Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 5

CNR MHCC01007908201901 Aug 2024
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 5 · 01 Aug 2024 · CNR MHCC010079082019

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: CS No. 100072 / 2019 Anil – M/s. Klaus Exh.16 1 / 3
Further Examination in chief of plaintiff witness Jayesh Damji
Soni on oath by Adv. Preeti Gada, for plaintiff.
Defendant side called, but absent.
1) Affidavit now shown to me bears my signature. Its
contents are true. It is already marked as Exh.16. I have filed
following document on record. Same be allotted Exhibit mark.
Exh.19 : True copy of original Power of Attorney dated
15.03.2019.
Exh.20 : True copy of Bank pass book.
Exh.21 : Bank certificate dated 22.12.2022
Exh.22 : Original Demand Promissory Note dated
24.03.2015
Exh.23 : TDS Certificate under Form 16A by defendants
updated on 18.08.2015.
Exh.24 : TDS Certificate under Form 16A by defendants
updated on 22.07.2015.
Exh.25 : TDS Certificate under Form 16A by defendants
updated on 15.07.2016.
Exh.26 : Original dishonored Cheque dated 16.01.2018.
Exh.27 : Original Bank returned memo dated 18.01.2018.
Exh.28 : Office copy of Original Demand Notice dated
30.01.2018.
Exh.29 : Postal Receipts issued by Postal authority.
Exh.30 : Postal Acknowledgment Card.
Exh.31 : Postal Acknowledgment Card.
Exh.32 : Postal Acknowledgment Card.
Exh.33 : Postal Acknowledgment Card.
Exh.34 : Postal Acknowledgment Card.
Exh.35 : Certificate u/s 64B of Indian Evidence Act.
Exh.36 : Non-starter report.
Court observation : It is made clear to both parties that,
documents are marked as Exhibit (in accordance with contents
from evidence affidavit) for identification purpose.
Both sides are at liberty to prove and disprove the contents of the
-- 1 of 3 --
CS No. 100072 / 2019 Anil – M/s. Klaus Exh.16 2 / 3
documents, in accordance with various provisions, pertaining to
Commercial Courts Act, Code of Civil Procedure, Indian
Evidence Act and Information Technology Act.
Further examination in chief is over :
Defendant side called, but absent.
Adjourned for cross-examination of P.W.1
ROAC
Mumbai
Dated : 15.01.2024
(Vijay S. Hingne)
Additional District Judge,
Court Room No.31 - Commercial Court,
City Civil & Sessions Court,
Mazgaon, Greater Mumbai
-- 2 of 3 --
CS No. 100072 / 2019 Anil – M/s. Klaus Exh.16 3 / 3
Cross Examination of plaintiff witness Jayesh Damji Soni on
oath by Adv. Prashansa Agrawal instructed by Nahush Shah
Legal for defendant.
Adv. Preeti Gada present for plaintiff.
2) I am educated upto B. Com. I am Constituted Attorney
of plaintiff Anil Dedhia. Plaintiff Anil is my cousin brother. I am
partner with plaintiff Anil in Comet Engineering Works. The
transaction is not related with Comet. Other than Comet, I do not
have any business relation with plaintiff Anil. I am not aware of
all transactions of plaintiff Anil. Jayesh Vira had introduced the
defendant with plaintiff. Jayesh Vira belongs to my village. They
all belongs to my community. The transaction is of 2015. I was
present at the time of introduction. Defendant was accompanied
with 2-3 persons. I don't know their names.
Advocate Prashansa Agrawal is seeking oral adjournment.
Plaintiff submitted for suitable order.
Hence, cross-examination is adjourned.
ROAC
Mumbai
Dated : 01.08.2024
(Vijay S. Hingne)
Additional District Judge,
Court Room No.31 - Commercial Court,
City Civil & Sessions Court,
Mazgaon, Greater Mumbai
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.