CHAMBER SUMMONS
Ms. Nanda D/o. Ramchandra Baloo Kadam +2 moreVsMr. Prakash Ramchandra Kadam 1A. Mr. Avishkar Prakash Kadam 1B.Ms.Amruta Prakash Kadam
CNR MHCC0100764920197-COURT 07 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 01st August 2019
TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 101379/2019
- Registration Date
- 24 Jul 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
4Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 01-08-2019 Business: Matter called out (3.16pm) Adv.Laxmi Ingale for plaintiff present. Adv.Kedar Prabhu for defendant no.1(a)present. Plaintiff tendered original C/S No.1379/19. Order- Plaintiff filed C/S No.1379/19 for permission to serve writ of summons by substitute of service to the defendant no.1(a), 2 and 3. Heard advocate for plaintiff perused chamber summons and service affidavit. The affidavit of belief shows that defendant no.1(a),2 and 3 are residing on the given address. Plaintiff stated that the address of the defendant was last known address. Hence in my view plaintiff need to be allowed to substituted service. Hence C/S No.1379/19 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No.1379/19 is allowed. 2. Plaintiff is permitted to serve def.no.1(a),2 and 3 by way of substitute service. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 01-08-2019
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 108184/2019 Filing Date: 24-07-2019 First Hearing Date: 01st August 2019 Decision Date: 01st August 2019 Court Number And Judge: 7-COURT 07 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 101 Aug 2019
01 Aug 2019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: CHAMBER SUMMONS/101379/2019 Matter called out (3.16pm) Adv.Laxmi Ingale for plaintiff present. Adv.Kedar Prabhu for defendant no.1(a)present. Plaintiff tendered original C/S No.1379/19. Order- Plaintiff filed C/S No.1379/19 for permission to serve writ of summons by substitute of service to the defendant no.1(a), 2 and 3. Heard advocate for plaintiff perused chamber summons and service affidavit. The affidavit of belief shows that defendant no.1(a),2 and 3 are residing on the given address. Plaintiff stated that the address of the defendant was last known address. Hence in my view plaintiff need to be allowed to substituted service. Hence C/S No.1379/19 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No.1379/19 is allowed. 2. Plaintiff is permitted to serve def.no.1(a),2 and 3 by way of substitute service. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
