Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Ms. Nanda D/o. Ramchandra Baloo Kadam +2 moreVsMr. Prakash Ramchandra Kadam 1A. Mr. Avishkar Prakash Kadam 1B.Ms.Amruta Prakash Kadam

CNR MHCC0100764920197-COURT 07 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 01st August 2019

TrustJury record updated 21 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101379/2019
Registration Date
24 Jul 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 01-08-2019
    Business: Matter called out (3.16pm)
    Adv.Laxmi Ingale for plaintiff present.
    Adv.Kedar Prabhu for defendant no.1(a)present.
    Plaintiff tendered original C/S No.1379/19.
    Order- Plaintiff filed C/S No.1379/19 for permission to serve writ of summons by substitute of service to the defendant no.1(a), 2 and 3. Heard advocate for plaintiff perused chamber summons and service affidavit.  The affidavit of belief shows that defendant no.1(a),2 and 3 are residing on the given address. Plaintiff stated that the address of the defendant was last known address.  Hence in my view plaintiff need to be allowed to substituted service.  Hence C/S No.1379/19 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
    ORDER
    1. Chamber Summons No.1379/19 is allowed.
    2. Plaintiff is permitted to serve def.no.1(a),2 and 3 by way of substitute service.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 01-08-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 108184/2019
    Filing Date: 24-07-2019
    First Hearing Date: 01st August 2019
    Decision Date: 01st August 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 7-COURT  07 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    01 Aug 2019
    Order Details: Chamber summons
    Pdf Text: CHAMBER SUMMONS/101379/2019
    Matter called out (3.16pm) Adv.Laxmi Ingale for plaintiff present. Adv.Kedar Prabhu for defendant no.1(a)present. Plaintiff
    tendered original C/S No.1379/19. Order- Plaintiff filed C/S No.1379/19 for permission to serve writ of summons by substitute
    of service to the defendant no.1(a), 2 and 3. Heard advocate for plaintiff perused chamber summons and service affidavit.
    The affidavit of belief shows that defendant no.1(a),2 and 3 are residing on the given address. Plaintiff stated that the
    address of the defendant was last known address. Hence in my view plaintiff need to be allowed to substituted service.
    Hence C/S No.1379/19 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No.1379/19 is allowed. 2.
    Plaintiff is permitted to serve def.no.1(a),2 and 3 by way of substitute service.
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.