NOTICE OF MOTION
Gangadhar PujariVsMCGM And Ors
CNR MHCC01008197201912-COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 14th January 2020
TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 102992/2019
- Registration Date
- 06 Aug 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 07-08-2019 Business: Adv. Mr. Holamagi for the Plaintiff present. None present for the Defendant. Original registered N/M No. 2992/19 alongwith affidavit in support tendered by the Plaintiff. t.o.r. Matter is adjd. to 8.08.2019. Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION Next Hearing Date: 08-08-2019 Date: 08-08-2019 Business: Adv. Holamagi for the Plaintiff present. Adv. Suryawanshi for MMC/Defendant present Heard. Perused documents tendered by the Plaintiff and Defendant no. 3 alongwith WS. Prime facie documents discloses that the Plaintiff has entered into partnership deed and even he has executed affidavit cum indemnity bond on 16.06.2009, wherein he has stated that he has no complaint against the society and society office bearers i.e Topas, SRA chambers (property). Further in the said indemnity bond, the Plaintiff has stated that the Plaintiff has received possession of permanent alternate accommodation in rehab building 2nd floor, C wing Gala no. 203. even the Defendant have filed on record memorandum of understanding between Defendant no. 3 and the Plaintiff. The documents are of the year 2004, 16.06.2009, Deed of partnership dtd 5.12.2008. According to the Plaintiff, all the documents tendered by the Defendant are forged and fabricated documents. It is urged by Ld adv for the Plaintiff that all the documents tendered by Defendant no. 3 are fabricated and forged and the Plaintiff has not executed the same. In this background, Prime facie it discloses that even after filing WS by the Defendant no. 3 till filing this N/M, the Plaintiff has not challenged the said documents by making amendment in the suit plaint and even earlier the Plaintiff has not challenged above said documents. The Plaintiff has filed this suit for seeking relief of mandatory injunction. Thus Prime facie it appears that the Deputy Collector has passed order on 5.05.2018, considering allotment of respective shops by the developer in the year 2009. In such facts and circumstances, it is not just and proper to grant adinterim relief at this stage. NM is to be decided on merits and opportunity is necessary to be given to the Defendant to file reply to this N/M. Hence, adinterim relief is rejected. Matter is adjd. to 16.08.2019 for proof of service of N/M no. 2992/19/ N/M reply/ N/M hearing/ passing no WS order against the Defendant. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 16-08-2019 Date: 16-08-2019 Business: Court is on leave Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2019 Date: 19-08-2019 Business: Adjd Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2019 Date: 09-09-2019 Business: None present for the Plaintiff. Adv. Trivedi for SRA/Defendant-2 and 5 present. Adv. Ms. Chandramore for BMC/Defendant no. 1 present. The Plaintiff has not tendered registered N/M. Matter is adjd. to 16.11.2019 for reply to N/M no. 2992/19/ N/M/872/19 hearing or for dismissal order. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 16-11-2019 Date: 16-11-2019 Business: None for plaintiff present. Adv.Ms.Chandramore for BMC/deft/No. 1Present. Adv.Trivedi for defendant No.2 and 5 present. Matter adj for NM reply to 14.01.2020. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2020 Date: 14-01-2020 Business: None present for plaintiff. Hence, NM No.872/2019 is dismissed for want of prosecution and disposed off. Plaintiff has not tendered registered NM No.2992/2019. Therefore, NM No.2992/2019 is dismissed for want of prosecution and disposed off. Adv. Chandramore for defendant no.1 is present. Adv. Trivedi for defendant nos.2 and 5 is present. Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED Disposal Date: 14-01-2020
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 108744/2019 Filing Date: 06-08-2019 First Hearing Date: 07th August 2019 Decision Date: 14th January 2020 Court Number And Judge: 12-COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 114 Jan 2020
14 Jan 2020
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0100872/2019 Gangadhar Pujari - Suit St. No. 5585 of 2017 Vs The MCGM And Ors Date : 14-01-2020 None present for plaintiff. Hence, NM No.872/2019 is dismissed for want of prosecution and disposed off. Plaintiff has not tendered registered NM No.2992/2019. Therefore, NM No.2992/2019 is dismissed for want of prosecution and disposed off. Adv. Chandramore for defendant no.1 is present. Adv. Trivedi for defendant nos.2 and 5 is present. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
