Full Order Text
Order 1 · 18 Dec 2018 · CNR MHCC010076292018
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: 1Ch/S No.1081/2018 in Suit No.4536/09 IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1081 OF 2018 (CNR NO. MH CC010076292018) IN S.C.SUIT NO. 4536 OF 2009 (CNR NO. MH CC010046802009) Bonny Charlie Baptista ... Plaintiff Versus 1. Sushant V. Parmar and Anr. ... Defendants Adv. Mr. Virendra Tripathi for plaintiff. Adv. Ms. Krutika Kothari for defendant no. 1. Adv. Mr. Saket Chavan for defendant no. 2. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE MS. S.P. PONKSHE. (C.R.NO.01) DATE : 18th DECEMBER 2018 O R D E R This Chamber Summons has been taken out by defendant no. 1 for deleting or discarding averments made in para no. 3 of the affidavit of evidence dtd 16.07.2015. 2. It is the case of the defendant no. 1 that the plaintiff has filed affidavit of evidence and in para no. 3, he has stated “ I say that made part payment to Mr. Stanley Thomas Gonsalves of Rs. 4,00,000/ I(Rupees Four Lakhs only) in pursuance thereof. I say that the original receipt is in possession of the defendant no. 1 which was handed over -- 1 of 5 -- :2: Ch/S No.1081/2018 in Suit No.4536/09 to him by me as demanded by him. I say that I had taken a colour xerox of the payment receipt. It bears the signature of Mr. Stanley Thomas Gonsalves, I identify the his signature as it has been signed by him before me and in the presence of one witness Mr. Rajesh P. Tripathi, I identify the his signature as it has been signed by him in my presence, the contents are true and correct and therefore same be exhibited in evidence and therefore exhibited as secondary evidence.” 3. It is averred that the said statement were never made earlier and it has been introduced for the first time in the evidence. Unless the case is pleaded in the plaint, party is debarred for putting the case in the evidence. The plaintiff had amended plaint in January 2010 and had opportunity for introducing whatever case he desires to put in evidence, to be put in the pleadings. Hence, prayed for discarding the said evidence stated in affidavit of examination in chief. 4. The plaintiff has filed reply and contented that the defendants have no right to suggest to the court or the plaintiff as to what evidence should be adopted by the plaintiff. It is for the court to decide at the time of final arguments of the suit, as to what is to be weighed and/or accepted or discarded from the evidence of the plaintiff or defendants, for the purpose of deciding the suit. Statement made by the plaintiff in his evidence is true and correct and forms part of the plaint and evidence of the plaintiff. It is denied that the said statements in the evidence affidavit was made for the first time in the evidence with no pleadings in the plaint. Hence prayed for dismissal of chamber summons. 5. Heard Learned advocate for defendant no. 1 and Learned -- 2 of 5 -- :3: Ch/S No.1081/2018 in Suit No.4536/09 advocate for the plaintiff. Perused pleadings. Perused order passed below exh. 8 on 12.11.2016. It appears that the plaintiff has sought permission to lead secondary evidence in respect of documents mentioned in exh. 8 and this court has allowed exh. 8 application and granted permission to the plaintiff to lead secondary evidence in respect of the documents except document at Sr.4. It appears that in the said application, document referred in para no. 3 of affidavit of examination in chief has been mentioned at Sr. 1. 6. It appears that in the pleadings the plaintiff has stated in respect of acquiring right, title and interest from 'Stanley Thomas Gonsalves and Other' in the year 2002. Accordingly in respect of the said acquired rights, the plaintiff has stated in evidence para no. 3 regarding the part payment made by the plaintiff to Mr. Stanley Thomas Gonsalves. Thus further it appears that vide exh. 8, even the plaintiff has obtained permission to lead secondary evidence in respect of the receipt of payment made by the plaintiff to said Mr. Stanley Thomas Gonsalves. It seems that the plaintiff has made even compliance of section 66 of the Indian Evidence Act in respect of the said receipt. Thus, acquisition of rights by way of agreement in the year 2002 from Mr. Stanley Thomas Gonsalves has been pleaded in the plaint. Acquisition of right in the property by way of agreement when pleaded, it is acceptable that the plaintiffs have impliedly pleaded acquisition of rights on payment of consideration amount. Thus it appears that the plaintiff has deposed accordingly in the evidence in respect of payment and receipt. 7. Thus, Learned advocate for defendant no. 1 has placed her reliance in “SU no. 3598/1996, Harish Loyalka and Anr. V/s Dileep -- 3 of 5 -- :4: Ch/S No.1081/2018 in Suit No.4536/09 Nevatia and Ors, dtd 7.04.2014” with respect principle held is guideline. 8. In view of above facts of the present suit, objection raised by defendant no. 1 in respect of part of evidence in para no. 3 of affidavit of examination in chief of PW1 has no merits and at this stage, said part of evidence is not justifiable to be ignored while recording evidence of the witness. Defendant no. 1 has every opportunity to cross examine the witness on the said document. The evidentiary value of the said document can be decided on merits at the time of final arguments. Thus, in the light of my above discussion, chamber summons is to be dismissed. With this I proceed to pass the following order. O R D E R 1. Chamber Summons No. 1081 of 2018 is hereby dismissed with costs. 2. Accordingly Chamber Summons no. 1081 of 2018 stands disposed of. (S. P. PONKSHE) Judge, Date: 18/12/2018. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 18/12/2018 Transcribed on : 18/12/2018 Signed on : 20/12/2018 -- 4 of 5 -- :5: Ch/S No.1081/2018 in Suit No.4536/09 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 24/12/2018 At 2.40 p.m. MRS. VARSHA PAHURKAR UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF COURT TYPIST Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ MS. S. P. PONKSHE (C.R.NO.01) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 18/12/2018 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 20/12/2018 Judgment/Order uploaded on 24/12/2018 -- 5 of 5 --
