Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 5 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0101076/2018 Mr. Dinesh s/o. Manilal Kankuwala Vs MCGM Date : 14-08-2018 Business : Mentioned by precepi. NOB. TOB. Adv. Vijaykumar Srivastav with plaintiff and Adv. Rawade for MCGM are present. Exh. 6 - Application for withdrawal of suit. Adv. Rawade consented. ORDER The plaintiff is present before the Court today. He is identified by Adv. Vijaykumar Srivastav and Adv. Sarogi. The plaintiff…
CHAMBER SUMMONS
Mr. Dinesh s/o. Manilal KankuwalaVsMCGM
CNR MHCC0100760320185-COURT 05 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 14th August 2018
TrustJury record updated 14 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 101076/2018
- Registration Date
- 26 Jun 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
- 1MCGM
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 27-06-2018
Business: Resumed.
Adv. Sarogi for plaintiff tendered registered NM and Ch/s. Adv. Chandramore submits that as per instructions given by the concern ward officer the notice structure is already demolished on 25.06.2018. Adv. Sarogi submits that it is not so demolished. Both the plaintiff and defendant are directed to file affidavit in support of their respective submissions with photographs bearing the date of taking photographs. Both the parties to maintain status-quo.
Adjd for hearing on ad-interim on 29.06.2018.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 29-06-2018
Date: 29-06-2018
Business: Resumed.
Adv. Sarogi for plaintiff and Adv. Chandramore for MCGM.
Adv. Sarogi filed affidavit with photographs. O - R and R.
Adv. Sarogi tendered draft Ch/s with affidavit seeking amendment to the plaint. Leave to register is granted.
Adv. Sarogi tendered draft NM with affidavit seeking restoration of status-quo ante. Leave to register is granted. Copies of the aforesaid affidavit, Ch/s and NM are served to the Adv. Chandramore for MCGM.
Adv. Sarogi tendered draft NM with affidavit seeking for disobedience of order. Leave to register is granted. He undertakes to serve notices to the defendant as well as respondent no. 2 within a period of two weeks.
Adv. Chandramore for MCGM filed additional affidavit in reply. O - R and R.
The P.O. is busy in judgment in Suit No. 4040/2006.
Adjd for reply to both Ch/s and reply to NM to 04.07.2018.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2018
Date: 04-07-2018
Business: Resumed.
Adv. Sarogi for plaintiff and Adv. Patil h/f Adv. Chandramore seeks time on the ground that Adv. Chandramore is on leave.
Adjd for reply and arguments on NM to 11.07.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 11-07-2018
Date: 11-07-2018
Business: The P.O. is busy in hearing of NM No.1891/2011 in Suit No. 1746/2011 and orders on NM No. 423/2017 and 422/2017 in Suit No.1400/2008 and 1396/2008 respectively. For want of time the board is discharged.
Adjd for NM arguments to 18.07.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 18-07-2018
Date: 18-07-2018
Business: The P.O. is busy in recording evidence in suit no. 2511/2011 and hearing of ad-interim in suit no. 1727/2018 and Orders on NM No. 1891/2011 in Suit no. 1746/2011. For want of time the board is discharged.
Adjd for NM arguments to 03.08.2018
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 03-08-2018
Date: 03-08-2018
Business: Resumed.
Adv. R.L. Singh h/f Adv. Ashok Sarogi for plaintiff and Adv. Chandramore for MCGM are present.
Adv. Singh tendered original NM No.2452/2018 for contempt and registered NM No. 2451/2018. He also tendered rejoinder to NM No. 2451/2018. He further tendered original Ch/s no. 1115/2018.
Adjd for arguments on Ch/s to 24.09.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2018
Date: 13-08-2018
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 14-08-2018
Date: 14-08-2018
Business: Mentioned by precepi. NOB. TOB.
Adv. Vijaykumar Srivastav with plaintiff and Adv. Rawade for MCGM are present.
Exh. 6 - Application for withdrawal of suit. Adv. Rawade consented.
ORDER
The plaintiff is present before the Court today. He is identified by Adv. Vijaykumar Srivastav and Adv. Sarogi. The plaintiff has prayed for withdrawal of the suit unconditionally. Considering the submission and contents of Exh. 6, leave is granted to withdraw the suit unconditionally.
Order on Exh. 1
In view of the leave to withdraw the suit unconditionally, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Court fee be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules.
Order on NM NO. 2345/2018
In view of withdrawal of the suit, the NM No. 2345/2018 is dismissed.
Order on NM NO. 2452/2018
In view of withdrawal of the suit, the NM No. 2452/2018 is dismissed.
Order on NM NO. 2451/2018
In view of withdrawal of the suit, the NM No. 2451/2018 is dismissed.
Order on NM NO. 2332/2018
In view of withdrawal of the suit, the NM No. 2332/2018 is dismissed.
Order on Ch/S NO. 1076/2018
In view of withdrawal of the suit, the Ch/S No. 1076/2018 is dismissed.
Order on Ch/S NO. 1115/2018
In view of withdrawal of the suit, the Ch/S No. 1115/2018 is dismissed.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 14-08-2018Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 108357/2018 Filing Date: 26-06-2018 First Hearing Date: 27th June 2018 Decision Date: 14th August 2018 Court Number And Judge: 5-COURT 05 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
2Final Order 1Full order available
14 Aug 2018
Order 1Full order available
14 Aug 2018
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 5 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0101076/2018 Mr. Dinesh s/o. Manilal Kankuwala Vs MCGM Date : 14-08-2018 Business : Mentioned by precepi. NOB. TOB. Adv. Vijaykumar Srivastav with plaintiff and Adv. Rawade for MCGM are present. Exh. 6 - Application for withdrawal of suit. Adv. Rawade consented. ORDER The plaintiff is present before the Court today. He is identified by Adv. Vijaykumar Srivastav and Adv. Sarogi. The plaintiff…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
