Full Order Text
Order 1 · 04 Sept 2018 · CNR MHCC010078002018
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: 1 Ch/sum no.1104-18 in L.C.SUIT no.1-16 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1104 OF 2018 (CNR no. MHCC010078002018) IN L.C. SUIT NO. 1 OF 2016 (CNR no. MHCC010133602015) M/s. D & H Associates ]..Plaintiff Versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai ]... Defendant Coram : M.S. Deshpande, Judge (Court Room no. 05) Date : 4th September, 2018. Mr. Shoaib I. Memon, advocate for plaintiff. Mr. Choudhari with Ms. Patil, advocate for defendant. ORDER 1. The plaintiff has taken out this chamber summons seeking amendment to the plaint. By the proposed amendment, the plaintiff wishes to add certain averments regarding floors of the suit building on the basis of the City Survey record, which the plaintiff got in the form of certified copy of City Survey Extract of the suit property during the pendency of the suit. 2. The learned counsel for defendant submitted that the defendant will not file any reply to the chamber summons and just -- 1 of 4 -- 2 Ch/sum no.1104-18 in L.C.SUIT no.1-16 make submission on law points. He submitted that in view of the provisions of Rule (2) of Order VI of the Code of Civil Procedure, the parties should plead only material facts and not the evidence, and therefore, the proposed amendment which is only in the form of evidence can not be allowed. 3. On the other hand, the learned advocate for the plaintiff submitted that during the pendency of suit, the plaintiff got the material document, which may throw light on the matter in dispute and therefore, a mere production of document on record will not suffice the purpose. For that sake some pleadings are necessary and therefore, the amendment has been proposed in addition to production of the said document being part of the annexures to the plaint. 4. Considering rival submissions it is the position of law that every pleading shall contain statement in concise form of material facts on which the party relies for his claim or defence, as the case may be, but not the evidence by which they are be proved. The plaintiff proposes the amendment in the form of pleadings that after filing the suit upon inquiring with the office of the Collector, the plaintiff came to know about City Survey Extract of the suit property. Plaintiff wishes to plead further, the position of the floors of suit building as depicted in the said extract and further produce its copy as the annexure to the plaintiff. 5. The suit is instituted seeking declaration that the notice dated 31.07.2015 issued under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act and the order dated 23.12.2015 passed in furtherance -- 2 of 4 -- 3 Ch/sum no.1104-18 in L.C.SUIT no.1-16 of the same are illegal and bad in law. The plaintiff is also seeking consequential relief of perpetual prohibitory injunction. The suit is instituted on 29.12.2015. The certified copy of extract of City Survey appears to have been obtained on 04.02.2016. Thus, the proposed amendment appears necessary for determination of matter in controversy. The notice of motion is also pending for hearing. Thus, the proposed amendment will not change the nature of the suit. If it is allowed it will not take away any rights of the defendant or cause prejudice to it. The proposed amendment is in the form of some facts constituted foundations for leading some evidence and same can allowed in order to decide the matter in controversy by curtailing multiplicity of proceedings. Therefore, the following order is passed : ORDER 1. The Chamber summons no. 1104 of 2018 is made absolute with direction to carry out the amendment in all respects within a period of 2 weeks from today that is on or before 18.09.2018 2. The parties to bear their own costs of the Chamber summons. sd/ (M.S. Deshpande) AdHoc Judge, Date : 04.09.2018 City Civil Court, Mumbai. Dictated on : 04.09.2018 Transcribed on : 04.09.2018 Checked by HHJ on : 04.09.2018 Signed by HHJ on : 04.09.2018 -- 3 of 4 -- 4 Ch/sum no.1104-18 in L.C.SUIT no.1-16 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 05.09.2018 at 12.10 p.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mrs. Gayatri P. Acharekar Name of the Judge (With Court Room no.) HHJ Shri. M. S. Deshpande C.R. no. 05 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 04/09/2018 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 04/09/2018 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 05/09/2018 -- 4 of 4 --
