Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 14 Mar 2022 · CNR MHCC010078832019
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: MHCC010078832019 EXH. IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.209 OF 2019 SUMMARY SUIT NO.2913 OF 2013 M/s. Kimberley Engineers Pvt. Ltd. ...Plaintiff. V/s. Oriental Trimex Ltd. ....Defendants. Appearances: Ld. Adv. Mr. Aniket Patil for Plaintiff. Ld. Adv. Mr. Swatesh Tripati for defendant. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE SMT. R.K. KSHIRSAGAR (C.R.No.13) DATED : 14th March, 2022 ORDER 1. The present Summons for Judgment is taken out by the plaintiff. It was submitted that he had filed a suit against the defendant for recovery of the amount of Rs.13,11,061/ alongwith further interest. Pursuant to the purchase order the plaintiff sold and delivered the -- 1 of 4 -- SJ 209 of 2019 .. J/2 .. in Suit 1923-2013 goods to defendant. The defendant accepted the goods but thereafter failed to pay the amount. Inspite of receiving notice, the defendant failed to pay the amount. The plaintiff therefore, filed the suit for recovery of the due amount. The defendant filed his appearance only to delay the matter. He is having no defence on merits and therefore the Summons for Judgment be issued. 2. The defendant filed reply and prayed for leave to defend. It was submitted that this Court is having no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present suit. The defendant has wrongly invoked the jurisdiction of this Court by making false statement. The plaintiff is not having any cause of action. There is no signature of defendant on the invoices and the plaintiff unilateraly confirmed the invoices. There is no written contract binding on the defendants. There are triable issues and therefore unconditional leave to defend be granted to the defendant. 3. The Learned Advocate for plaintiff filed written notes of argument. The defendant failed to argue on Summons for Judgment. After going through the Summons for Judgment of the plaintiff and reply of defendant, it seems that there was a transaction between the plaintiff and defendant. The defendant allegedly accepted the goods sold and supplied by plaintiff. The defendant raised various issues which will require trial. The defendant raised legal issues which can be decided only after leave to defend is given to the defendant. In order to decide the matter on merit it is necessary to grant leave to defend to defendant. The defendant has raised issues regarding territorial jurisdiction of this Court and cause of action for filing the suit. The defendant also denied any transaction with plaintiff. The defendant -- 2 of 4 -- SJ 209 of 2019 .. J/3 .. in Suit 1923-2013 also raised the issues regarding maintainability of the suit and denied any written contract. It therefore, seems that it would be appropriate to grant leave to defend to the defendant. No prejudice will cause to the plaintiff if the leave to defend is granted to the defendant. However, if the defendant is not granted any opportunity to defend the suit, it will be defendant who will suffer irreparable loss and therefore it is necessary to grant leave to defend. Considering the nature of transaction, it seems that conditional leave to defend should be granted to defendant. I, therefore, proceed to pass the following order: ORDER 1. Conditional leave is granted to defendant to defend the suit. 2. The defendant shall deposit the amount of Rs.10,00,000/ to be paid to the plaintiff within 2 months of this order. 3. On payment of amount of Rs.10,00,000/ the defendant shall file his written statement. 4. The Summons for Judgement 209 of 2019 is disposed off. 5. Parties to bear their own costs. ( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar ) Judge, (C.R.No.13) Dt.: 14032022 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI Dictated on : 14032022 Transcribed on : 14032022 checked on : 15032022 Signed on : 15032022 ( Smt. R. K. Kshirsagar ) Judge, (C.R.No.13) City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI -- 3 of 4 -- SJ 209 of 2019 .. J/4 .. in Suit 1923-2013 “CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 15.03.2022 at 04.50 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (VARSHA U. PAWAR) NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge H.H.J.Smt.R.K.Kshirsagar (COURT ROOM NO.13) Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 14.03.2022 Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 15.03.2022 Judgment/order uploaded on 15.03.2022 -- 4 of 4 --
