Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Komal Vineet DujodwalaVsReligare Finvest Ltd. +1 more

CNR MHCC0100873820193-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--PLAINT REJECTED
Decision Date: 05th March 2020

TrustJury record updated 22 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102880/2019
Registration Date
04 Nov 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec Order 39(1)

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-11-2019
    Business: Adv. Kharatmol for plaintiff present and seeks leave to serve of fresh writ of summons.
    O-Issue fresh writ of summons.
    Matter stands Adj for service of writ of summons to 24.01.20.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 24-01-2020
    
    Date: 24-01-2020
    Business: Adv. Shinde for plaintiff present and filed draft N/M alongwith affidavit. Leave granted to regard the N/M and he seeks time to file Affidavit of service
    Adv. Chinmayee Ghag for defendant no.2 present and filed VP.
    VP filed by Ld Counsel for defendant no.2.
    Matter stands Adj for affidavit of service to 13.03.2020.
    Next Purpose: SERVICE
    Next Hearing Date: 31-01-2020
    
    Date: 31-01-2020
    Business: By praecipe matter is taken on today\''s board.
    Adv. Nikhil Patil with Adv Gajanan Shinde for plaintiff present and filed original Nm no. 434/20 along with affidavit. He also filed affidavit of NM no. 434/20.
    Adv. Nishant Rana for defendant no. 2 present and filed draft NM along with affidavit. Leave granted to register draft NM. He undertakes to serve the plaintiff well in advance before next date.
    Heard Ld. counsel for both the sides regarding grant of interim relief to the plaintiff as per prayer clause (a) of the motion. Ld. counsel for defendant has opposed the request for grant of interim relief and submitted that plaintiff\''s suit is itself not maintainable and this court has no jurisdiction. He also submitted in this regard that he also taken out a draft motion today itself. He will be submitting reply to motion taken out by the plaintiff by next date. Hence, prayed for any early date.
    In view of the above, no order is passed regarding interim relief in the matter.
    Hence, Matter stands Adj for filing reply and hearing on NM on 05.02.2020.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 05-02-2020
    
    Date: 05-02-2020
    Business: Adv. Nikhil Patil with Adv Gajanan Shinde for plaintiff present and filed original writ of summons.
    Adv. for defendant no. 1 present and filed original NM no. 539/20 along with affidavit.
    Adv. Nishant Rana with Adv. Chinmayee Ghag for defendant no. 2 present and filed reply to NM no. 434/20. Copy served on other side.
    Heard both sides on NM no. 539/20 for some time.
    Ld. counsel for both the sides fairly submitted that pleadings in the motion are complete. they have no objection to frame the preliminary issue as to the jurisdiction of the court in view of NM no. 539/20 filed by the defendants and after hearing both the side to decide the same on the merits.
    In view of the above, preliminary issues are framed in the suit.
    Preliminary issues as to the jurisdiction of the court are framed.
    Matter stands Adj for hearing on preliminary issues and Nm no. 539/20 and 434/20 to 11.02.2020.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 11-02-2020
    
    Date: 11-02-2020
    Business: The court is on leave
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2020
    
    Date: 05-03-2020
    Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Nishant Rana for defendant no. 1 and 2 present.
      FRSR following order is passed below
                                      ORDER
    1.         NM no. 539 of 2020 is hereby allowed and made absolute.
    
    2.      In the present suit, the plaint is liable to rejected under order 7, Rule 11(d) of the CPC as barred by provisions of section 34 r/w section 17 SARFAESI Act, 2002 and it is rejected accordingly.
    3.         A decree shall be drawn.
    4.         Parties shall bear their own costs.
               NM no. 539 of 2020 and the suit is disposed of accordingly and so also NM no. 434 of 2020 is disposed of as infructuous.
    Nature Of Disposal: PLAINT REJECTED
    Disposal Date: 05-03-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 109266/2019
    Filing Date: 21-08-2019
    First Hearing Date: 25th November 2019
    Decision Date: 05th March 2020
    Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    05 Mar 2020
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 05.03.2020
    DB
    CORAM : HIS HONOR JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT
    SHRI. V.V. VIDWANS (Court Room No. 03)
    SU 2880/19 Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Nishant Rana for defendant no. 1 and 2 present.
    FRSR following order is passed below
    ORDER
    1. NM no. 539 of 2020 is hereby allowed and made absolute.
    2. In the present suit, the plaint is liable to rejected under
    order 7, Rule 11(d) of the CPC as barred by provisions of section
    34 r/w section 17 SARFAESI Act, 2002 and it is rejected
    accordingly.
    3. A decree shall be drawn.
    4. Parties shall bear their own costs.
    NM no. 539 of 2020 and the suit is disposed of accordingly
    and so also NM no. 434 of 2020 is disposed of as infructuous.
    Judge
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.