Date: 24-09-2019
Business: Adv. Banarjee for plaintiff present.
Adv. Shah for defendants present.
Original Chamber Summons no. 1641/19 tendered by the defendants
Reply filed by the plaintiff to CS no. 1641/19.
Registered NM 2833/19 tendered by the plaintiff.
Plaintiff tendered Draft Chamber Summons. Leave is granted to register.
Plaintiff seeks time to file reply to NM.
Adjourned for reply to NM to 19.11.2019.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 19-11-2019
Date: 19-11-2019
Business: Adv. Naved Chawdhary for plaintiff present.
Adv. Radhanpura for defendant present.
Plaintiff tendered registered chamber summons no. 1764/19.
Reply filed by defendant to chamber summons no. 1764/19 and notice of motion. 2833/19.
The Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff filed the hard copy of the Hon\''ble High Court dated 10.10.2019. The Hon\''ble High Court directed this court to decide the NM no. 2833/2019 as early as possible preferably within six weeks from the date of order. The copy of the order is tendered today by the counsel for the plaintiff. Almost five weeks have been passed. Therefore as per the direction of the Hon\''ble High Court the present NM is required to be decided on or before 24.11.2019. Hence, matter is adjourned for hearing on NM to 21.11.2019.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 21-11-2019
Date: 21-11-2019
Business: Adv. Banarjee with Adv. Navel Chawdhary for plaintiff present.
Adv. Shah for defendant present.
Plaintiff filed rejoinder to the NM and Chamber summons.
Heard argument of Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff and defendant on chamber summons no. 1641/19
Adjourned for order on Chamber summons no. 1641/19 and hearing on NM, if any to 22.11.2019.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 22-11-2019
Date: 22-11-2019
Business: Adv. Banarjee with Adv. Navel Chawdhary for plaintiff present.
Adv. Shah for defendant present.
FRSR following order is passed on Chamber Summons no. 1641/19.
1. Chamber Summons no. 1641/2019 is rejected.
2. Costs in the cause.
3. Chamber summons is disposed of accordingly.
_________________________________________
Adjourned for hearing on NM to 23.11.2019.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 23-11-2019
Date: 23-11-2019
Business: Adv. Banarjee with Adv. Naved Chawdhary for plaintiff present.
Adv. Kamble with Adv. Shah for defendant present.
Heard argument of Ld. advocate for the plaintiff and defendant on chamber summons.
Adjourned for order on chamber summons to 25.11.2019.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2019
Date: 25-11-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 30-11-2019
Date: 30-11-2019
Business: Adv. Mr. Naved Chaudhari for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mr. Ramesh Kamble for defendant present.
Writ received from Hon\''ble High Court. T.O.R.
The parties submitted that settlements talks are going on.
The matter is adjd for settlement/hearing to 04.12.2019 at 04.30 pm.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2019
Date: 04-12-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 06-12-2019
Date: 06-12-2019
Business: Adv. Mr. Naved Chaudhari along with Banerjee for plaintiff present.
Adv. Mr. Ramesh Kamble for deft. present.
Ld. counsel for deft. seeks time to file written statement of deft. no.2 and undertakes to file Vakalatnama on her behalf.
The matter is adjd for settlement/hearing to 11.12.2019.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 11-12-2019
Date: 11-12-2019
Date: 13-12-2019
Date: 16-12-2019
Date: 02-01-2020
Date: 03-01-2020
Date: 10-01-2020
Date: 23-01-2020
Date: 04-02-2020
Date: 05-02-2020
Business: Adv. Naved Chaudhary for plaintiff present.
Adv. Shahzad Radhanpura for deft. nos.1 and 2 present.
F.R.S.R. following order is passed -
ORDER
1. N/M No.2833/2019 stands rejected.
2. Cost in the cause.
3. N/M No.2833/2019 is disposed off accordingly.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff prayed for stay to effect and operation of the order for a period of two weeks.
Ld. counsel for deft. nos.1 and 2 submitted that the equipments of the plaintiff are lying in shop no.3 and are secured.
The N/M is rejected. No order was operating against the defts. and therefore, there is no question of stay to the effect and operation of the order. As the N/M has been filed by the plaintiff and no executable order has been passed in N/M, hence no question of stay of the order. The statement of the counsel for the defts. suffice the apprehension of the plaintiff.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 05-02-2020
