Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mrs. Rehamunissa W/o Shahid Ali SayyedVsMr. Wahid Ali Sayyed S/o. Shahid Ali Sayyed and Ors.

CNR MHCC0100765020192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 13th December 2019

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102775/2019
Registration Date
24 Jul 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-07-2019
    Business: Adv. Avanendra Kumar for Plaintiff present.
    He tendered original NM No.2775/19 t.o.r.
    Adv. Bhushan Vardhman for defendant present.
    Adv for defendant sought time to file reply to NM.
    Time is granted as last chance to file reply.
    Adj for NM reply to 21.08.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2019
    
    Date: 21-08-2019
    Business: Adv. Avanendra Kumar for Plaintiff present.
    Adv. Rajak for defendant present.
    Advocate holding over for defendant submitted that Adv on record is busy in hospitalisation. Therefore, sought adjournment.
    Short adjournment is granted to file reply.
    Adj for reply to 07.09.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2019
    
    Date: 07-09-2019
    Business: Plaintiff present.
    Adv. Avendra Kumar For Plaintiff present.
    Adv. Girish Pawar For Defendant present.
    Reply not filed by defendants therefore notice of motion is to proceed without reply against the defendant and posted for NM hearing.
    Adjd for NM Hearing to 10/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2019
    
    Date: 10-10-2019
    Business: Adv. Avanendra Kumar for Plaintiff present.
    Adv. Bhushan Vardhamane for defendant present.
    Draft Notice of Motion filed by defendant. t.o.r
    O- Leave granted to register it.
    Copy is supply to the plaintiff.
    Say filed by plaintiff to draft NM.
    KB
    LO
    Same appearance.
    Heard arguments of both parties.
    Adjd. to 11.10.2019 for order at 1 p.m.
    Next Purpose: ORDER
    Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2019
    
    Date: 11-10-2019
    Business: Adv. Avnendra Kumar for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Bhushan Vardhaman for defendant present.
    Plaintiff present.
    ORDER PASSED BELOW DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION
           Perused draft notice of motion, affidavit in support of it, reply of plaintiff and roznamas.  Heard respective counsel for parties.
           Draft notice of motion is taken out by defendants to set aside order dated 07.09.2019 and to take their reply to notice of motion on record.  It is contended that defendants could not file their reply to notice of motion due to paucity of time and  being out of town for marriage function of their relatives, they could not contact their advocate and instruct him to file reply. Accordingly, they prayed in above terms.
           Plaintiff opposed draft notice of motion on the count that it is not supported by any document and prayed for dismissal of notice of motion.
           It appears that defendants through their advocate appeared in the matter on 17th July, 2019 and thereafter matter was adjourned from time to time for reply for their reply to notice of motion No.2775 of 2019.  On 07.09.2019, notice of motion has been proceeded without reply against the defendants and it was posted for hearing on notice of motion to next date. On next date, defendants took out present draft notice of motion to set aside impugned order and to take their reply to notice of motion on record. This fact shows their bona fide.  May it be so, in the interest of justice and fair trial, I am of the view not to deprive defendants from contesting notice of motion on merits.  Therefore, I am inclined to allow draft notice of motion on certain costs.  Hence, pass following order
    ORDER
    1.   Draft notice of motion is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of costs of Rs.1000/- by defendants to plaintiff within period of one week from the date of order.
         Defendants are permitted to deposit costs payable to plaintiff in the Court.
    2.  On payment of costs reply of defendants be taken on record.
    Costs paid by the defendants to plaintiff.
    Defendants have to file reply to notice of motion No.2775 of 2019 within one week.
    Adjd for reply to 17.10.2019
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 17-10-2019
    
    Date: 17-10-2019
    Business: By preceipy.
    Adv. K.R. Tiwari for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Bhushan Vardhaman for defendant present.
    Defendant tendered draft Notice of motion.
    O leave is granted to register it.
    Copy is served upon plaintiff.
    Reply filed by advocate for plaintiff on draft notice of motion.
    ORDER PASSED BELOW DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION
            Read draft notice of motion, affidavit in support of it, reply of plaintiff and roznamas in the proceeding. Heard respective counsel for parties.
         Draft notice of motion is taken out by defendants to condone delay caused in filing written statement and to take the same on record and to treat the same as reply to notice of motion filed by plaintiff.
              It is the contention of defendants that they were in search of documents for the purpose of drafting written statement and meantime, they also attended wedding function of their close relatives at native place because of which they could not give instructions to their advocate to file written statement within prescribed time. Accordingly, they prayed in above terms.
           Plaintiff filed reply and opposed notice of motion and prayed to impose heavy costs upon the defendants.
              Before adverting to the facts I would like to mention that it is a settled law that Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC is not mandatory and in specific circumstances written statement can be accepted with reasons. It is also held that in an adversarial system, no party should be denied an opportunity in participation of the justice dispensation system (Salem Bar Association V/s Union of India 2003 AIR SCC 189 and Zolba V/s Keshav 2008 AIR SCC 2099). In view of this legal position, now, I consider notice of motion.
     It is clear from the reason assigned by defendants that in collection of documents which are required for drafting written statement time has passed and so also because of their engagement in the marriage ceremony of their relative they could not give necessary instruction to their advocate to draft written statement within prescribed time. Reason assigned by them is sufficient to condone the delay caused. More so, delay caused cannot be said to be inordinate and deliberate.  Further they have shown their bona fide by annexing written statement along with present notice of motion. In the facts of matter, in the interest of justice I am inclined to allow present draft notice of motion with certain costs.  Hence, pass following order.
    ORDER
    1.Draft notice of motion is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b)  subject to payment of costs of Rs.1000/- (Rupees one thousand only) to the plaintiff within  period of three weeks from the date of this order.
    Defendants are at liberty to deposit costs payable to plaintiff in the Court.
    2. After payment of costs written statement of defendants be taken on record and marked exhibit.
    3. Draft notice of motion be registered for statistical purpose.
    4.  Accordingly, draft notice of motion is disposed off.
    Costs paid by defendants to plaintiff.
    Exh.3 Written statement filed by defendants TOR
    In view of above order, written statement is also treated as reply to notice of motion
    Adjourned for NM hearing to 14.11.2019
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 14-11-2019
    
    Date: 14-11-2019
    Business: Adv. Tiwari for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Rajak for defendant present.
    She filed adjournment application  Granted.
    Adjourned to 5.12.2019 for hearing.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2019
    
    Date: 05-12-2019
    Business: Adv. K. R. Tiwari for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Bhushan Vardhaman for defendant present.
    Heard counsel for parties.
    Adjourned for order to 13.12.2019
    Next Purpose: ORDER
    Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2019
    
    Date: 13-12-2019
    Business: Adv. Kunal Tiwari for plaintiff
    Adv. Rajak for defendants present.
    LO
    FRSR following order passed below NM 2775 of 2019
    Notice of Motion No.2775 of 2019 stands dismissed and disposed off accordingly.
    Adjourned for issues to 12.02.2019
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 13-12-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 108232/2019
    Filing Date: 24-07-2019
    First Hearing Date: 25th July 2019
    Decision Date: 13th December 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    13 Dec 2019

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: N/M No.2775/2019 1 Suit No.1595/2019 CNR No.MHCC010076502019 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2775 OF 2019 IN SUIT NO.1595 OF 2019 Rehamunissa w/o Shahid Ali Sayyed .. Plaintiff Versus Wajid Ali Sayyed s/o Shahid Ali Sayyed and Ors. .. Defendants Mr. K. R. Tiwari, advocate for plaintiff Mr. Bhushan A. Vardhamane, advocate for defendants CORAM : M. T. ASIM, J COURT ROOM NO.02 DATED : 13th December,…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.