Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01007825201927 Sept 2019
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 27 Sept 2019 · CNR MHCC010078252019

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: M.A.No. 72/19 in Review Petn.Stamp No. 8170/19 1 Order.
In N/m No. 1238/18 in Suit No. 7072/03.
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY.
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2019
(CNR NO. MHCC010078252019)
IN
REVIEW PETITION STAMP NO. 8170 OF 2019
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1238 OF 2018
IN
SUIT NO. 7072 OF 2003
(CNR NO. MHCC010057362003)
(HIGH COURT SUIT NO. 2967 OF 2003)
Shri Sanjay Kumar Ashta ...Petitioner/Applicant
Versus
Airport Authority of India & ors ...Respondent
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHRI G.G.BHANSALI.
(C.R.NO.31).
DATE : 27th SEPTEMBER, 2019.
Ms. Meena Ruparel, Advocate for Plaintiff.
Ms. Yasmin Sarang, Advocate for Defendant No.1.
Mr. P.D.Gandhi, Advocate for Defendant No.5.
ORDER
This is an application submitted by plaintiff for
condonation of delay of 17 days in filing review petition.
2. Heard ld. Advocate Meena Ruparel for plaintiff/applicant at
sufficient length.
-- 1 of 3 --
M.A.No. 72/19 in Review Petn.Stamp No. 8170/19 2 Order.
In N/m No. 1238/18 in Suit No. 7072/03.
3. Perused one line endorsement of defendant no.1 and 5,
who resisted strongly to condone the delay. Heard ld. Advocate Gandhi
and Sarang for defendants 5 and 1 respectively.
4. It is replied by advocate Ruparel that application for review
was filed by the plaintiff in given time, however, it was returned by the
Court for proper registration and special number to be given. This fact
is admitted by advocate Gandhi. However, he shown his readiness to
decide the review petition on merit without going into technicalities.
5. Both side are ready for argument on review petition.
Plaintiff has submitted that copy of petition is served on all defendants.
It would be appropriate to decide the matter on merit. Hence aforesaid
delay of 17 days is condoned. Hence the order :
ORDER
1. Misc. Application No. 72/2019 is allowed, no order of cost.
2. Impugned delay of 17 days is condoned. Parties to argue
on review petition.
3. M.A.No. 72/19 is disposed off.
(G.G.BHANSALI)
Judge,
City Civil & Sessions Court,
Date : 27/09/2019. Mumbai.
1. Dictated on : 27/09/2019.
2. Transcribed on : 27/09/2019.
3. Signed on : 30/09/2019.
4. Delivered to Certified :
Copy Section on
-- 2 of 3 --
M.A.No. 72/19 in Review Petn.Stamp No. 8170/19 3 Order.
In N/m No. 1238/18 in Suit No. 7072/03.
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER”
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
30/09/2019. 4.53 p.m. Miss M.A.Kulkarni
Name of the Judge (with Court Room no.) HHJ Shri G.G.Bhansali.
(Court Room No.31).
Date of Pronouncement of Judgment/Order 27/09/2019.
Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 30/09/2019.
Judgment/Order uploaded on 30/09/2019.
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.