Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 02 Mar 2019 · CNR MHCC010073592018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1/2 NM No.2280/18 in Su.4455/2013 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT, AT MUMBAI CNR No. : MHCC010073592018 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2280/2018 IN SUIT NO.4455 OF 2013 Kuniyur Janardhanan Srinivasan ...Plaintiff V/s. Kevin John Thompson & Ors. ...Defendants Adv. Sahani for plaintiff. Adv. Sanika Gokhale I/b Cyril Mangaldas for defendant no.3. CORAM : HHJ Shri. G.R. Agrawal CR No.3 DATED : 2.3.2019. ORDER (Dictated in open court) By this notice of motion, the plaintiff is praying to set aside order dated 28.3.2018, whereby the evidence of plaintiff is closed. The defendant no.3 has filed reply to the motion. 2. Heard Ld. Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. 3. It is submitted in the affidavit filed in support of notice of motion that the plaintiff could not comply the order dated 18.1.2018 as he was out of station hence, neither he filed evidence nor he paid the cost. However, as per Roznama dtd. 2.5.2018, Adv. For plaintiff produced letter issued to other side for praying cost by cheque. 4. The Ld. Counsel for defendant no.3 has opposed the motion by urging that the affidavit itself is frivolous, vexatious and untenable. -- 1 of 3 -- 2/2 NM No.2280/18 in Su.4455/2013 5. In the Roznama dated 28.3.2018 this Court has observed that despite grant of more than two month's time, the plaintiff has neither filed evidence nor paid the cost. Therefore, this Court closed the evidence of plaintiff. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for plaintiff that similar matter is pending before Hon'ble High Court and application for clubbing both the matters is pending which was filed on 27.3.2018. It is true that plaintiff was granted sufficient time to file his evidence. However, considering the reason given in the affidavit filed by plaintiff and the application pending before the Hon'ble High Court for clubbing the matters, notice of motion deserves to be allowed. However, plaintiff is liable to compensate the defendant by paying further costs. Hence, following order. ORDER The Notice of motion no.2280/2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of cost of Rs.3,000/ to defendant no.3 within two weeks. (G.R. Agrawal) Judge City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 2.3.2019 Transcribed on : 4.3.2019 Signed on : 5.3.2019 “CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 5.3.2019 at 10.45 am (Mrs. S. W. Tuscano) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (with Court room no.) HHJ Shri G. R. Agrawal, C.R. No.3 -- 2 of 3 -- 3/2 NM No.2280/18 in Su.4455/2013 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 2.3.2019 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 5.3.2019 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 5.3.2019 -- 3 of 3 --
