Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01007968201913 Apr 2022
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 13 Apr 2022 · CNR MHCC010079682019

Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: NM No. 2881/2019 in Suit No. 817/2015 1 ORDER
MHCC010079682019
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2881 OF 2019
IN
S.C. SUIT NO. 817 OF 2015
Mr. Vinod Natesan, Advocate. … Plaintiff
Vs.
Elements Homestead Products Pvt. Ltd. … Defendants
Appearances:
Mr. Vinod Natesan, Advocate plaintiff in person present.
Ld. Advocate Mr. Ramesan for defendant present.
CORAM : HER HONOUR ADHOC JUDGE
SMT. C.V. PATIL
(C.R.NO. 15)
DATE : 13th April, 2022.
ORDER
This Notice of Motion is filed by defendant and submitted that
the plaintiff using the name and style of M/s. Mayan Consultants and
M/s. Mayan Consultants International Conveniently. The defendant
further submitted that M/s. Mayan Consultants and M/s. Mayan
Consultants International are without any legal existence and they are
just label added on to the private residential address of the plaintiff to
mislead gullible clients. The defendant submitted that the plaintiff be
directed to produced copies of Income Tax Return and Service Tax
Return filled by plaintiff in the name M/s. Mayan Consultants and M/s.
Mayan Consultants International.
-- 1 of 3 --
NM No. 2881/2019 in Suit No. 817/2015 2 ORDER
2. The said Notice of Motion strongly opposed by plaintiff. The
plaintiff submitted that the statement of defendant in the Notice of
Motion is defamatory statement. Therefore, it is necessary to take action
against defendant. The plaintiff has submitted that he is carrying on
business in the name of M/s. Mayan Consultants. Thereafter, as per
document annexureA after return in India his consultancy is known as
M/s. Mayan Consultants International. Therefore, the Notice of Motion
strongly opposed from the side of plaintiff.
3. This is the summary suit it is pending for marking of
document from the evidence of plaintiff. Thereafter, the defendant
would get opportunity to cross examined witness. Whatever defence the
defendant has raised in the Written Statement he can clarify that in the
crossexamination of the witness. At this stage before
crossexamination, it is not necessary to direct the plaintiff to file
document of Income Tax Return and Service Tax Return . Therefore,
this Notice of Motion has no substance. Accordingly, following order is
passed :
F. R. S. R. following order is passed:
ORDER
1. Notice of motion No. 2881 of 2019 is hereby dismissed.
2. Notice of motion No. 2881 of 2019 disposed of accordingly.
(C.V. PATIL)
Adhoc Judge,
Date : 13/04/2022. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay
Dictated on : 13/04/2022,
Transcribed on : 13/04/2022,
HHJ signed on : 18/04/2022.
-- 2 of 3 --
NM No. 2881/2019 in Suit No. 817/2015 3 ORDER
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
Upload Date Upload Time Name of Typist
18/04/2022 04.45 p.m. Mr. Jitesh Suresh Shinde
Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Smt. C.V.Patil (CR 15)
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGEMENT /ORDER
13/04/2022
JUDGEMENT /ORDER signed by P.O. on 13/04/2022
JUDGEMENT /ORDER uploaded on 18/04/2022
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.