Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 30 Sept 2022 · CNR MHCC010075722018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: 1 Comm. Suit No.1037/2021 MHCC010075722018 Presented on : 25/06/2018. Registered on : 02/01/2020. Decided on : 30/09/2022 Duration : 2Y 8M 28D IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI. COMMERCIAL SUIT No.1037 of 2021 (Old Short Cause Suit No.21 of 2020) Canara Bank, a body corporate constituted under The Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, having its Head Office at 112 J.C. Road, Bangalore560 002, and one of its branch office amongst others known as Mazagaon Branch having address at All Saints Home Building, 54A, Dockyard Road, Ekta Nagar, Mazagaon Mumbai 400 010, in the State of Maharashtra, represented by Mr. Nishant Sinha, Age 25 years, Officer. ...PLAINTIFF VERSUS 1 M/s. Anand Tours and Travels (Proprietor Mr. Prataprao Anandrao Patil), A1/19, Room No.02, Opp. Mafco Market, Sector 21, Turbhe, Navi Mumbai 400705. 2 Mr. Prataprao Anandrao Patil, Age Not known, Adult, (Proprietor of M/s Anand Tours and Travels), A1/19, Room No.02, Opp. Mafco Market, Sector 21, Turbhe, Navi Mumbai 400705. …DEFENDANTS Shri Rishabh Mishra h/f Shri Rajmukar Shukla, learned Advocates for plaintiff. Defendants exparte. CORAM : JUDGE SHRI. N.P. TRIBHUWAN (C.R.NO.32) -- 1 of 5 -- 2 Comm. Suit No.1037/2021 E XP A R T E J U D G M E N T (Delivered on 30/09/2022) This is a suit for recovery of sum of Rs.7,82,785/ with interest @ 9.70% p.a. + penal interest @ 2% p.a. with monthly rests from the date of suit till realization of amount. 2. It is case of plaintiff that it is a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970. Defendant No.1 is proprietary concern. Defendant No.2 is its proprietor. On 31/10/2015 defendants approached to plaintiff bank for term loan of Rs.7,50,000/. On 31/10/2015, the plaintiff after complying all terms and conditions of the loan, sanctioned term loan of Rs.7,50,000/ to defendants for the purpose of purchasing vehicle Toyota Etios GD5. Plaintiff has sanctioned the said loan on condition that defendants shall repay the said loan in 60 equal installment. Defendants had executed hypothecation agreement and other documents on 31/10/2015 in favor of the plaintiff bank. Defendants have not paid loan installments. Hence on 12/06/2018 plaintiff has sent demand notice through advocate to defendants to make the payment of outstanding dues. 3. Defendants paid dues upto 31/10/2015 and therefore suit is within limitation. As on 31/05/2018 the amount of Rs.7,82,785/ is due and payable by defendants against the said loan account. Plaintiff is entitled of recover of aforesaid amount with contractual rate of interest 9.70 p.a. + penal interest 2 % p.a. Therefore, plaintiff has filed this suit. 4. Defendants served with suit summons but they did not appear. Hence, suit proceeded exparte against them as per order dtd.18/02/2022. -- 2 of 5 -- 3 Comm. Suit No.1037/2021 5. On above facts following points arise for determination and this court and recorded findings thereon for the reasons stated as under. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether the plaintiff proved that it has advanced Term / vehicle loan of Rs.7,50,000/ to defendants ? …Yes 2. Whether the plaintiff proved that it is entitled for recovery of sum of Rs.7,82,785/ together with interest @ 9.70% p.a. + penal interest 2 % p.a. from the date of suit till realization of suit ? …Yes 3. What order and decree? ...As per final order. REASONS AS TO POINT Nos.1 AND 2: 6. Heard learned counsel of Plaintiff. Plaintiff has examined its Officer (PW1 Vidhayadhar S. Khandait) to prove its case. He reproduced all content of plaint in his chiefexamination. His evidence is supported by documentary evidence : Loan application dtd.30/10/2015, Sanction letter dtd.31/10/2015, Hypothecation agreement dtd.31/10/2015, undertaking dt. 31/10/2015, Leagal notice with postal receipt, and particulars of vehicle. (Exh.16 to 23 respectively). 7. In view of evidence of PW1 Officer of plaintiffBank and documentary evidence, it becomes clear that on the request of defendants on 31/10/2015 plaintiff has sanctioned them term / vehicle loan of Rs.7,50,000/ for purchasing vehicle for commercial purpose. At the time of sanctioning the said loan defendants have executed Hypothecation agreement and above documents in favour of plaintiff. Defendants agreed to repay loan in 60 equal monthly installments with -- 3 of 5 -- 4 Comm. Suit No.1037/2021 interest. Statement of account shows that amount of Rs.6,56,051/ towards principal outstanding. As per the statement of account overdue as on Rs. 7,82,785/. As far as rate of interest is concerned, evidence of PW1 and the documents indicate that defendants are liable to pay the outstanding loan amount with the interest @ 9.70 p.a. + penal interest 2% p.a. from the date of suit till realization of the amount. 8. Evidence of PW1 remained unchallenged. His evidence is supported by documentary evidence mentioned in para supra. There is no reason to disbelieve his testimony. Hence, plaintiff succeed to prove that it has advanced above mentioned vehicle loan to defendants with conditions. The amount of Rs.7,82,785/ is due and payable by defendants to plaintiff with interest @ 9.70% p.a.+ penal interest 2% p.a. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled for the recovery of the same. Hence, I answered point Nos.1 and 2 as above. Hence, I pass the following order. ORDER 1. Suit is decreed with costs. 2. The defendant Nos.1 and 2 are jointly and severally directed to pay to plaintiff the amount of Rs.7,82,785/. 3. The defendant Nos.1 and 2 are jointly and severally directed to pay to plaintiff the interest @ 9.70 p.a. + penal interest @ 2% p.a. on principal sum of Rs.6,56,051/ from the date of suit till realization of the said amount. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. Date : 30/09/2022. (N.P. Tribhuwan) Judge, City Civil Court, Mumbai. C.R.No.32 -- 4 of 5 -- 5 Comm. Suit No.1037/2021 Dictated on : 30/09/2022. Checked on : 30/09/2022. Signed on : 30/09/2022. CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” (Mr. P. A. Ghodke) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF CLERKTYPIST Name of the Judge(with CR No.) HHJ SHRI. N. P. TRIBHUVAN (C.R.No.32) Date of pronouncement of Order 30/09/2022. Order signed by P.O. on 30/09/2022. Order uploaded on 30/09/2022. -- 5 of 5 --
