SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT - SUMMARY SUIT
Mr. Vipul Jayantilal Sanghavi of M/s. VIR CreationVsM/s. Bombay Collection +1 more
CNR MHCC01007774201984-COURT 84 ADHOC JUDGE AND ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 31st January 2026
TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100909/2019
- Registration Date
- 13 Sept 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
3Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec Order 37 · Rule 2
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 14-11-2019
Business: Adv. Kalpana Trivedi for plaintiff present.
Adjd. to 20.01.2020 for service report.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2020
Date: 20-01-2020
Business: Adv. Jitendra Gor for plaintiff.
On his request adjd to 18.04.2020 for service report.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2020
Date: 18-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 08-05-2020
Date: 08-05-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 29-05-2020
Date: 29-05-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 09-06-2020
Date: 09-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 02-09-2020
Date: 02-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 06-10-2020
Date: 06-10-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 11-01-2021
Date: 11-01-2021
Business: P.O. is on leave.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 31-03-2021
Date: 31-03-2021
Business: As per office order 64/2021
Adjd to 08-09-2021.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 08-09-2021
Date: 08-09-2021
Business: None present for both parties.
KB
LO
Adv Mr.Jeetendra Gor present for the plaintiff.
None present for the defendant.
Adv for the plaintiff is present. He submits that the defendants are residing at Srinagar. The summons initially send to this defendants did not return due to lock down. He prayes for issuing fresh summons. In view of the above leave is granted to fresh summons. Plaintiff to comply accordingly.
Matter is adjd to 25.10.2021 for report.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 25-10-2021
Date: 25-10-2021
Business: Adv Ms.Trivedi present for the plaintiff.
None present for the defendant.
Adv for the plaintiff filed application extension of time to file writ of summons TOR O- time is extended issue writ of summons
Matter is adjd to 21.12.2021 for service of writ of summons.
Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 21-12-2021
Date: 21-12-2021
Business: Adv. Trivedi present for plaintiff.
None present for defendant
On her oral requested time is extended for service of writ of summons till next date.
Matter adjourned for service to. 10/03/22.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 10-03-2022
Date: 10-03-2022
Business: None present.
Matter is adjd. for service to 01-07-2022.
Later on
Adv. Kalpana Trivedi for plaintiff present.
Exh.05-She filed Service Affidavit TOR.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 01-07-2022
Date: 01-07-2022
Business: Both parties and their adv. absent.
Adjd to 06/09/2022 for Service.
L.O. at. 1.00 p.m.
Adv. Kalpana Trivedi for plaintiff present and requested time for service of writ of summons. Time granted.
Already adjd to 06/09/2022 for service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 06-09-2022
Date: 06-09-2022
Business: As court is vacant
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 19-11-2022
Date: 19-11-2022
Business: As court is vacant
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 16-02-2023
Date: 16-02-2023
Business: As court is vacant
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2023
Date: 17-04-2023
Business: Matter pertains to C.R.No.15
Adv. Mayuri Mangeshkar for plaintiff present.
None present for defendant.
Exh.06 - Service affidavit. O-seen.
Matter Adjd for ex-parte order on 03/07/2023.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 03-07-2023
Date: 03-07-2023
Business: Adv.Kalpana Trivedi present for plaintiff.
None present for defendant.
As per the report at Exh.5 and Exh.5A the Writ of Summons by RPAD refused by defendant, hence, proceed ex-parte.
Matter stands adjourned for ex-parte evidence on 13-09-2023.
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 13-09-2023
Date: 13-09-2023
Business: Adv.Kalpana Trivedi present for plaintiff. Seeking time. Time is granted.
None present for defendant.
Matter stands adjourned for Ex-parte Evidence on 22-11-2023.
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 22-11-2023
Date: 22-11-2023
Business: Adv.Roshan Bamane present for plaintiff. Seeking time. Time is granted.
None present for defendant.
Matter stands adjourned for Ex-parte evidence on 29-01-2024.
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2024
Date: 29-01-2024
Business: None present.
Matter stands adjourned for Ex-parte evidence on 01-04-2024.
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2024
Date: 01-04-2024
Business: Adv. Hiren Mestry present for plaintiff. Seeking time. Time is granted.
None present for defendant.
Matter stands adjourned for Ex-parte evidence on 10-07-2024.
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 10-07-2024
Date: 10-07-2024
Business: None present.
Matter stands adjourned for Ex-parte evidence on 03-09-2024.
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2024
Date: 03-09-2024
Business: As presiding office is on leave. Hence, matter is adjourned to
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 23-10-2024
Date: 23-10-2024
Business: Adv. Meet Doshi present for plaintiff. Seeking time. Time is granted.
None present for defendant.
Matter stands adjourned for Ex-parte evidence on 08-01-2025.
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 08-01-2025
Date: 08-01-2025
Business: As court is vacant. Hence, matter is adjd to.
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2025
Date: 05-03-2025
Business: court is vacant
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 25-04-2025
Date: 25-04-2025
Business: As court is vacant. Hence, matter is adjd to.
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 08-07-2025
Date: 08-07-2025
Business: None present.
Kept back.
Later on at 3.00 pm
None present.
Matter is adjourned for evidence, subject to costs of Rs.1,000/- for causing delay as per the provision of Section 35 B of CPC.
Matter stands adjourned to 14-08-2025 for Ex-parte evidence.
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 14-08-2025
Date: 14-08-2025
Business: None present.
Kept back.
Later on 12.15 pm.
Matter is pending for Ex-parte evidence since long. Hence matter is kept for dismissal.
Matter stands adjourned to 01-10-2025 for dismissal.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2025
Date: 01-10-2025
Business: As presiding officer is attending official training at Uttan. Hence matter is adjourned to
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2025
Date: 29-11-2025
Business: None present.
Kept back.
Later on at 12.05 pm.
Adv. Kalpana Trivedi present for plaintiff. Seeking time. Time is granted, subject to costs of Rs.1000/- to DLSA.
None present for defendant.
Matter stands adjourned to 03-01-2026 for dismissal.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 03-01-2026
Date: 03-01-2026
Business: Adv. Yashika Jain h/f Kalpana Trivedi for plaintiff through Video Conference.
Plaintiff is absent.
None present for defendant.
Today the matter is for dismissal.
The age of the suit 7 yrs old. Hence, top priority of disposal in accordance with the law. Last chance is sought to take the steps.
Perused the record as per roznama dated 08-07-2025, the matter was adjourned subject to payment of costs of Rs.1000/- for causing delay.
The matter was adjourned on 14-08-2025. None present on behalf of plaintiff costs appears to be not paid as directed. Therefore, matter kept for dismissal and adjourned to 01-10-2025. On 01-10-2025 my Ld. Predecessor was on training at Uttan therefore matter is adjourned on 29-10-2025 under the caption of dismissal. Seeking time by advocate Kalpana Trivedi and said request was again allowed subject to costs of Rs.1000/- to be paid to DLSA. Thus, the total costs to be paid is R.2000/- is not paid till date from July 2025 till this date since five months hence no quest for granting last chance. Hence, matter is kept in second sessions to clear the costs compliance and takin effective steps till 5.45 pm.
If the compliance order of costs is not made today by taking effective steps matter would dismiss at 5.45 without reference to this court.
Matter stands adjourned to 31-01-2026 for dismissal.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 31-01-2026
Date: 31-01-2026
Business: Parties are absent.
The Ld. Advocate Nidhi Shah is present through V.C.
The present matter is under the caption of dismissal.
The ld. Advocate Nidhi Shah appraised the court that she tried to serve upon defendant since last 7 yrs. However, he is not traceable therefore prayed to keep in Lok-Adalat.
However, unless both the patties are present before the court and they are duly served cannot be sent to the Lok-adalat, hence, it asking to keep the matter in Lok-Adalat. Hence, Summary Suit No.909/2019 stands dismissed in default.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 31-01-2026Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 108285/2019 Filing Date: 25-07-2019 First Hearing Date: 14th November 2019 Decision Date: 31st January 2026 Court Number And Judge: 84-COURT 84 ADHOC JUDGE AND ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 131 Jan 2026
31 Jan 2026
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Back Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 84 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT/0100909/2019 Mr. Vipul Jayantilal Sanghavi of M/s. VIR Creation Vs M/s. Bombay Collection Date : 31-01-2026 Business : Parties are absent. The Ld. Advocate Nidhi Shah is present through V.C. The present matter is under the caption of dismissal. The ld. Advocate Nidhi Shah appraised the court that she tried to serve upon defendant since last 7 yrs. However, he is not traceable therefore prayed to keep in Lok- Adalat. However, unless both the patties are present before the court and they are duly served cannot be sent to the Lok- adalat, hence, it asking to keep the matter in Lok-Adalat. Hence, Summary Suit No.909/2019 stands dismissed in default. Nature of Disposal : DISMISSED IN DEFAULT Disposal Date : 31-01-2026 COURT 84 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Print -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
