Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

IDBI Bank Ltd.VsM/s. Nitin Tours and Travels +3 more

CNR MHCC01007720201820-COURT 20 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 27th June 2018

TrustJury record updated 14 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101094/2018
Registration Date
28 Jun 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    5

    Petitioner

    1. 1IDBI Bank Ltd.

    Respondent

    1. 1M/s. Nitin Tours and Travels
    2. 2Mr. Nitin R. Kulaye
    3. 3Mr. Amar Sawant
    4. 4Mr. Ramesh Kulaye

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 27-06-2018
Business: Adv. Anita Present for the Plff.
None Present for the Deft.
As per service affidavit Ex.02. Deft no. 1, 2 and 4 served with the writ of summons by way of RPAD but it was return back postal remark intimation given. As deft no. 1, 2 and 4 failed to appear before the court when called the matter for hearing. Hence suit proceeded Ex-parte against deft no.1, 2 and 4.
Ld counsel for the Plff filed Draft CS alongwith Affidavit for substitute service by way of paper publication upon deft no. 3.
Order- Heard the Ld counsel for the Plff reason shown is just and proper for  of service of the writ of summons upon the deft no. 3 by way of the paper publication. Hence CS is made absolute in terms of prayer clause -A. No order as to costs. For Statistical purpose CS be registered.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 27-06-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 108513/2018
Filing Date: 28-06-2018
First Hearing Date: 27th June 2018
Decision Date: 27th June 2018
Court Number And Judge: 20-COURT 20 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    27 Jun 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 27.06.2018
62
Coram: A. A. Nandgaonkar Judge, City Civil Court,
Mumbai.(C.R.20)
SU 2713/17 Adv. Anita Present for the Plff.
None Present for the Deft.
As per service affidavit Ex.02. Deft no. 1, 2 and 4 served with
the writ of summons by way of RPAD but it was return back
postal remark intimation given. As deft no. 1, 2 and 4 failed to
appear before the court when called the matter for hearing.
Hence suit proceeded Exparte against deft no.1, 2 and 4.
Ld counsel for the Plff filed Draft CS alongwith Affidavit for
substitute service by way of paper publication upon deft no. 3.
Order: Heard the Ld counsel for the Plff reason shown is just
and proper for of service of the writ of summons upon the deft
no. 3 by way of the paper publication. Hence CS is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause A. No order as to costs. For
Statistical purpose CS be registered.
Adj. For Service affidavit on 09/08/2018.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    27 Jun 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 27.06.2018
62
Coram: A. A. Nandgaonkar Judge, City Civil Court,
Mumbai.(C.R.20)
SU 2713/17 Adv. Anita Present for the Plff.
None Present for the Deft.
As per service affidavit Ex.02. Deft no. 1, 2 and 4 served with
the writ of summons by way of RPAD but it was return back
postal remark intimation given. As deft no. 1, 2 and 4 failed to
appear before the court when called the matter for hearing.
Hence suit proceeded Exparte against deft no.1, 2 and 4.
Ld counsel for the Plff filed Draft CS alongwith Affidavit for
substitute service by way of paper publication upon deft no. 3.
Order: Heard the Ld counsel for the Plff reason shown is just
and proper for of service of the writ of summons upon the deft
no. 3 by way of the paper publication. Hence CS is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause A. No order as to costs. For
Statistical purpose CS be registered.
Adj. For Service affidavit on 09/08/2018.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.