Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 05 Sept 2022 · CNR MHCC010082532019
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 05.09.2022 Sr. No. 56 CORAM: H.H.J. SHRI. A.G. SANTANI (C.R. NO.11) SU 1573/15 NM 3017/19 Adv. Mr. V.T. Dubey for the plaintiff is present. Adv. Ms. Farjana for defendant No.1 is present. Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant No.2/MCGM is present. The following order is passed on the NM No. 3017/2019: ORDER Perused the NM and record. Heard both the sides. Having considered their submissions, at the outset, it is to be noted that while passing order on NM No. 4754/2015 on 09.10.2018, this Court observed that defendant No. 1 is carrying on construction of roof of the room, without showing anything that due permission for such reconstruction/repairs was obtained. It further seems that defendant No. 1 did not argue on the said NM. Now, by filing this NM, he is submitting that he should be given a permission for reconstruction of the said premises. The record shows that even this time, he avoided to substantiate the fact as regards his eligibility to carry such reconstruction / repairs. That apart, the suit is filed by the plaintiff for limited purpose i.e. to restrain defendant No. 1 from carrying any construction except by following the due process of law. This was also the prayer clause (a) in NM no. 4754/2015, which is made absolute in view of the above order. On this background, nothing survives to consider this NM. The said issue is already decided earlier by this Court. Therefore, defendant No. 1 is at absolute liberty to proceed as per law. Needless to say that by filing of this NM for permission, that too in absence of anything to justify his propriety, defendant No. 1 would not be exempted to follow the due process of law as directed in view of the earlier order on NM. In the circumstances, I am of the opinion that at this stage defendant No. 1 could not present a primafacie case nor balance of convenience tilts in his side. In the result, specially, in view of the earlier order on NM No. 4754/2015, this NM stands dismissed. Adjourned for framing of issues to 14.11.2022. Judge -- 1 of 1 --
