Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Dt: 02.01.2020 NM 2422/18 in SUIT 4397/05 ...NM 2422/18 in SUIT 4397/05 CORAM : H.H.J SHRI. DEEPAK L. BHAGWAT(C.R.NO.28) Adv. Rajesh Patil for plaintiff present. Adv. Ankita Sharma for JD. ORDER: The NM 2416/18 and NM 2422/18 have been filed by Judgment debtor Lalitaben requesting for refund of excess amount deducted from salary of respondent No.2. The respondent No.1 BMC has filed reply in both the notices. The advocate for DH is present…
NOTICE OF MOTION
Nagurao Malku Gadge - Exe. Appl. No. 4397 of 2005VsLalitaben K. Sakariya
CNR MHCC01007815201828-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHERWISE
Decision Date: 02nd January 2020
TrustJury record updated 14 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 102422/2018
- Registration Date
- 30 Jun 2018
Advocates
2For Petitioner
For Respondent
Parties
2Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 18-07-2018 Business: None for Plaintiff None for Defendant The defendant has not filed the registered Notice of motion, hence defendant is directed to file the same on or before the next date. Matter is adjd. to 17/09/2018 for Compliance and Service. L.O. Adv. B. S. Patil for D. H. present. Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2018 Date: 17-09-2018 Business: None for Plaintiff Adv. Mr.Dinesh Gupta for Defendant He seeks adjourned hearing. Matter is adjd. to 08/10/2018 for nm hearing. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 08-10-2018 Date: 08-10-2018 Business: Adv. for Plaintiff/D.H. absent. Adv. Ankita Sharma for Defendant J.D. present. J.D. present. Since the plaintiff/D.H. has not filed the reply and remain absent. Heard. The ld. Advocate for J.D. has submitted that the due amount is already recovered by the Bombay Municipal Corporation office from the salary of the Respondent no.2 She drew my attention on the some documents. Hence in view of the above submission it is just and desirable to stay the recovery of amount from the salary of the Respondent no.2- Anilkumar Sakariya, till further order. Accordingly, recovery is stayed till further order. Necessary intimation be given to the Bombay Municipal Corporation office for compliance. Matter is adjd. to 12/11/2018 for Hearing. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 12-11-2018 Date: 12-11-2018 Business: Adv. A. V. Diwate for Corporation present. Adv. Ankita Sharma for Defendant present. Respondent no.4 present. Interim order if any operating in the matter is extended till next date. On the oral request of the advocate for corporation, Matter is adjd. to 05/12/2018 for Reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2018 Date: 05-12-2018 Business: P.O. has gone for Medical examination for obtaining Health Fitness Certificate as per the direction of Hon\''ble High Court, hence case is adjourn. Matter is adjd. to 24/01/2019 for Reply. Next Purpose: REPLY Next Hearing Date: 24-01-2019 Date: 24-01-2019 Business: None for Plaintiff. None for Defendant. Matter is adjd. to 15/02/2019 for Hearing on N/M. Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING Next Hearing Date: 15-02-2019 Date: 15-02-2019 Business: None for Plaintiff. Adv. Dinesh Gupta for Defendant present. Heard the argument of defendant on N/M. Matter is adjd. to 11/03/2019 for N/M Order. Next Purpose: NM ORDERS Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2019 Date: 11-03-2019 Business: Adv. for Plaintiff absent. Defendant no.2 present. Adv. Ankita Sharma for Defendant present. Matter is adjd. to 27/03/2019 for N/M order. Next Purpose: NM ORDERS Next Hearing Date: 27-03-2019 Date: 27-03-2019 Business: None present Matter is Adjd for N/M Argument to 03/07/2019 Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 03-07-2019 Date: 03-07-2019 Business: None present for plaintiff Adv. Ankita Sharma for defendant present. Adjd. to 19.07.2019 for Notice of motion hearing. Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 19-07-2019 Date: 19-07-2019 Business: court is on leave. Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 07-08-2019 Date: 07-08-2019 Business: P.O is on training. Adjd to 17/9/19 Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2019 Date: 17-09-2019 Business: p.o. is on leave adjd to 14/10/19 Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 14-10-2019 Date: 14-10-2019 Business: None for DH. KB LO At 01.05 p.m JD present. Adv. Ankita Sharma for JD Adjd. to 19.11.2019 for argument. Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 19-11-2019 Date: 19-11-2019 Business: Adv. Ankita Sharma for applicant present. Heard arguments of applicant Adjd. to 05.12.2019 for nm order. Next Purpose: ORDER Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2019 Date: 05-12-2019 Business: Adv. Ankita Sharma for J/d present. Respondent no. 2 present. KB For Order Adj. To 13-12-2019 for NM Order Next Purpose: ORDER Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2019 Date: 13-12-2019 Business: Adv. Ankita Sharma present for the JD. Respondent no.2 present. None present for the Deft. JD is directed to furnish details as to the total payable amount vide consent terms in both the suits/Execution and also the total amount deducted from the salary and to produce salary slips in respect of whole period when the salary was deducted. The Respondent no.1 BMC is absent. The advocate of the JD is directed to intimate to the BMC to remain present on 16/12/2019 with all the salary record of Respondent no.2 and make a statement as to the total amount deducted from the salary of Respondent no.2 from March 2014. Adj. For Compliance on 17/12/2019. Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE Next Hearing Date: 17-12-2019 Date: 17-12-2019 Business: Adv. Ankita Sharma for JD present. On oral request of Adv. for JD matter adjd to 02/01/2020 for compliance of directions given by this Court on 13/12/2019. Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE Next Hearing Date: 02-01-2020 Date: 02-01-2020 Business: Adv. Rajesh Patil for plaintiff present. Adv. Ankita Sharma for JD. Adv. for JD filed List of documents @ details of total payable/deducted amounts. ORDER The NM 2416/18 and NM 2422/18 have been filed by Judgment debtor Lalitaben requesting for refund of excess amount deducted from salary of respondent No.2. The respondent No.1 BMC has filed reply in both the notices. The advocate for DH is present today also. He made a statement at bar that the DH has already received the whole recoverable amount and the decree has been already satisfied. He has no objection to refund the excess amount to the respondent No.2 as per the reply of BMC. Vide para-4 of reply BMC admitted that, 1. Amount of Rs.1,42,181.43/- in NM 2416/18 in Execution application 938/13, and 2. Amount of Rs.2,10,587/- in NM 2422/18 in Execution application 941/13, have been recovered in excess from the salary of respondent No.2. The salary slips of respondent No.2 are produced on record which reveal that till October 2018 the amount has been deducted from salary of respondent No.2. In total amount of Rs.5,43,000/- has been deducted from the salary of respondent No.2 whereas the total due and payable amount by the JD was Rs.1,90,231.57/-. Thus, it is clear that in total amount of Rs.3,52,768/- has been deducted in excess from the salary of respondent No.2. Resultantly, the respondent No.2 is entitled to refund of the said amount. Hence, 1. Amount of Rs.1,42,181/-Rupees One Lakh Forty Two Thousand One Hundred and Eighty One only in NM 2416/18 in Execution application 938/13, and 2. Amount of Rs.2,10,587/- Rupees Two Lakh Ten Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty Seven Only in NM 2422/18 in Execution application 941/13, be refunded to respondent No.2. Nature Of Disposal: OTHERWISE Disposal Date: 02-01-2020
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 108617/2018 Filing Date: 30-06-2018 First Hearing Date: 18th July 2018 Decision Date: 02nd January 2020 Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
2Final Order 1Full order available
02 Jan 2020
Order 1Full order available
02 Jan 2020
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Dt: 02.01.2020 NM 2422/18 in SUIT 4397/05 ...NM 2422/18 in SUIT 4397/05 CORAM : H.H.J SHRI. DEEPAK L. BHAGWAT(C.R.NO.28) Adv. Rajesh Patil for plaintiff present. Adv. Ankita Sharma for JD. ORDER: The NM 2416/18 and NM 2422/18 have been filed by Judgment debtor Lalitaben requesting for refund of excess amount deducted from salary of respondent No.2. The respondent No.1 BMC has filed reply in both the notices. The advocate for DH is present…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
