr. Santosh Nagurao Gadge, of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant, Occupation Money Lender, carrying said money lending business at Room No.4, N. M. Gadge Chawl, Makadwala Compound, Jai Shankar Chowk, HalavPool Road, Kurla (W), Mumbai – 400 070. ] ] ] ] ] ] ..Plaintiff V/s Mrs. Sanjana Santosh Gaikwad, of Dadar Mumbai, an adult, Indian Inhabitant, Occupation Service, having her office address at Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Employee No.4268592, Ps. No. F/South Ward, B.M.C. Office, Saff Safai Khatte, 01st floor, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Road, Parel East, Mumbai-400 019, and also having her residence address at Room No.42, Building No.04, 04th floor, B.M.C. Labour Vasahat, Gautam Nagar, Dadasaheb Phalke Marg, near to Dadar Station, Dadar East, Mumbai – 400 014. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ..Defendant Appearance :- Learned Advocate Balbheem Patil for plaintiff. None for defendant ( Ex-parte). -- 1 of 6 -- ..2.. Summary Suit No.953/2019 CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHAIKH AKBAR SHAIKH JAFAR COURT ROOM NO.84. DATE : 21/09/2024. J U D G M E N T 1 This summary suit is filed for recovery of amount under the demand promissory note. The plaintiff has come with the case that he had advanced loan of Rs.2,50,000/- to the defendant, who executed a demand promissory note on 20/06/2017. The defendant had agreed to repay the amount of Rs.2,50,000/- on demand alongwith interest at the rate of 18% per annum. However, defendant did not pay the loan amount, therefore, plaintiff is entitled for recovery of amount alongwith interest at the rate of 18% per annum. 2 The writ of summons was served upon defendant, but she failed to appear before the Court. Hence, as per the order in roznama dated 10/01/2020, suit proceeded ex-parte against defendant. 3 Having regard to the contentions of plaintiff, following points arise for my determination and I have recorded my findings thereon for the reasons thereunder :- POINTS FINDINGS 1 Does the plaintiff prove that defendant has executed demand promissory note of Rs.2,50,000/- ? Affirmative 2 Does the plaintiff prove that he is entitled to charge interest as prayed for ? Partly Affirmative -- 2 of 6 -- ..3.. Summary Suit No.953/2019 POINTS FINDINGS 3 Is the plaintiff entitled for the reliefs sought ? Partly Affirmative 4 What order ? As per final order. R E A S O N S 4 In order to substantiate the contentions, plaintiff entered the witness box and relied on various documents under list (Exhibit-08). Heard learned advocate for plaintiff. As to point Nos.1 to 3 :- 5 Plaintiff has tendered his affidavit of examination in chief (Exhibit-06) and additional affidavit of evidence (Exhibit-07) alongwith documents as per list (Exhibit-08). On perusal of certified copy of demand promissory note (Exhibit-09), it reveals that it bears signature and thumb impression of defendant. Inconsequence of failure to pay the amount under the demand promissory note, plaintiff has issued a notice (Exhibit-10) on 08/05/2018. Thus, plaintiff is entitled for recovery of amount under the demand promissory note. Plaintiff is a money lender having license bearing No.RBE-700, hence, he is entitled to recover the amount as a money lender. He filed another document related to his license. Thus, there is no reason to disbelieve the contentions of plaintiff, which remain unchallenged. Hence, suit deserves to be decreed as per the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure. 6 There is nothing on record to show that the defendant has ever paid any amount under the demand promissory note. The absence -- 3 of 6 -- ..4.. Summary Suit No.953/2019 and omission on the part of defendant to appear before the Court on being served with the writ of summons shows that she has no substantial defence and has admitted the claim of plaintiff. Therefore, it is established that the defendant has executed the demand promissory note for Rs.2,50,000/-. 7 So far as interest is concerned, the plaintiff is claiming interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the defendant, however, I am of the view that it is an exorbitant rate of interest. No doubt the plaintiff has suffered loss in business and profit, due to failure to repay the amount by the defendant. Had it been paid to the plaintiff as per demand, he would have invested and would have earned profit therefrom. Therefore, I am of the view that the plaintiff is entitled for interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of issuance of notice by the advocate of plaintiff i.e. 08/05/2018, till its full realisation. In view of above discussions, I answer point No.1 in affirmative and point Nos.2 and 3 in partly affirmative. 8 As the defendant has made plaintiff constrained to file the suit, she is also liable to pay the costs. In the result, I proceed to pass the following order :- ORDER 1. Summary Suit No.953 of 2019, is hereby partly decreed with costs. 2. Plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- alongwith interest at the rate of 9% per annum from 08/05/2018, till its full realisation from the defendant. -- 4 of 6 -- ..5.. Summary Suit No.953/2019 3. Court fees, if any, be refunded as per rule. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (Judgment dictated and pronounced in open Court) ( Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Jafar ) Judge, City Civil Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai, C.R. No.84. Date: 21/09/2024. Dictated and Typed on : 21/09/2024. Signed by HHJ on : 21/09/2024. -- 5 of 6 -- ..6.. Summary Suit No.953/2019 “Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order”. 24/09/2024 at about 11.37 a.m. (Ms. Sonali S. Sawant) Stenographer (Grade-III) Name of the Hon'ble Judge : Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Jafar, Judge, City Civil Court & Addl. Sessions Judge, Court Room No.84, Mazgaon, Mumbai Date of pronouncement of Order : 21/09/2024 Order signed by Hon'ble Judge on : 21/09/2024 Order uploaded on : 24/09/2024 at about 11.37 a.m. -- 6 of 6 --
