Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 10 Feb 2022 · CNR MHCC010087552019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Summary Suit 914 of 2019 .. J/1 .. Exparte Judgment MHCC010087552019 Presented on 22-08-2019 Registered on 16-09-2019 Decided on 10-02-2022 Duration Yrs. M. Days 02 05 19 CNR No. MHCC010087552019 EXH. 09 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 914 OF 2019 AMBALAL RIKHABCHANDJI JAIN Age 55 years of Mumbai, an adult Indian inhabitant, carrying on business of Money Lending as a Sole Proprietor in the name and style of Ritik Creation at and from Room No.20, Ground Floor, Gulam Mohmad Building, Navroji Hill Road No.7, Dongri, Mumbai – 400 009. ...Plaintiff. V/s. 1. NILESH DATTARAM KAMBLE Age not known of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant working for gain BMC, “C” Ward, Shreekant Palrekar Marg, Chandanwadi, Mumbai – 400 002. Emp Code No.4247146. Residing at Tranzist Camp, Room No.3, Near BMC “B” Ward Office, Babula Tank Cross Lane, Mumbai – 400 009. 2. SHALINI NILESH KAMBLE Age not known of Mumbai an adult Indian, inhabitant Residing at Tranzist Camp, Room No.3, Near BMC “B” Ward Office, Babula Tank Cross Lane, Mumbai – 400 009. ....Defendant -- 1 of 6 -- Summary Suit 58 of 2021 .. J/5 .. Exparte Judgment Appearances: Ld. Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff. None present for defendants. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE SMT. R.K. KSHIRSAGAR (C.R.No.13) DATED : 10th February, 2022 J U D G M E N T (Exparte) 1. The present suit is filed for recovery of amount of Rs.1,12,587.39/ (Rupees One Lakh Twelve Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Seven and Thirty Nine Paise Only) alongwith further interest on the principal amount of Rs.80,000/(Rupees Eighty Thousand only) at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of suit till its actual realisation. 2. The facts in brief are as follows: The plaintiff is a businessman. The defendant No.1 is working in BMC and Defendant No.2 is the acceptor of the demand bill of exchange on 02.04.2017. defendant No.1 for valuable consideration of Rs.80,000/ drew a demand bill of exchange on defendant No.2 in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff paid the amount of Rs.80,000/ On 03.05.2017 the plaintiff presented the demand bill of exchange to both the defendants but the defendants failed to pay the amount. The plaintiff on several occasions called upon the defendants to pay the sum of Rs. 80,000/ alongwith interest at the rate of 18% per annum but the defendants on one or other pretext failed to make the payment. -- 2 of 6 -- Summary Suit 58 of 2021 .. J/5 .. Exparte Judgment On 23.02.2019 plaintiff issued legal notice calling upon the defendants to pay the amount but the defendant inspite of receipt of Notice failed to pay the amount. The plaintiff therefore filed the present suit and prayed to decree the suit. 3. The defendants were duly served but they failed to appear and therefore, suit was proceeded Exparte against defendants as per order dated 21.09.2021. 4. The plaintiff filed his claim affidavit vide Exh.03 alongwith list of documents vide Exh.4. The plaintiff filed the demand bill of exchange dated 02.04.2017 alongwith Office copy of legal notice dated 23.02.2019 vide Exh.6. It seems that the present suit is based on the demand bill of exchange executed by the defendant No.1 in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant No.2 also signed the bill of exchange as acceptor. The defendant No.1 received the amount of Rs.80,000/ on 02.04.2017 but thereafter failed to acknowledge the amount. The defendant Nos.2 also failed to pay the sum of Rs.80,000/ and thus the defendants dishonoured the Bill of Exchange. The plaintiff therefore, filed the present suit. The documents at Exh.5 shows that the bill of exchange bears the signatures of defendant No.1 and 2. The defendants also received the Notices but they failed to comply the same. It therefore seems that the defendants are liable to make the payment. 5. The defendant No.1 and 2 failed to appear before the Court. They failed to challenge the oral and documentary evidence of plaintiff. They failed to crossexamine P.W.1. The evidence of plaintiff has therefore gone unchallenged. The plaintiff proved that a bill of exchange was drawn by defendant No.1 in favour of plaintiff and it was -- 3 of 6 -- Summary Suit 58 of 2021 .. J/5 .. Exparte Judgment accepted by defendant No.2 On failure of defendant No.1 to pay the amount the defendant No.2 was liable to make the payment but she also failed to pay the same. Hence, plaintiff is entitled for the decree. 6. The plaintiff demanded the principal amount with further interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The interest at the rate of 18% per annum is exorbitant and therefore, it cannot be granted to the plaintiff. Considering the nature of transaction the interest at the rate of 9% per annum will suffice the purpose of justice therefore, I, proceed to pass the following order: ORDER 1. The Summary Suit no. 914 of 2019 is decreed with costs. 2. Defendant No.1 and 2 shall jointly and severally pay the amount of Rs.1,12,587.39/ (Rupees One Lakh Twelve Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Seven and Thirty Nine Paise Only) to the plaintiff along with interest at the rate of 9 percent per annum on the principal amount of Rs.80,000/(Rupees Eighty Thousand only) from the date of filing suit till its actual realisation. 3. Decree be drawn up accordingly. 4. Court fee if any be refunded as per rules to the plaintiff. 5. Judgment is dictated and pronounced in open court. R and P be sent to Record Department. ( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar ) Judge, (C.R.No.13) Dt.: 10022022 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI -- 4 of 6 -- Summary Suit 58 of 2021 .. J/5 .. Exparte Judgment Directly typed on : 10022022 checked on : 10022022 Signed on : 10022022 ( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar ) Judge, (C.R.No.13) City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI -- 5 of 6 -- Summary Suit 58 of 2021 .. J/5 .. Exparte Judgment “CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 10.02.2022 at 4.05 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (SIDDHESH SHIRKE) NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge H.H.J.Smt.R.K.Kshirsagar (COURT ROOM NO.13) Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 10.02.2022 Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 10.02.2022 Judgment/order uploaded on 10.02.2022 -- 6 of 6 --
