Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 1

CNR MHCC01007428201816 Apr 2019
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 1 · 16 Apr 2019 · CNR MHCC010074282018

Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: 1/2 NM No.2299/18 in Su.1427/2018
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT, AT MUMBAI
CNR No. : MHCC010074282018
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2299/2018
IN
SUIT NO.1427 OF 2018
Mohd. Ashraf Mumtaz Ali Qureshi & Anr. ...Plaintiffs
V/s.
Mohd. Shahrukh Asharaf Qureshi & Anr. ...Defendants
Adv. Singh for plaintiffs.
Exparte against defendants.
CORAM : HHJ Shri. G.R. Agrawal
C.R. No.3
DATED : 16.4.2019.
ORDER
(Dictated in open court)
By this notice of motion, the plaintiffs are seeking temporary
injunction to restrain the defendants from entering upon or remaining
in the 'suit premises'. By order dated 14.9.2018, suit is proceeded ex
parte against defendants.
2. The Ld. Counsel for plaintiffs has filed written submissions in
support of notice of motion. Perused the record.
3. The plaintiffs have filed the original suit for declaration that the
defendants have no right to enter upon and/or remaining upon the suit
premises. Thus, the prayer in the suit and present motion is identical.
-- 1 of 3 --
2/2 NM No.2299/18 in Su.1427/2018
4. The plaintiffs are parents of defendant no.1 and defendant no.2 is
their daughter in law. The plaint and supporting documents reveal that
the defendant no.2 has lodged FIR against the plaintiffs and offences
u/secs. 376, 498A, 504, 506 and 34 of IPC are registered against them.
A perusal of the FIR shows that very serious allegations are made
against the plaintiffs.
5. There is no primafacie material to show that the defendants are
trying to enter the suit premises forcibly. It is pleaded in paragraph
no.16 that the defendants are not residing in the suit premises. Hence
the apprehension of the plaintiffs is unjustified. The plaintiffs have not
shown that they will suffer irreparable injury if injunction is refused.
The balance of convenience does not lie in favour of plaintiffs. Hence,
the following order.
ORDER
Notice of motion no. 2299/2018 is dismissed.
(G.R. Agrawal)
Judge
City Civil Court,
Gr. Bombay.
Dictated on : 16.4.2019
Transcribed on : 25.4.2019
Signed on : 25.4.2019
“CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED
JUDGMENT/ORDER”
26.4.2019 at 2.55 pm (Mrs. S. W. Tuscano)
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (with Court
room no.)
HHJ Shri G. R. Agrawal, C.R.
No.3
Date of Pronouncement of 16.4.2019
-- 2 of 3 --
3/2 NM No.2299/18 in Su.1427/2018
JUDGMENT/ORDER
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by
P.O. on
25.4.2019
JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded
on
26.4.2019
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.