Final Order 1

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Noting : 1 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
SU-9085/92
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Nichani for plaintiff present.
Adv. Amogh joshi for defendant present.
The Ld. counsel for the defendant seeks time for argument.
Adjourned for argument to 13.9.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-3252/12
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Pandey for plaintiff present.
Defendant no. 1 present.
The Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff seeks time for adducing
the evidence.
Adjourned for evidence of plaintiff to 7.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-6907/78
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Nandini Chittal for plaintiff present.
Adv. Garima Malhotra for defendant no. 1(d) present.
The Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff and defendant no.1(d)
submitted that the Hon'ble High Court has stayed the
proceedings. On previous date the counsel for the
defendant no. 1(d) was called upon to mention before the
Hon'ble High Court for early haring of the matter as this
suit is more than 40 years old. The Ld. counsel for the
defendant no. 1(d) seeks time for mentioning the matter
before the Hon'ble High Court. Hence the matter is
adjourned to 4.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-954/14
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Ghaisas for defendant no. 1 present.
Matter is adjourned for evidence as a last chance.
Adjourned for evidence of plaintiff to 10.10.2019
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-5082/08
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Sachin Choudhari for plaintiff present.
Adv. Rahul Tiwari for defendant present.
The Ld. counsel for defendant undertake to supply the copy
of the addition written statement to the plaintiff.
The Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff seeks time for evidence.
Adjourned for recording evidence to 23.9.2019.
Judge
-- 1 of 14 --
Noting : 2 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
SU-445/15
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Sachin Kadam for plaintiff present.
Adv. Siddharth Ingule for defendant present.
Plaintiff present.
The Ld. Counsel for the defendant submitted that as he is
not keeping well and seeks adjournment.
Adjourned for cross examination of PW-1 to 23.9.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-1586/18
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Anand Singh for plaintiffs present.
None present for defendants.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs seeks time for adducing
evidence.
Adjourned for evidence of plaintiffs to 20.9.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-314/15
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Sadiq Pathan for defendant present
Adjourned for framing issues to 7.9.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-2817/18
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present for plaintiff.
Last chance is granted to the plaintiff for filing affidavit of
service of writ of summons.
Adjourned for affidavit of service of writ of summons to
17.10.2019.
Judge
********************************
-- 2 of 14 --
Noting : 3 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
SU-3268/13
Exh. 29
Exh. 30
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. A. B. Shinde for plaintiffs present.
Mr. Maheshkumar Raut CA of defendant present.
Evidence closing pursis filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
O-Seen and filed.
Adjournment application filed on behalf of defendant.
O-Call say of plaintiff.
Say filed by plaintiff on Exh. 30 on application itself.
Order below Exh. 30
Read application and say. The right of defendant to cross
examine PW-1 was forfeited by the order dated. 4.7.2019.
Hence, the application needs no consideration as plaintiff
by filing pursis closed his side. Therefore, the application is
filed.
_________________________________________________
Adjourned for evidence of defendant to 7.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-7880/98
Exh. 4
Exh. 5
Exh. 6
Exh. 7
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Sameer Logade for plaintiff present.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of plaintiff. O-Seen and filed.
The Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submitted that he has filed
affidavit of examination in chief on 17.9.2014 along with
the NM. The same be taken on record along with the
compilation of the document.
Application filed on behalf of the plaintiff along with true
copy of the order of Hon'ble High court dated 25.6.2019 in
Appeal from order no. 754/15 with Civil Application No.
918/15 in Appeal from order no. 754/15. O-Seen and
filed.
Affidavit of examination in chief of the PW-1 – Mr. Vishwas
Tendulkar dated 17.9.2014.
Compilation of documents filed by the plaintiff.
O-Call say of defendant.
Plaintiff to supply affidavit of examination in chief and
compilation of documents, if already not supplied, to the
defendant.
Adjourned for reply and hearing on admissibility of the
documents to 3.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-8972/00
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Harsha Shah for plaintiff present.
Adv. Sunita Potdar for defendant present.
The Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submitted that today
witness is unable to attend the court and sought
adjournment.
Adjourned for cross examination to 30.9.2019 at 12.00 pm.
Judge
-- 3 of 14 --
Noting : 4 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
SU-4972/12
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Naqvi for plaintiffs present.
None present for defendant.
Plaintiff has complied the order and carried out the
necessary amendment.
Adjourned for framing issues to 15.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-327/90
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Plaintiff present.
Adv. D. C. Pathak for plaintiff present.
Adv. Sumandevi Yadav for defendant no. 3(d) present.
Heard the Ld. Advocate for defendant no. 3(d) and plaintiff
on Exh. 28.
Order below Exh. 28
Read application and reply. Heard. The Ld. counsel for the
defendant no. 3(d) submitted that this defendant is the
legal heir of defendant no. 3. She wish to context the suit
and therefore prayed for setting aside exparte order dated
18.1.2019.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff opposed the
application on the count that the amended copy of the
plaint along with the covering letter dated 16.10.2018 was
served upon the defendant no. 3(d) along with other
defendants. The plaintiff even served the defendants by
pasting summons and paper publication in daily news
papers widely circulated in both Marathi and English. The
defendant no. 3(d) has not given any reason for setting
aside the exparte order.
It appears that the service was made to the defendant no.
3(d) by substitute service. The defendant no. 3(d) wish to
take part in the trial. By adopting hyper technical and
pedantic approach the substantial rights of the parties
cannot be taken away. In the interest of justice the
application needs consideration. Hence it is expedient to
pass following order.
ORDER
1. Application (Exh. 28) is allowed subject to costs of Rs.
2,000/- to be paid by the defendant no. 3(d) to the plaintiff
within a period of one week from today.
2. Payment of costs is subject precedent.
3. Application is disposed of accordingly.
_______________________________________________
Adjourned for compliance to 4.9.2019.
Judge
******************************
-- 4 of 14 --
Noting : 5 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
SU-9797/82
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Bhakti Jogal for plaintiff present.
Adv. Manisha Tarkar for defendant present.
Defendant filed affidavit of service of witness summons.
Witness is not present. Defendant wish to examine the said
witness. Defendant to take steps.
Adjourned for steps to 5.9.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-2912/15
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Dalal for plaintiffs present.
Adv. Pauloni Mehta for defendant no. 1 present.
The Ld. counsel for the plaintiff seeks time for filing the
rejoinder to the reply filed by the defendants to the NM.
Adjourned for rejoinder to the NM to 24.9.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-203/17
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Sushma Keni for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mukharjee for defendant no. 5 present.
Defendant nos. 1 to 4 are exparte. The Ld. counsel for the
defendant no. 5 submitted that the defendant no. 5 was
served with the copy of the plaint and NM on 27.7.2019.
He seeks time to file written statement and reply to NM.
Time is granted.
Adjourned for Written Statement and reply to NM to
16.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-2239/17
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present.
Last chance is granted for hearing on NM.
Adjourned for NM hearing to 21.10.2019
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-6265/05
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Aditya Modi for defendant no. 1 present.
Issue writ of summons to newly added defendant nos. 2
Adjourned for affidavit of service of writ of summons to
defendant no. 2 to 14.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
M. A. 138/16
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Kunal Kumbhat for applicant present.
Adv. Sailee Gharpure for respondent nos. 1 to 3 present.
Court is busy in passing orders in other matters.
Adjourned for order to 3.9.2019.
Judge
-- 5 of 14 --
Noting : 6 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
M. A. 139/16
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Kunal Kumbhat for applicant present.
Adv. Sailee Gharpure for respondent nos. 1 to 3 present.
Court is busy in passing orders in other matters.
Adjourned for order to 3.9.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
Suit No.
1969/19
Exh. 2
Exh. 3
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Matter is pertaining to C. R. No. 4
Adv. S. Kadam for defendant present.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant. O-seen and
filed.
The Ld. counsel for the defendant submitted that the
defendant was served with writ of summons on 27.7.2019
and therefore within period he is filing the Written
Statement. Written statement is taken on record.
Written statement filed on behalf of defendant.
Matter is already adjourned to 24.9.2019
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-1215/15
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Giriraj for plaintiff present.
Adv. Rohit Joshi for defendant no. 2 present.
Heard argument of Ld. Advocate for plaintiff and defendant
no. 2 on chamber summons.
Adjourned for order on chamber summons to 3.9.2019.
Judge
**********
-- 6 of 14 --
Noting : 7 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
SU-1721/16
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Gangarkar for plaintiff present.
Adv. C. N. Gole for defendant nos. 1 to 3 present.
Plaintiff tendered registered NM No. 1671/19. TOR.
The Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submitted that he had
made service to the defendants and would file affidavit of
service.
Adjourned for reply to NM to 9.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-883/18
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Bhavna Pandey for plaintiff present.
Adv. R. S. Yadav for defendant present.
The Ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks time to file reply to NM.
Last chance is granted.
Adjourned for reply to NM to 21.9.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-505/19
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present.
Proof of service of writ of summons is not filed.
Adjourned for affidavit of service of writ of summons to
21.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-100/19
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv.Uma Sharma for plaintiff present.
None present for defendants present.
Affidavit of service filed by the plaintiff.
Earlier order if any to continue till next date.
Adjourned for order to 21.10.2019.
Judge
***************************
-- 7 of 14 --
Noting : 8 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
SU-7433/05
Exh. 7
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Rashmi Aarabekar for defendant nos. 2 and 3 present.
Application filed on behalf of defendant nos. 2 for
discharge.
Order below Exh. 7
The Ld. Advocate for defendant nos. 2 and 3 seeks
permission to withdraw the appearance on behalf of
defendant nos. 2 and 3. It appears that the Ld. Advocate for
defendant nos. 2 and 3 had issued letter to the defendant
nos. 2 and 3 which was returned unserved. Even she has
filed the copy of the email delivered to defendant nos. 2
and 3. In view of the same permission is granted to
withdraw the appearance on behalf of defendant nos. 2 and
3.
___________________________________________
Adjourned for framing of issues to 9.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-3940/09
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Singh with Adv. Anil Mishra for plaintiff present.
None present for defendants.
Heard argument of Ld. Advocate for plaintiff on both the
chamber summons.
None present on behalf of defendants. Hence, put up for
order on both the chamber summons.
Adjourned for order on both the chamber summons to
4.9.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-2044/16
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. for plaintiff present.
Adv. for defendant present.
FRSR following order is passed on Notice of Motion No.
3339/2016.
1. Notice of Motion No. 3339/2016 is dismissed.
2. Costs in the cause.
3. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly.
__________________________________________
Adjourned for framing issues to 4.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-3054/18
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. C. G. Jadhav with Adv. Shetty for plaintiff present.
Adv. Gaurav Sharma for defendant present.
The ld. counsel for the plaintiff had not pressed the Notice
of Motion No. 2917/19. Hence, the Notice of Motion No.
2917/2019 is filed.
Matter is already adjourned to 23.9.2019 for draft issues.
Judge
-- 8 of 14 --
Noting : 9 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
St. No. 9240/19
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. C. G. Jadhav with Adv. Ashok Shetty for plaintiff
present.
Adv. Gaurav Sharma for defendant present.
Plaintiff tendered registered NM no. 3216/19. TOR.
Defendant filed reply to NM. TOR.
The Ld. counsel for the defendant makes statement at bar
that till tomorrow the defendant will not take any coercive
action against the plaintiff as per notice dated 23.7.2019
and 28.7.2019.
Adjourned for hearing on NM to 27.8.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-1590/19
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Hemangi Kuber for plaintiff present.
None present for defendants.
Plaintiff tendered registered NM no. 2764/19. TOR.
Original writ of summons tendered by the plaintiff and
same is returned to the plaintiff.
Affidavit of service filed by the plaintiff. TOR.
Defendant nos. 4 to 7 are duly served as per the bailiff
report. Defendant nos. 4 to 7, despite the service, failed to
appear. Hence the suit is proceeded ex-parte against
defendant nos. 4 to 7. Plaintiff to take steps for service of
writ of summons to defendant nos. 1 to 3.
Adjourned for affidavit of service of writ of summons to
defendant nos. 1 to 3 to 22.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-6017/05
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present.
Adjourned for reply to NM to 22.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-686/16
Exh. 5
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Bhende for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mahesh Bendre for defendant no. 1 and 3 present.
Application filed on behalf of plaintiff for extension of time
for service of writ of summons.
Time is extended for service of writ of summons.
The plaintiff to provide the copy of NM to the defendant
nos. 1 and 3 without fail on or before next date, otherwise
court would proceed further in accordance with the law.
Adjourned for affidavit of service of writ of summons and
NM to defendants to 3.10.2019.
Judge
*****************************
-- 9 of 14 --
Noting : 10 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
SU-8248/02
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Nichani for plaintiff present.
None present for defendant.
Court is busy in passing orders in other matters.
Adjourned for judgment to 28.8.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-7433/05
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
LO at 4.45 pm.
Adv. Gupta for plaintiff present.
Matter is already adjourned for framing of issues to
9.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-9797/82
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
LO at 4.45 pm
Mr. Yogesh Bhat Upper Division Clerk from Registrar of
Company present. He submitted that concerned witness on
behalf ROC would come on next date.
Matter is already adjourned to 5.9.2019.
Judge
****************************
-- 10 of 14 --
Noting : 11 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
SU-2667/18
Exh. 10
Exh. 11
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. R. G. Bhat for plaintiff present.
Plaintiff present.
Defendant present.
Application filed by defendant for adjournment.
Say filed by the plaintiff on Exh. 10
Order below Exh. 10
Read application and say. The counsel for the plaintiff has
partly argued the Notice of Motions. Considering the
reason mentioned in the application adjournment is granted
as a last chance.
_________________________________________________
Undertaking filed by the defendant. O-Seen and filed.
Heard argument of Ld. Advocate for plaintiff on both the
Notice of Motions partly.
Adjourned for further argument on both the Notice of
Motions to 16.9.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-163/14
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Prathamesh Bhosale for plaintiff present.
Applicant in chamber summons present.
Defendant no. 3 present.
FRSR following order is passed on Chamber Summons No.
648/2017
1. Chamber Summons no. 648/2017 stands rejected.
2. Chamber Summons is disposed of accordingly.
_________________________________________
Adjourned for NM hearing to 15.10.2019.
Judge
26/08/2019
SU-6153/05
(Disp. Of)
Exh.
Exh.
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. Redekar for defendant present.
Mrs. Ujwala Sankpal Section Officer, Court Receiver, High
Court, Mumbai present.
Site report filed by the Court Receiver.
Application filed on behalf of defendant.
O-Call say or Court Receiver.
Adjourned for reply to Court Receiver to 30.8.2019.
Judge
*******************************
-- 11 of 14 --
Noting : 12 C. R. No. 01
26/08/2019
SU-1236/14
Exh. 57
Exh. 58
CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI M. S. AZMI (C. R. NO. 01)
Adv. C. S. Savithri for plaintiff present.
Adv. Agrawal for defendant no. 2 present.
Affidavit of examination in chief of PW-7-Vinayak
Raghunath Velhankar.
Compilation of documents filed by PW-7.
Heard argument of Ld. Advocate for plaintiff and defendant
no. 2 on admissibility of documents filed with list Exh. 58.
The document at sr. nos. 1 to 20 are the true copy of the
Return, Statement of Income, Balance Sheet and Profit and
Loss Account. The ld. Advocate for defendant no. 2
objected for marking those documents as exhibits. On
perusal of the documents it appears that there is
acknowledgment of the Income Tax Department accepting
the documents. The witness had put his signature and
given endorsement as true copy to those documents,
therefore the documents at serial nos. 1 to 20 are marked
as exhibit accordingly. The document at serial no. 21 are
the bank account statements but the bank account
statements do not bear the certificate under Banker Bookers
Evidence Act and u/s 65 B of The Indian Evidence Act as
those are computer generated copies. Hence the
documents at sr. no. 21 are not marked as exhibit. The
documents at sr. nos. 22 to 27 are original form no. 12,
hence those are marked as Exhibit accordingly. The
documents at sr. no. 28 are the copy of the Partnership
Deed dated 16.3.1993 and December 2006. The document
of partnership deed dated 16.3.1993 is photocopy therefore
it is not marked as exhibit The Ld. counsel for the plaintiff
submitted that the original deed of partnership of
December 2006 is not with the plaintiff. The plaintiff had
earlier issued the notice dated 16.5.2019 to the defendant
no. 2. The defendant no. 2 has not handed over the said
document of original partnership deed. She would submit
that the copy of the deed of partnership was prepared by
the witness and signed by the partners in his presence. She
submitted that the witness took signature of the both the
parties on true copy of the said partnership deed and
witness compared it with original. He also signed as a
witness to the said Partnership Deed. The witness from his
custody has produced the copy of the partnership deed
carrying original signature of Parshuram Uttarkar and
Arvind Uttarkar. Therefore she submitted that sufficient
material has been produced by way of evidence to lead
secondary evidence in respect of the document of
partnership deed. The Ld. counsel for the defendant no. 2
objected for marking this document as exhibit on the count
that after tendering the copy of the affidavit of evidence of
this witness to defendant no. 2 along with the document,
no notice was issued to the defendant no. 2 to produce the
original document. The evidence is not forthcoming with
whom the original Deed of Partnership is lying. He further
submitted that the deft. no. 2 is not having the custody of
the original deed of partnership. The Ld. counsel for the
plaintiff again makes the submission that the plaintiff had
-- 12 of 14 --
Noting : 13 C. R. No. 01
Exh. 59
Exh. 60
Exh. 61
Exh. 62
Exh. 63
Exh. 64
Exh. 65
Exh. 66
Exh. 67
Exh. 68
Exh. 69
Exh. 70
Exh. 71
Exh. 72
Exh. 73
Exh. 74
Exh. 75
Exh. 76
Exh. 77
issued notice to the defendant no. 2 for production of the
original partnership deed but he did not reply to the said
notice. The plaintiff is also not having the custody of
original partnership deed. At this juncture it is not coming
forward with whom the original partnership deed is lying.
The witness in his affidavit of evidence stated that the
partnership deed was prepared by him in December 2006
under the instructions of deceased Parshuram and
defendant no. 2 and handed over the original partnership
deed to them and had prepared true copy of it and after
comparing with the original he took the signature of both
the partners and he also signed the deed of partnership. At
this juncture the witness claims that the document which he
has produced is the same copy of the partnership deed
which he took from the partners of the firm. The witness
had also prepared the document and he was witness to the
document. In this background it appears that the plaintiff
has sufficiently established the fact of secondary evidence
and therefore the document is marked as exhibit.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
-- 13 of 14 --
Noting : 14 C. R. No. 01
Exh. 78
Exh. 79
Exh. 80
Exh. 81
Exh. 82
Exh. 83
Exh. 84
Exh. 85
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Certified copy of the Return, Statement of Income, Balance
sheet, Profit and Loss Account.
Original Form no. 12 carrying the original acknowledgment
of the I. T. Department.
Original Form no. 12 carrying the original acknowledgment
of the I. T. Department.
Original Form no. 12 carrying the original acknowledgment
of the I. T. Department.
Original Form no. 12 carrying the original acknowledgment
of the I. T. Department.
Original Form no. 12 carrying the original acknowledgment
of the I. T. Department.
Original Form no. 12 carrying the original acknowledgment
of the I. T. Department.
Copy of the partnership deed of December 2006.
Adjourned for cross examination of PW-7 to 30.8.2019 at
4.00 pm.
Judge
-- 14 of 14 --