Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 12 Feb 2020 · CNR MHCC010086862019
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: Sum. Suit No. 880 of 2019. Filed on : 20.08.2019 Registered on : 04.09.2019 Decided on : 12.02.2020 Duration : Year-00 Month-05 Days-09 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO.880 OF 2019 (CNR NO.MHCC01-008686-2019) Exhibit-12 Premchand Gulabchandji Age : 72 years, Address: 46, Modi Street, Ground foor, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001. ….Plaintif ..Versus.. 1. C. Chinna Durai Age : Adult, Working for gain S.M. SUB, Guard No.5, CSTM, Mumbai – 400 001. PF No.0178399 Residing at : M/s. R.B.II/C, 105, Plat Form, Prs St Floor,Kalwa, Railway Colony(W), Dist – Thane – 400 605. 2. Kailash Kisan Waghmare Age : Adult, Working for gain S.M. SUB, Guard No.5, CSTM, Mumbai – 400 001. PF No.0178399 Residing at : A 501, Vinayak Park, Manda, Titwala (W), Dist – Thane – 421605. ....Defendants SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF Rs.1,02,013.69ps. Appearance:- Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for the Plaintif. Exparte against Defendants. -- 1 of 6 -- 2 Sum. Suit No. 880 of 2019 CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE SMT. S.G. SHAIKH. (C.R. NO.59). DATE : 12th February, 2020. : J U D G M E N T : 1. This is a summary suit under order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure 1908. 2. The facts of the suit are summarized as under :- The plaintif is carrying on business of money lending in Mumbai. The defendants are working in Mumbai. The plaintif advanced to the defendants the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- on 11.06.2019 in cash with interest at the rate of 1.25 percent per month for which the defendants had executed Demand Promissory note in favour of the Plaintif. The defendants had promised to pay to the plaintif the said sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest thereon, at the rate of 1.25 percent per month on demand. But, the defendants failed to pay to the plaintif inspite of demands, reminders and receipt of the legal notice dated 10.07.2019. Hence, plaintif is constrained to fle the suit for recovery of the said amount. The total suit claim of the plaintif for Rs.1,02,013.69ps. 3. The suit summons were duly served on the defendants but they failed to appear. Hence, suit is posted for judgment as per order XXXVII Rule 2 (3) of Code of Civil Procedure 1908. -- 2 of 6 -- 3 Sum. Suit No. 880 of 2019 4. The following points arise for my determination and my fndings there on are as under for the reasons stated there under :- POINTS FINDINGS 1 What is due and payable from the defendants to the plaintif ? A] If yes, what would be the rate of interest? Amount of Rs.1,02,013.69ps with interest @ 1.25% per month 2 What order and decree? Suit is decreed. R E A S O N S 5. In order to prove the case of the plaintif fled following documentary evidence. Exhibit. No. Description of documents Date 7 Promissory Note of Rs.1,00,000/- 11.06.2019 8 Plaintiffs advocate letter along with postal acknowledgment 10.07.2019 9 Money Lending License -- 10 Form under Bombay Money Lending Act. -- 11 Books of account. -- AS TO POINT NO.1 :- 6. All the documents produced by the plaintif at Exhibits-7 to 11 go to establish that plaintif has given amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to the defendants as loan. The documents further prove that the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- is due and payable to the plaintif from defendants towards the loan amount. The defendants have failed to repay the said loan amount to the plaintif. The documents at list Exhibits-7 to 11 -- 3 of 6 -- 4 Sum. Suit No. 880 of 2019 go to establish that the defendants are liable to pay Rs.1,02,013.69ps. to the plaintif on the date of fling of the suit towards the said loan amount and therefore, the defendants have failed to repay his loan amount to the plaintif. In this background, it is held that plaintif is entitled to recover sum of Rs.1,02,013.69 ps. from the defendants. 7. The plaintif has claimed 18% per annum on the principle amount. As per section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure the rate of interest may exceeds 6% per annum, if the transaction is commercial and there is no contract pertaining to the same between the parties. In the present case, the transaction is commercial one and there is such contract existing between the parties as to the rate of interest which shall be levied. Therefore, the transaction is a simple handloan transaction and rate of interest @ 1.25% per month would be just and proper to be awarded on the principle sum adjudged i.e. amount of Rs.1,02,013.69 ps. Hence, point No.1 is answered in the afrmative. AS TO POINT NO.2 : 8. In view of discussion and fnding on point No.1, it is held that plaintif is entitled to recover Rs.1,02,013.69ps. from the defendants with interest at the rate of Rs.1.25% per annum from the date of fling of the suit till its realization. Plaintif is also entitled to recover cost of the suit from defendants. Hence, in answered to point No.2, I proceed to pass the following order. -- 4 of 6 -- 5 Sum. Suit No. 880 of 2019 : O R D E R : 1. The defendants shall jointly and severally pay Rs.1,02,013.69/- (Rs. One Lakh Two Thousand Thirteen and Sixty Nine Only) to the plaintif with interest at the rate of 1.25% per month from the date of fling of the suit till its realization. 2. Defendants do pay costs of the suit to the plaintif. 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. 4. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per rule. Date :12.02.2020 (Smt. S. G. Shaikh) Ad-Hoc Judge, City & Civil Court, Gr. Bombay Typed on : 12.02.2020. Signed on : 12.02.2020. -- 5 of 6 -- 6 Sum. Suit No. 880 of 2019 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE TIME STENOGRAPHER NAME 12.02.2020 4.45 p.m. Mr. Tushar P. Kuwar Name of the Judge H.H.J. Sabiha.G.Shaikh. Ad-hoc Judge. (Court Room No.59) Date of pronouncement of Order 12.02.2020 Order signed by P.O. on 12.02.2020 Order uploaded on 12.02.2020 -- 6 of 6 --
