Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mr. Paresh Rajendra ShahVsM/s. Victoria Iron and Metal Warehousing Pvt. Ltd.

CNR MHCC0100768420192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 03rd December 2019

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102779/2019
Registration Date
25 Jul 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr. Paresh Rajendra Shah

    Respondent

    1. 1M/s. Victoria Iron and Metal Warehousing Pvt. Ltd.

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 20-08-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for Plaintiff present.
He tendered registered NM No.2779/19 t.o.r.
Ex.2 Adv. Saurabh Utangale filed V/n for defendant t.o.r.
Adv for defendant sought time to file reply on NM.
Time is granted to file reply to NM.
There is element of settlement.
Therefore, matter is referred for mediation.
Parties are directed to appear before Mediator on 26.08.2019.
Adj for mediation report and NM reply to 13.09.2019.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 13-09-2019

Date: 13-09-2019
Business: Court is on leave, Hence matter adjourned.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2019

Date: 11-10-2019
Business: As P.O. is proceeded to Nashik to attend Regional Conference,
board discharge and adjd. to 26.11.2019
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 26-11-2019

Date: 26-11-2019
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Saurav Uttangale for defendant present.
Adjourned to 3.12.2019 for mediation report.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2019

Date: 03-12-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv. Saurav Uttangale I/b Adv. Tushar Goradia for defendant present.
Plaintiff present.
Mr. Rahul Ramesh Shah director of defendant present.
Ex 4 Consent Term filed by both parties.
Verified plaintiff and director of defendant Rahul Ramesh Shah.
They voluntarily agree terms contained in Exh.4.  I perused Exh.4 para 2 to 4 of the same state about background history of litigation which cannot form part of Consent Decree, so I exclude those terms while passing order.
Hence, pass following order
                          ORDER BELOW Exh.1
  1. Suit is decreed in terms para 1, 5 to 34 of Consent terms Exh.4.
2. Court fee if any as per Rule be  refunded to the plaintiffs.
3. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
4. In above terms suit stands disposed of.

       ORDER BELOW NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2779 OF 2019
Present N/M is taken out in Suit No.2779 of 19 which is disposed of in view of above order.  Therefore, N/M stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 03-12-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 108133/2019
Filing Date: 25-07-2019
First Hearing Date: 20th August 2019
Decision Date: 03rd December 2019
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    03 Dec 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 3.12.2019
SU 1067/19
NM 2779/19
Ex 4
CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02)
Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv. Saurav Uttangale I/b Adv. Tushar Goradia for defendant
present.
Plaintiff present.
Mr. Rahul Ramesh Shah director of defendant present.
Ex 4 Consent Term filed by both parties.
Verified plaintiff and director of defendant Rahul Ramesh Shah.
They voluntarily agree terms contained in Exh.4. I perused Exh.4
para 2 to 4 of the same state about background history of litigation
which cannot form part of Consent Decree, so I exclude those terms
while passing order.
Hence, pass following order:
ORDER BELOW Exh.1
1. Suit is decreed in terms para 1, 5 to 34 of Consent terms Exh.4.
2. Court fee if any as per Rule be refunded to the plaintiffs.
3. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
4. In above terms suit stands disposed of.
ORDER BELOW NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2779 OF 2019
Present N/M is taken out in Suit No.2779 of 19 which is disposed of
in view of above order. Therefore, N/M stands dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.