Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01008408201920 Feb 2020
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 20 Feb 2020 · CNR MHCC010084082019

Order Details: Chamber summons
Pdf Text: Back
Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 9 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0101500/2019
Bhupendranath Harichand Kapur - Applicants - Smt Asha B. Kapur And Ors Vs Ayodhyanath Harichand Kapur - deceased - And Ors
Date : 20-02-2020
Business : Advocate Shukla for applicants/LRs of Plaintiff present Advocate M. K. Tanna for Defendant
no.1a to 1d present ORDER ON CHS NO.1500/2019 This Chamber Summons is taken out by
applicants i.e. legal heirs of original deceased Plaintiff to bring on record those applicants as
LRs of original Plaintiff. Applicant Anil Kapoor has filed his affidavit in support of Chamber
Summons contending that original Plaintiff died on 18/05/2019 leaving behind applicant as his
LR and this Chamber Summons is taken out within 90 days from the death of original
Plaintiff. Defendants have filed affidavit of reply through Defendant Jayraj Kapoor and
contended that Chamber Summons is vexatious, false and liable to be dismissed in liminie
because Chamber Summons suffers from basic defects like schedule is not annexed to the
Chamber Summons. Further, according to Defendants Chamber Summons suffers from gross
delay. It is denied that applicant is real son of original Plaintiff. Heard advocate for Plaintiff
Mr. Shukla and advocate for Defendant Mr. M. K. Tanna. Copy of death certificate of original
Plaintiff filed on record shows that original Plaintiff expired on 18/05/2019 and this Chamber
Summons is taken out on 25/07/2019. As such, the Chamber Summons is filed within
stipulated time provided by law. Further, Defendants can disprove applicant&amp#039s
relation with original Plaintiff by cross examine applicant at relevant time and by adducing
cogent evidence to prove the fact that applicant is not son of original Plaintiff.
Plaintiff&amp#039s advocate pointed out that before Hon&amp#039ble High Court
in suit no.3255/1995 Defendants have admitted that applicants are legal heirs of original
Plaintiff Bhupendranath. Defendants advocate submitted that said admission was given on the
basis of letter sent by applicants. Any how, the relation between applicants and original
Plaintiff can be proved and disproved by the parties at relevant time and as the Chamber
Summons is taken out within 90 days from the death of original Plaintiff, I find that it is
necessary to be made absolute. Hence, I proceed to pass following order- ORDER 1. Chamber
Summons no.1500 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 2.
Applicants are directed to carry out proposed amendment in the plaint within stipulated time
provided by law. 3. Applicants are further directed to serve the copies of amended plaint upon
Defendants and to file typed copy of amended plaint for the record of the court. Case is
adjourned to 22/04/2020 for Compliance.
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.