Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 1

CNR MHCC01007454201816 Jul 2022
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 1 · 16 Jul 2022 · CNR MHCC010074542018

Order Details: Order below exhibit
Pdf Text: 1 Order below Exh.1 in L.C. Suit No.1612 of 2018
CNR NO. MHCC010074542018
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL C0URT AT BOMBAY
ORDER BELOW EX.1
IN
LONG CAUSE SUIT NO.1612 OF 2018
1. Shamim Akbar Shaikh ]
An Indian Inhabitant, Aged 49 Years, ]
Occupation: Housewife, residing at ]
Indira Nagar, Wadi Bunder Road, ]
Road No.2, Mazagaon, ]
Mumbai – 400010. ]
2. Ahmad Akbar Shaikh ]
An Indian Inhabitant, Aged 31 Years, ]
Occupation: Business, residing at ]
Indira Nagar, Wadi Bunder Road, ]
Road No.2, Mazagaon, ]
Mumbai – 400010. ]
3. Tabassum Akbar Shaikh ]
An Indian Inhabitant, Aged 28 Years, ]
Occupation : Business, residing at ]
Indira Nagar, Wadi Bunder Road, ]
Road No.2, Mazagaon, ]
Mumbai – 400010. ] ...Plaintiffs
V/s.
1. The Municipal Corporation ]
of Greater Mumbai ]
A statutory body through 'B' Ward ]
Office, 121, Babula Tank Cross Road, ]
Opp. J.J. Hospital, Mumbai – 400009 ]
and also having its head Office at ]
Mahapalika Bhavan, Mahapalika ]
Marg, Near C.S.T. Mumbai – 400001. ]
2. The Assistant Municipal Commissioner ]
'B' Ward Office, 121, Babula Tank Cross Road, ]
Opp. J.J. Hospital, Mumbai – 400009. ] ..Defendants
-- 1 of 3 --
2 Order below Exh.1 in L.C. Suit No.1612 of 2018
Appearance:
None for Plaintiffs.
Adv. Mr. Sutar for MCGM/ defendants.
CORAM : HER HONOUR ADHOC JUDGE
SMT. A.H. KASHIKAR
CITY CIVIL COURT, GR. BOMBAY
(C.R. NO.05).
DATE : 16.07.2022
ORDER
The plaintiffs alongwith their advocates are absent though
called repeatedly. Record and Roznama of the suit shows that the
plaintiffs are absent since from dated 29.01.2019. Neither they
appeared nor taken steps to proceed further. Issues are framed on dt.
21.03.2020. However, even prior to the framing of issues and
subsequent thereto the plaintiffs remained absent. Matter is fixed for
recording the evidence of the plaintiffs. However, neither the plaintiffs
appeared nor recorded their evidence. In such circumstances, it is just to
dismiss the suit for want of prosecution and default in proceeding with
the suit. Hence, following order.
ORDER
1. L.C. Suit No.1612 of 2018 stands dismissed in default.
2. Proceedings is closed.
Date: 16/07/2022.
(A.H.KASHIKAR)
ADHOC Judge, City Civil Court,
Gr.Mumbai.
Dictated on : 16/07/2022.
Typed on : 16/07/2022.
Signed on : 16/07/2022.
-- 2 of 3 --
3 Order below Exh.1 in L.C. Suit No.1612 of 2018
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
16/07/2022. 5.57 p.m. (Subhash S. Poul )
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (With Court room
No.)
HHJ Smt. A.H. Kashikar
(C.R.No.05)
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGMENT/ORDER
16/07/2022.
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 16/07/2022.
JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 16/07/2022.
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.