Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Premchand GulabchandjiVsTASLEEM AHMED SHAIKH

CNR MHCC010076652018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 14th January 2019

TrustJury record updated 14 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100205/2018
Registration Date
20 Jun 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 02-08-2018
    Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  Mr. Jain prays for issue of Warrant u/o.XXI, Rule 48 of CPC, without issue of notice, stating that the Execution Application is filed within two years of passing of Decree.  Hence, issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 03/10/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2018
    
    Date: 03-10-2018
    Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  On request of Mr. Jain, for return of warrant, adjd to 13/11/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 13-11-2018
    
    Date: 13-11-2018
    Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  Execution Application marked as Exh.A (colly.).  Report/letter bearing No.AC/10-02/Misc/2009-10, dated 04/10/2018, under this office Inward No.11295, dated 19/10/2018, received from the Department of Posts, India O/o The Chief Postmaster General, Maharashtra Circule, Mumbai-400 001, in respect of warrant of attachment u/o. XXI Rule 48 of CPC, is t.o.r. and marked as Exh.B.  Upon perusing the said letter, Mr. Jain seeks time to inquire with the office of Sheriff of Mumbai in respect of amount received in the office of Sheriff of Mumbai from the salary of the Defendant, and on his request, adjd to 30/11/2018.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 30-11-2018
    
    Date: 30-11-2018
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 14/01/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2019
    
    Date: 14-01-2019
    Business: Ms. Vashaili Chavan, Advocate for plaintiff present. Ms. Chavan, states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has been issued on 06/08/2018, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 14-01-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 107478/2018
    Filing Date: 20-06-2018
    First Hearing Date: 02nd August 2018
    Decision Date: 14th January 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.