Full Order Text
Order 1 · 25 Apr 2019 · CNR MHCC010078482018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 NM 2428-18 in Suit No. 2341-18 CNR NO.MHCC0100784818 IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2428 OF 2018 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 2341 OF 2018 Hanif Abdul Rehman Patni …..Plaintiff Versus The Commissioner, The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ..... Defendants Coram : Sanjay N. Yadav, Judge (Court Room no. 05) Date : 25th April, 2019. Appearance: Ld. Adv. M.H.Kazi for the plaintiff. Ld. Adv. Smt. Rawade for defendant/MCGM. ORDER 1. The plaintiff by this notice of motion seeks temporary injunction restraining the defendant corporation from revoking his license. 2. The defendant had filed the say. It was found in the inspection dated 12.01.2017, that the plaintiff had infringed the condition no. 14, no trade to be carried out on of articles to be kept outside licensed premises and found excess area used for the service purpose. The defendant in the inspection dated 15.02.2017 found the same infrunged condition. It is contended that the plaintiff was only permitted to prepare -- 1 of 3 -- 2 NM 2428-18 in Suit No. 2341-18 the Tea. It is stated that the plaintiff have breached the condition and was unable to produce that CFO requirement. The CFO requirement were not produced at the time of inspection. The plaintiff had breached the condition of license. Therefore, the defendant had revoked license issued to plaintiff. The CFO requirement were not produced at the time of inspection, it related health and was accordingly revoked. 3. Considering the fact that the health license of the plaintiff is cancelled, as he failed to produce the CFO requirement. 4. The compliance related to the health and ultimately would affect the consumers. The public at large would be affected, the interest of public at large prevails to over the interest of plaintiff. The plaintiff has failed to make out the primafacie case. The balance of convenience does not lies in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not entitled for the mandatory injunction as prayed for. The plaintiff would not be put to irreparable loss, if the temporary injunction is refused. In the result, following order is passed: ORDER The Notice of Motion No. 2428/2018 is dismissed. (Sanjay N. Yadav) Judge, Date : 25.04.2019 City Civil Court, Mumbai. Dictated on : 25.04.2019 Transcribed on : 26.04.2019 Signed by HHJ on : 30.04.2019 -- 2 of 3 -- 3 NM 2428-18 in Suit No. 2341-18 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 02.05.2019 at 3.05 pm. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mrs. K.S.Bhosale Name of the Judge (With Court Room no.) HHJ Shri. Sanjay N. Yadav C.R. no. 05 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 25.04.2019 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 30.04.2019 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 02.05.2019 -- 3 of 3 --
